Ecological rationality: A framework for understanding and aiding the aging decision maker

Frontiers in Neuroscience

Volumn , Issue FEB, 2012, Pages

  Mata, Rui ^a   Pachu, Thorsten ^a   von Helversen, Bettina ^a   Hertwig, Ralph ^a   Rieskamp, Jörg ^a   Schooler, Lael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aging; Decision making; Ecological rationality; Strategy execution; Strategy selection

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AGING; ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGICAL RATIONALITY; ENVIRONMENT; EPISODIC MEMORY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING DISORDER; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROMODULATION; PARIETAL CORTEX; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORKING MEMORY;

EID: 84862208416     PISSN: 16624548     EISSN: 1662453X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00019     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Baltes, P. B. (1997). On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny: selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. Am. Psychol. 52, 366-380.
2. Bröder, A. (2000). Assessing the empirical validity of the "take-the-best" heuristic as a model of human probabilistic inference. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 26, 1332-1346.
3. Bröder, A. (2003). Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox" influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 611-625.
4. Bröder, A., and Schiffer, S. (2003). "Take the best" versus simultaneous feature matching: probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 277-293.
5. Bröder, A., and Schiffer, S. (2006). Adaptive flexibility and maladaptive routines in selecting fast and frugal decision strategies. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32, 904-918.
6. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A., and Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence (A-DMC). J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 938-956.
7. Cicero. (1909-1914). On Old Age, Vol. 9, Part 2, trans. E. S. Shuckburgh. New York: P. F. Collier and Son.
8. Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Am. Psychol. 34, 571-582.
9. Dieckmann, A., and Rieskamp, J. (2007). The influence of information redundancy on probabilistic inferences. Mem. Cognit. 35, 1801-1813.
10. Garcia-Retamero, R., and Dhami, M. K. (2009). Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 16, 163-169.
11. Gigerenzer, G., and Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences. Top. Cog n. S c i. 1, 107-143.
12. Gigerenzer, G., and Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 451-482.
13. Gigerenzer, G., and Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychol. Rev. 103, 650-669.
14. Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, H., and Pachur, T. (2011). Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
15. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., and The ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Goldstein, D. G., and Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: the recognition heuristic. Psy-chol. Rev. 109, 75-90.
17. Hanoch, Y., Wood, S., and Rice, T. (2007). Bounded rationality, emotions and older adult decision making: not so fast and yet so frugal. Hum. Dev. 50, 333-358.
18. Hertwig, R., and Todd, P. M. (2003). "More is not always better: the benefits of cognitive limits," in Thinking: Psychological Perspectives on Reasoning, Judgment and Decision Making, eds D. Hardman and L. Macchi (Chichester: Wiley), 213-231.
19. Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., and Lindenberger, U. (2009). Enrichment Effects on Adult Cognitive Development: Can the Functional Capacity of Older Adults be Preserved and Enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Vol. 9, Whole No. 1. Washington, DC: Association for Psychological Science.
20. Hibbard, J. H., and Peters, E. (2003). Supporting informed consumer health care choices: data presentation approaches that facilitate the use of information in choice. Annu. Rev. Public Health 24, 413-433.
21. Hills, T., and Hertwig, R. (2011). Why aren't we smarter already? Evolutionary trade-offs and cognitive enhancements. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 373-377.
22. Hogarth, R. M., and Karelaia, N. (2007). Heuristic and linear models of judgment: matching rules and environments. Psychol. Rev. 114, 733-758.
23. Khader, P., Pachur, T., Meier, S., Bien, S., Jost, K., and Rösler, F. (2011). Memory-based decision making with heuristics: evidence for a controlled activation of memory representations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 3540-3554.
24. Lemaire, P. (2010). Cognitive strategy variations during aging. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 363-369.
25. Mata, R., Helversen, B., and Rieskamp, J. (2010). Learning to choose: cognitive aging and strategy selection learning in decision making. Psychol. Aging 25, 299-309.
26. Mata, R., and Nunes, L. (2010). When less is enough: cognitive aging, information search, and decision quality in consumer choice. Psychol. Aging 25, 289-298.
27. Mata, R., Schooler, L., and Rieskamp, J. (2007). The aging decision maker: cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psy-chol. Aging 22, 796-810.
