Shared Representations as Coordination Tools for Interaction

Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 303-333

  Pezzulo, Giovanni ^a,b  

^a CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE OF COGNITIVE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862307984     PISSN: 18785158     EISSN: 18785166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13164-011-0060-5     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aarts, H., Gollwitzer, P., and Hassin, R. 2004. Goal contagion: Perceiving is for pursuing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87: 23-37.
2. Bacharach, M. 2006. In Beyond individual choice, eds. N. Gold, and R. Sugden, Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. http://press. princeton. edu/titles/8174. html.
3. Baker, C. L., Saxe, R., and Tenenbaum, J. B. 2009. Action understanding as inverse planning. Cognition 113(3): 329-349.
4. Bishop, C. M. 2006. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer.
5. Blakemore, S.-J., and Frith, C. 2005. The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia 43(2): 260-267.
6. Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M., and Frith, C. D. 1998. Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience 1(7): 635-640.
7. Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., and Cohen, J. D. 2001. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108(3): 624-652.
8. Bratman, M. 1987. Intentions, plans, and practical reason. Harvard University Press.
9. Brown-Schmidt, S., Gunlogson, C., and Tanenhaus, M. K. 2008. Addressees distinguish shared from private information when interpreting questions during interactive conversation. Cognition 107(3): 1122-1134.
10. Chartrand, T. L., and Bargh, J. A. 1999. The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(6): 893-910.
11. Clark, H. H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge University Press.
12. Cuijpers, R. H., van Schie, H. T., Koppen, M., Erlhagen, W., and Bekkering, H. 2006. Goals and means in action observation: A computational approach. Neural Networks 19(3): 311-322.
13. Demiris, Y., and Khadhouri, B. 2005. Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition (hammer). Robotics and Autonomous Systems Journal 54: 361-369.
14. Desmurget, M., and Grafton, S. 2000. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 423-431.
15. Dindo, H., Zambuto, D., and Pezzulo, G. 2011. Motor simulation via coupled internal models using sequential monte carlo. In Proceedings of IJCAI 2011.
16. Ferguson, M. J., and Bargh, J. A. 2004. How social perception can automatically influence behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1): 33-39.
17. Frith, C. D., Blakemore, S. J., and Wolpert, D. M. 2000. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 355(1404): 1771-1788.
18. Frith, C. D., and Frith, U. 2006. How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research 1079(1): 36-46.
19. Frith, C. D., and Frith, U. 2008. Implicit and explicit processes in social cognition. Neuron 60(3): 503-510.
20. Galantucci, B. 2009. Experimental semiotics: A new approach for studying communication as a form of joint action. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(2): 393-410.
21. Gallese, V. 2009. Motor abstraction: A neuroscientific account of how action goals and intentions are mapped and understood. Psychological Researchs 73(4): 486-498.
22. Garrod, S., and Pickering, M. J. 2009. Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(2): 292-304.
23. Gergely, G., and Csibra, G. 2003. Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 287-292.
24. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics, eds. P. Cole, and J. L. Morgan, vol. 3. New York: Academic Press.
25. Grosz, B. J. and Sidner, C. 1990. Plans for discourse. In Intentions in communication, eds. P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. E. Pollack, MIT Press.
26. Grush, R. 2004. The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(3): 377-96.
27. Hamilton, A. F. D. C., and Grafton, S. T. 2007. The motor hierarchy: From kinematics to goals and intentions. In Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition, eds. P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, and M. Kawato, Oxford University Press.
28. Horton, W. S., and Keysar, B. 1996. Cognition 59(1): 91-117.
29. Isenhower, R. W., Richardson, M. J., Carello, C., Baron, R. M., and Marsh, K. L. 2010. Affording cooperation: Embodied constraints, dynamics, and action-scaled invariance in joint lifting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17(3): 342-347.
30. Jeannerod, M. 2001. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage 14: S103-S109.
31. Jeannerod, M. 2006. Motor cognition. Oxford University Press.
