Audit risk and audit programmes: archival evidence from four Dutch audit firms

European Accounting Review

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 217-237

  Quadackers, Luc ^a   Mock, Theodore J ^b   Maijoor, Steven ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84992949040     PISSN: 09638180     EISSN: 14684497     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638189600000014     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Auditing Standards Board. 1983. Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit, Vol. 47, AICPA. SAS No
2. Auditing Standards Board. 1981. Audit Sampling, Vol. 39, AICPA. SAS No
3. Bedard, J., 1989. An archival study of audit program planning. Auditing: AJournal of Practice & Theory, Fall: 57–71.
4. Bedard, J. C., and Wright, A. M., 1994. The functionality of decision heuristics reliance on prior adjustments in evidential planning. Behavioral Research in Accounting,: 62–89. Supplement
5. Daniel, S. J., 1988. Some empirical evidence about the assessment of audit risk in practice. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Spring: 174–181.
6. DiPietro, J. D., Mock, T. J., and Wright, A., 1994. “ An investigation of adaptabiliy in evidential planning ”. In Proceedings of the Deloitte and Touche, Vol. XII, 73–91. University of Kansas Syrnposium on Auditing Problems.
7. Joyce, E. J., and Biddle, G. C., 1981. Anchoring and adjustment in probabilistic inference in auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, Spring: 120–145.
8. Kaplan, S., 1985. An examination of the effects of environment and explicit internal control evaluation on planned audit hours. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Fall: 12–25.
9. Mock, T. J., and Turner, J. L., 1981. Internal Accounting Control Evaluation and Auditor Judgment, Audit Research Monograph, Vol. 3, New York: AICPA.
10. Mock, T. J., and Wright, A., 1993. An exploratory study of auditor evidentialplanning judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Fall: 39–61.
11. NIVRA (1992) ‘CORA Ontwerprichtlijn 4.04’, Richtlijnen voor de Accountantscontrole
12. O'Keefe, T. B., Simunic, D. A., and Stein, M. T., 1994. The production of auditservices: evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn: 241–261.
13. Wallage, P., 1993a. “ Risicomanagement in de Jaarrekening ”. In VERA-Actualiteiten, 17–42. IVRA.
14. Wallage, P., 1993b. Internationalising audit: a study of audit approaches in the Netherlands. European Accounting Review, 3: 555–578.
15. Waller, W. S., 1993. Auditors' assessments of inherent and control risk in fieldsettings. The Accounting Review, October: 783–803.
16. Wright, A., 1988. The impact of prior working papers on auditor evidential planning judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6: 595–605.