28. Mata, R., von Helversen, B., Karlsson, L., and Cüpper, L. (2011a). Adult age differences in categorization and multiple-cue judgment. Dev. Psy-chol. PMID: 22059450. [Epub ahead of print].
29. Mata, R., Josef, A., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., and Hertwig, R. (2011b). Age differences in risky choice: a meta-analysis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1235, 18-29.
30. Mell, T., Wartenburger, I., Marschner, A., Villringer, A., Reischies, F. M., and Heekeren, H. R. (2009). Altered function of ventral striatum during reward-based decision making in old age. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 3:34. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.034. 2009
31. Merritt, A., Karlsson, L., and Cokely, E. T. (2010). "Category learning and adaptive benefits of aging," in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Portland.
32. Mutter, S. A., Strain, L. M., and Plumlee, L. F. (2007). The role of age and prior beliefs in contingency judgment. Mem. Cognit. 35, 875-884.
33. Newell, B. R. (2005). Re-visionsof rationality? Trends Cogn. Sci. (Regul. Ed.) 9, 11-15.
34. Nyberg, L., and Bäckman, L. (2010). "Memory changes and the aging brain: a multimodal imaging approach," in Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, 7th Edn, eds K. W. Schaie and S. L. Willis (San Diego: Elsevier Press), 121-133.
35. Pachur, T. (2010). Recognition-based inference: when is less more in the real world? Psychon. Bull. Rev. 17, 589-598.
36. Pachur, T. (2011). The limited value of precise tests of the recognition heuristic. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 6, 413-422.
37. Pachur, T., and Hertwig, R. (2006). On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32, 983-1002.
38. Pachur, T., Mata, R., and Schooler, L. (2009). Cognitive aging and the adaptive use of recognition in decision making. Psychol. Aging 24, 901-915.
39. Pachur, T., Todd, P. M., Gigeren-zer, G., Schooler, L. J., and Goldstein, D. G. (2011). The recognition heuristic: a review of theory and tests. Front. Cogn. Sci. 2:147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011. 00147
40. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., and Johnson, E. J. (1993). The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Pohl, R. (2006). Empirical tests or the recognition heuristic. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 19, 251-271.
42. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., and McKoon, G. (2007). Application of the diffusion model to two-choice tasks for adults 75-90 years old. Psychol. Aging 22, 56-66.
43. Rieskamp, J. (2006). Perspectives of probabilistic inferences: reinforcement learning and an adaptive network compared. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 32, 1355-1370.
44. Rieskamp, J. (2008). The importance of learning when making inferences. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 3, 261-277.
45. Rieskamp, J., and Hoffrage, U. (2008). Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 127, 258-276.
46. Rieskamp, J., and Otto, P. E. (2006). SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 135, 207-236.
47. Rodrigue, K. M., and Kennedy, K. M. (2010)." The cognitive consequences of structural changes to the aging Brain," in Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, 7th Edn, eds K. W. Schaie and S. L. Willis (San Diego: Elsevier Press), 121-133.
48. Rosburg, T., Mecklinger, A., and Frings, C. (2011). When the brain decides: a familiarity-based approach to the recognition heuristic as evidenced by event-related brain potentials. Psychol. Sci. 22, 1527-1534.
49. Samanez-Larkin, G. R., Wagner, A. D., and Knutson, B. (2011). Expected value information improves financial risk taking across the adult life span. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 6, 207-217.
50. Schooler, L. J., and Hertwig, R. (2005). How forgetting aids heuristic inference. Psychol. Rev. 112, 610-628.
51. Shanteau, J. (1992). How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 81, 75-86.
52. Spreng, R. N., Wojtowicz, M., and Grady, C. (2010). Reliable differences in brain activity between young and old adults: a quantitative meta-analysis across multiple cognitive domains. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 1178-1194.
53. Thaler, R. H., and Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nugde: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
54. Todd, P., Gigerenzer, G., and the ABC Research Group (in press). Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. New York: Oxford University Press.
55. Volz, K. G., Schooler, L. J., Schubotz, R. I., Raab, M., Gigerenzer, G., and von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Why you think Milan is larger than Mod-ena: neural correlates of the recognition heuristic. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 1924-1936.
56. Volz, K. G., Schooler, L. J., and von Cramon, D. Y. (2010). It just felt right: the neural correlates of the fluency heuristic. Conscious. Cogn. 19, 829-837.
57. Worthy, D. A., and Maddox, W. T. (2012). Age-based differences in strategy use in choice tasks. Front. Neurosci. 5:145. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00145