32. Kaelbling, L. P., Littman, M., and Cassandra, A. R. 1998. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence 101: 99-134.
33. Kalman, R. E. 1960. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering 82(1): 35-45.
34. Kawato, M. 1999. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9: 718-27.
35. Kelso, J. A. S. 1995. Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
36. Kilner, J., Paulignan, Y., and Blakemore, S. 2003. An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology 13: 522-525.
37. Kilner, J. M., Friston, K. J., and Frith, C. D. 2007. Predictive coding: An account of the mirror neuron system. Cognitive Processing 8(3): 159-166.
38. Kirsh, D. 2010. Thinking with external representations. AI & Society 25(4): 441-454.
39. Knoblich, G., and Sebanz, N. 2008. Evolving intentions for social interaction: From entrainment to joint action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 363(1499): 2021-2031.
40. Newman-Norlund, R. D., Bosga, J., Meulenbroek, R. G. J., and Bekkering, H. 2008. Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: Virtual lifting and balancing. Neuroimage 41(1): 169-177.
41. Newman-Norlund, R. D., van Schie, H. T., van Zuijlen, A. M. J., and Bekkering, H. 2007. The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience 10(7): 817-818.
42. Pacherie, E. 2008. The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition 107: 179-217.
43. Pezzulo, G. 2008. Coordinating with the future: The anticipatory nature of representation. Minds and Machines 18(2): 179-225.
44. Pezzulo, G. 2011. Grounding procedural and declarative knowledge in sensorimotor anticipation. Mind and Language 26(1): 78-114.
45. Pezzulo, G., and Castelfranchi, C. 2007. The symbol detachment problem. Cognitive Processing 8(2): 115-131.
46. Pezzulo, G., and Castelfranchi, C. 2009. Thinking as the control of imagination: A conceptual framework for goal-directed systems. Psychological Research 73(4): 559-577.
47. Pezzulo, G., and Dindo, H. 2011. What should i do next? using shared representations to solve interaction problems. Experimental Brain Research. http://www. springerlink. com/content/v1626220237466x2/.
48. Pickering, M. J., and Garrod, S. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2): 169-90; discussion 190-226.
49. Prinz, W. 1990. A common coding approach to perception and action. In Relationships between perception and action, eds. O. Neumann, and W. Prinz, 167-201. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
50. Prinz, W. 1997. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 9: 129-154.
51. Rizzolatti, G., Camarda, R., Fogassi, L., Gentilucci, M., Luppino, G., and Matelli, M. 1988. Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. ii. area f5 and the control of distal movements. Experimental Brain Research 71(3): 491-507.
52. Rizzolatti, G., and Craighero, L. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27: 169-192.
53. Searle, J. 1995. The Construction of social reality. New York: The Free Press.
54. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., and Knoblich, G. 2006. Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science 10(2): 70-76.
55. Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., and Prinz, W. 2005. How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 31(6): 1234-1246.
56. Stalnaker, R. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701-721.
57. Sudgen, R. 2003. The logic of team reasoning. Philosophical Explorations 16(3): 165-181.
58. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., and Moll, H. 2005. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(5): 675-91; discussion 691-735.
59. Tsai, J. C.-C., Sebanz, N., and Knoblich, G. 2011. The groop effect: groups mimic group actions. Cognition 118(1): 135-140.
60. Umiltà, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keyers, C., and Rizzolatti, G. 2001. I know what you are doing. A neurophysiological study. Neuron 31(1): 155-65.
61. van der Wel, R., Knoblich, G., and Sebanz, N. 2010. Let the force be with us: Dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. http://www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pubmed/21417545.
62. Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., and Sebanz, N. 2010. A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks 23(8-9): 998-1003.
63. Wilson, M., and Knoblich, G. 2005. The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin 131: 460-473.
64. Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., and Kawato, M. 2003. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 358(1431): 593-602.
65. Wolpert, D. M., Gharamani, Z., and Jordan, M. 1995. An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269: 1179-1182.
66. Yoshida, W., Dolan, R. J., and Friston, K. J. 2008. Game theory of mind. PLoS Computational Biology 4(12): e1000254+.