A randomised trial comparing the CEL-100 videolaryngoscope™ with the Macintosh laryngoscope blade for insertion of double-lumen tubes

Anaesthesia

Volumn 67, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 771-776

  Lin, W ^a   Li, H ^a   Liu, W ^a   Cao, L ^a   Tan, H ^a   Zhong, Z ^a  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY CANCER CENTER   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE LUMEN TUBE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTUBATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LARYNGOSCOPE; LARYNX; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; AGED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; THORACIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862212069     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07137.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benumof JL. Separation of the two lungs (double-lumen tube intubation). In: Benumof JL, ed. Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1987, pp 223-59.
2. Hagihira S, Takahashina M, Mori T, Yoshiya I. One-lung ventilation in patients with difficult airways. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 1998; 12: 186-8.
3. Mikuni I, Suzuki A, Takahata O, Fujita S, Otomo S, Iwasaki H. Arytenoid cartilage dislocation caused by a double-lumen endobronchial tube. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2006; 96: 136-8. (Pubitemid 43124545)
4. Potocnik I, Kupsch A, Jankovic VN. Iatrogenic rupture of the trachea caused by double lumen tube intubation. Central European Journal of Medicine 2010; 5: 737-41.
5. Lim TJ, Lim Y, Liu EH. Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 180-3. (Pubitemid 40220687)
6. Teoh WH, Saxena S, Shah MK, Sia AT. Comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: Pentax Airway Scope, C-MAC, Glidescope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 1126-32.
7. Suzuki A, Kunisawa T, Iwasaki H. Double lumen tube placement with the Pentax-Airway Scope. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2007; 54: 853-4. (Pubitemid 47597133)
8. Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. The Airtraq® laryngoscope for placement of double-lumen endobronchial tube. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2007; 54: 955-7. (Pubitemid 350206621)
9. Bustamante S, Parra-Sánchez I, Apostolakis J. Sequential rotation to insert a left double-lumen endotracheal tube using the GlideScope. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2010; 57: 282-3.
10. Bensghir M, Alaoui H, Azendour H, et al. Faster double-lumen tube intubation with the videolaryngoscope than with a standard laryngoscope. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2010; 57: 980-4.
11. Hernandez AA, Wong DH. Using a GlideScope for intubation with a double lumen endotracheal tube. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2005; 52: 658-9. (Pubitemid 41149874)
12. Teoh WH, Sia AT, Fun WL. A prospective, randomised, cross-over trial comparing the EndoFlex and standard tracheal tubes in patients with predicted easy intubation. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1172-7.
13. Lee A, Fan LT, Gin T, Karmakar MK, Ngan Kee WD. A systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the Mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2006; 102: 1867-78. (Pubitemid 43799871)
14. Slinger P. A view of and through double-lumen tubes. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2003; 17: 287-8. (Pubitemid 36775840)
15. Brodsky JB. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy need not to be a routine part of double-lumen tube placement. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology 2004; 17: 7-11. (Pubitemid 38251034)
16. Cohen E. Double-lumen tube position should be confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Current Opinion in Anesthesiology 2004; 17: 1-6. (Pubitemid 38251033)
17. Andersen LH, Rovsing L, Olsen KS. GlideScope videolaryngoscope vs Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2011; 55: 1090-7.
18. Abdelmalak BB, Bernstein E, Egan C, et al. GlideScope® vs flexible fibreoptic scope for elective intubation in obese patients. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 550-5.
19. Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia 1984; 39: 1105-11. (Pubitemid 15103964)
20. Turkstra TP, Harle CC, Armstrong KP, et al. The GlideScope-specific rigid stylet and standard malleable stylet are equally effective for GlideScope use. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2007; 54: 891-6. (Pubitemid 350206606)
21. Arino JJ, Velasco JM, Gasco C, Lopez-Timoneda F. Straight blades improve visualization of the larynx while curved blades increase ease of intubation: a comparison of the Macintosh, Miller, McCoy, Belscope and Lee-Fiberview blades. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2003; 50: 501-6. (Pubitemid 36833609)
22. Sharma D. Is GlideScope the best way to intubate? Anesthesiology 2010; 113: 258-9.
23. Hirabayashi Y. The StyletScope facilitates tracheal intubation with the GlideScope. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 2006; 53: 1263-4.
24. Williams D, Ball DR. Palatal perforation associated with McGrath videolaryngoscope. Anaesthesia 2009; 64: 1114-5.
25. Stout DM, Bishop MJ, Dwersteg JF, Cullen BF. Correlation of endotracheal tube size with sore throat and hoarseness following general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 419-21. (Pubitemid 18077428)
26. Koyama Y, Nishihama M, Inagawa G, et al. Comparison of haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation using the Airway Scope® and Macintosh laryngoscope in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anaesthesia 2011; 66: 895-900.