A comprehensive dataset for evaluating approaches of various meta-learning tasks

ICPRAM 2012 - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 273-276

  Reif, Matthias ^a  

^a GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Algorithm selection; Classification; Dataset; Meta learning; Pattern recognition; Ranking

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM SELECTION; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; DATA SETS; EVALUATING APPROACH; META-FEATURES; META-LEARNING APPROACH; METALEARNING; OPTIMAL PARAMETER; RANKING; REPRODUCIBILITIES; TRAINING TIME;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 84862192698     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Ali, S. and Smith, K. A. (2006). On learning algorithm selection for classification. Applied Soft Computing, 6:119-138.
2. Asuncion, A. and Newman, D. (2007). UCI machine learning repository. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html University of California, Irvine, School of Information and Computer Sciences.
3. Bensusan, H. and Giraud-Carrier, C. (2000a). Casa batl is in passeig de grcia or how landmark performances can describe tasks. In Proceedings of the ECML-00 Workshop on Meta-Learning: Building Automatic Advice Strategies for Model Selection and Method Combination, pages 29-46.
4. Bensusan, H. and Giraud-Carrier, C. G. (2000b). Discovering task neighbourhoods through landmark learning performances. In PKDD '00: Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 325-330, London, UK. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
5. Bensusan, H. and Kalousis, A. (2001). Estimating the predictive accuracy of a classifier. In De Raedt, L. and Flach, P., editors, Machine Learning: ECML 2001, volume 2167 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 25-36. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
6. Brazdil, P., Soares, C., and da Costa, J. P. (2003). Ranking learning algorithms: Using IBL and meta-learning on accuracy and time results. Machine Learning, 50(3):251-277.
7. Brazdil, P. B. and Soares, C. (2000). Zoomed ranking: Selection of classification algorithms based on relevant performance information. In In Proceedings of Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 4th European Conference, pages 126-135.
8. Engels, R. and Theusinger, C. (1998). Using a data metric for preprocessing advice for data mining applications. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-98, pages 430-434. John Wiley & Sons.
9. Gama, J. and Brazdil, P. (1995). Characterization of classification algorithms. In Pinto-Ferreira, C. and Mamede, N., editors, Progress in Artificial Intelligence, volume 990 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 189-200. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
10. Köpf, C., Taylor, C., and Keller, J. (2000). Meta-analysis: From data characterisation for meta-learning to meta-regression. In Proceedings of the PKDD-00 Workshop on Data Mining, Decision Support, Meta-Learning and ILP.
11. Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., and Euler, T. (2006). Yale: Rapid prototyping for complex data mining tasks. In Ungar, L., Craven, M., Gunopulos, D., and Eliassi-Rad, T., editors, KDD '06: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 935-940, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
12. Peng, Y., Flach, P., Soares, C., and Brazdil, P. (2002). Improved dataset characterisation for meta-learning. In Lange, S., Satoh, K., and Smith, C., editors, Discovery Science, volume 2534 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 193-208. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
13. Pfahringer, B., Bensusan, H., and Giraud-Carrier, C. (2000). Meta-learning by landmarking various learning algorithms. In In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 743-750. Morgan Kaufmann.
14. Reif, M., Shafait, F., and Dengel, A. (2011). Prediction of classifier training time including parameter optimization. In 34th Annual German Conference on Artificial Intelligence KI11, Berlin, Germany.
15. Segrera, S., Pinho, J., and Moreno, M. (2008). Information-theoretic measures for meta-learning. In Corchado, E., Abraham, A., and Pedrycz, W., editors, Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems, volume 5271 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 458-465. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
16. Simonoff, J. S. (2003). Analyzing Categorical Data. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg.
17. Soares, C. and Brazdil, P. B. (2006). Selecting parameters of SVM using meta-learning and kernel matrix-based meta-features. In SAC '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 564-568, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
18. Soares, C., Brazdil, P. B., and Kuba, P. (2004). A meta-learning method to select the kernel width in support vector regression. Machine Learning, 54(3):195-209.
19. Sohn, S. Y. (1999). Meta analysis of classification algorithms for pattern recognition. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 21(11):1137-1144.
20. Vilalta, R., Giraud-carrier, C., Brazdil, P. B., and Soares, C. (2004). Using meta-learning to support data mining. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications, 1(1):31-45.
21. Vlachos, P. (1998). StatLib datasets archive. http://lib.stat.cmu.edu Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University.