Still Learning to Speak and Still Not Being Heard: Public Administration and the Latest Financial Crisis

Administration and Society

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 367-373

  Potter, Michael ^a  

^a APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ethics; financial crisis of 2008; financial services policy; public interest; regulatory policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862239313     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399712451521     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Bankers' Association's Government Relations Priorities for 2012. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.aba.com/Industry+Issues/default.htm.
2. Baumgartner F.,Jones B. D.The politics of attention: How government prioritizes problems. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago; 2005:.
3. Blair C.,Kushneider R.Challenges to the dual banking system: The funding of bank supervision.FDIC Banking Review. 2006;18 (1):.
4. Box R. C.The Administrator as trustee of the public interest: Normative ideals and daily practice.Administration & Society. 1992;24:3-34.
5. Brintnall M.Political science and the savings and loan crisis: An introduction.PS: Political Science & Politics. 1991;24:432-433.
6. Dell'AricciaG.MarquezR. (2001). Competition among regulators. International Monetary Fund. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.cfm?sk=4107.0.
7. Eisner M. A.Regulatory politics in transition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2000:.
8. EstacheA.MartimortD. (1999). Politics, transaction costs, and the design of regulatory institutions. The World Bank. Retrieved from http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=477960&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000094946_99032604581622.
9. Ferran E.Examining the UK's experience in adopting the single financial regulator model.Brooklyn Journal of International Law. 2003;28:258-307.
10. Freeman K. D.Analysis of twenty-first century risks in light of the recent market collapse. Washington, DC: Department of Defense Irregular Warfare Support Program; 2009:.
11. Public administration and the public interest. Goodsell C., ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1990:.
12. Green R. T.Plutocracy, bureaucracy, and the end of public trust.Administration & Society. 2012;44:109-143.
13. Greider W.Secrets of the temple: How the federal reserve runs the country. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1987:.
14. Hammond B.Banks and politics in America: From the revolution to the civil war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1957:.
15. Hammond B.Sovereignty and an empty purse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1970:.
16. Hausman D. M.,McPherson M. S.Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2006:.
17. Hoffmann S.Politics and banking, Ideas, Public Policy, and the Creation of Financial Institutions. 2001). Politics and banking, Ideas, Public Policy, and the Creation of Financial Institutions (1st ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001:.
18. Hoffmann S. M.,Cassell M. K.Mission expansion in the Federal Home Loan Bank System. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 2010:.
19. Hoffmann S. M.,Cassell M. K.Mission expansion in the Federal Home Loan Bank System. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 2010:.
20. ICBA Policy Resolutions for 2012-Track I: Legislation and Regulation. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.icba.org/advocacy/index.cfm?ItemNumber=69818&sn.ItemNumber=1709.
21. Kettl D. F.The savings-and-loan bailout: The mismatch between the headlines and the issues.PS: Political Science & Politics. 1991;24:441-447.
22. Khademian A. M.Checking on banks: Autonomy and accountability in three federal agencies. 1996). Checking on banks: Autonomy and accountability in three federal agencies (1st ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1996:.
23. Khademian A. M.Bankruptcies, bailouts and the banking bureaucracy: The bush agenda and the capacity for crisis.The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics. 2009;:.
24. Long N. E.Politics, political science and the public interest.PS: Political Science & Politics. 1991;24:670-675.
25. Meier K. J.Regulation: Politics, bureaucracy and economics. New York, NY: St. Martin's; 1985:.
26. Olejarski A. M.Public good as public interest? The principle of tangibility in eminent domain legislation.Public Integrity. 2011;13:41-58.
27. Radin B. A.Beyond Machiavelli: Policy analysis comes of age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2000:.
28. Rohr J. A.Public service, ethics, and constitutional practice. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas; 1998:.
29. Scott K. E.A model of competition in regulation.Stanford Law Review. 1977;30 (1): 1-50.
30. The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report. New York, NY:; 2011:.
31. YinglingE.MilnerN. (2005). Viewpoint: Preserve a strong dual banking system. Retrieved from http://www.csbs.org/news/press-releases/pr2005/Pages/ViewpointPreserveaStrongDualBankingSystem.aspxBio.