The effects of national institutions on audit research: evidence from Europe and North America

European Accounting Review

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 569-587

  Maijoor, Steven ^a   Meuwissen, Roger ^a   Quadackers, Luc ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862254432     PISSN: 09638180     EISSN: 14684497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638180020023990     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Acemoglu, D., and Gietzmann, M. B., 1997. Auditor independence, incomplete contracts and the role of legal liability. European Accounting Review, 6 (3): 355–375.
2. Buijink, W., Maijoor, S., Meuwissen, R., and van Witteloostuijn, A., 1996. The role, position and liability of the statutory auditor within the European Union, Luxembourg: ECSC-ECEAEC. Study commissioned by DG XV of the European Commission
3. Carmona, S., Gutiérrez, I., and Camara, M., 1999. A profile of European accounting research: evidence from leading research journals. European Accounting Review, 8 (3): 463–480.
4. Carnaghan, C., Flower-Gyepesi, J., and Gibbins, M., 1994. Profile of Contemporary Accounting Research: Fall 1984-Spring 1994. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (1-1) Summer: 251–270.
5. Davis, J. S., and Solomon, I., 1989. Experience, expertise, and expert-performance research in public accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature, 8: 150–164.
6. Dyl, E. A., and Lilly, M. S., 1985. A note on institutional contributions to the accounting literature. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10 (2): 171–175.
7. FEE. 1995. “ Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens ”. In Etude sur les Activités des Professionels Comptables en Europe, Brussels: FEE.
8. Forte, F., 1995. European economics: a tiny creature under tutorship. Kyklos, 48 (2): 211–217.
9. Frey, B. S., and Eichenberger, R., 1992. “ Economics and economists ”. In American Economic Review 216–220.
10. Gwilliam, D., Current developments in United Kingdom auditing research. Proceedings of the 1984 Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems. Edited by: Stettler, H. F., and Ford, N. A., pp. 133–157.
11. Gwilliam, D., 1987. A Survey of Auditing Research, London: Prentice-Hall.
12. Hopwood, A. G., and Schreuder, H., 1984. European accounting research: an introduction. European Contributions to Accounting Research,: 1–12.
13. Lukka, K., and Kasanen, E., 1996. Is accounting a global or a local discipline? Evidence from major research journals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21: 755–773.
14. Moizer, P., 1992. “ State of the art in audit market research ”. In European Accounting Review 333–348.
15. Nobes, C., and Parker, R., 1991. Comparative International Accounting, Cambridge: Prentice-Hall.
16. Panozzo, F., 1997. The making of the good academic accountant. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22 (5): 447–480.
17. Portes, R., 1987. “ Economics in Europe ”. In European Economic Review 1329–1340.
18. Quadackers, L., Mock, T. J., and Maijoor, S., 1996. Audit risk and audit programmes: archival evidence from four Dutch audit firms. European Accounting Review, 5 (2): 217–237.
19. Scott, W. R., 1995. Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J., Jr. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn., Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
21. Smith, G., and Krogstad, J. L., 1984. Impact of sources and authors on Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory–a citation analysis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 4 (1) Fall: 107–117.
22. Smith, G., and Krogstad, J. L., 1988. ¢ taxonomy of content and citations in Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory'. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 8 (1) Fall: 108–117.
23. Smith, G., and Krogstad, J. L., 1991. Sources and uses of Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory's literature: the first decade. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10 (2) Fall: 84–97.
24. Willekens, M., Steele, A., and Miltz, D., 1996. Audit standards and auditor liability: a theoretical model. Accounting and Business Research, 26 (3): 249–264.