Variation for nutritional and cooking properties among Turkish field pea landraces

Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 324-329

  Özer, Sertac ^a   Tümer, Emre ^a   Baloch, Faheem Shehzad ^a   Karaköy, Tolga ^b   Toklu, Faruk ^a   Özkan, Hakan ^a  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Cukurova Agricultural Research Institute   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Field pea; Landraces; Mineral nutrients; Nutritional characteristics; Physicochemical traits; Turkey

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; COPPER; MAGNESIUM; PHOSPHORUS; POTASSIUM; ZINC;

ARTICLE; ASH; COOKING; CULTIVAR; LANDRACE; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL PARAMETERS; PEA; PLANT SEED; PROTEIN CONTENT; SEED SIZE; SEED WEIGHT; TURKEY (REPUBLIC);

EID: 84862180453     PISSN: 14590255     EISSN: 14590263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Sefa-Dedeh, S. and Stanley, D. W. 1979. Textural implications of the microstructure of legumes. Food Technology 33:77-83.
2. FAOSTAT 2008. Information available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/ default.aspx#ancor
3. Costa, G. E. A., Querioz-Monici, K. S., Reis, S. M. P. R. and Oliveira, A. C. 2006. Chemical composition, dietary fibre and resistant starch contents of raw and cooked pea, common bean, chickpea and lentil legumes. Food Chemistry 9:327-330.
4. Hagedorn, D. J. 1984. Compendium of Pea Diseases. University of Wisconsin, Madison.
5. Maxted, N. and Ambrose, M. 2001. Peas (Pisum L.). In Bennett, S. J. (ed.). Plant Genetic Resources of Legumes in the Mediterranean. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp. 81-190.
6. rd edn. Oxford University Press, UK, 328 p.
7. Kaur, S., Singh, N., Sodhi, N. S. and Rana, J. C. 2009. Genotypic diversity in physicochemical, hydrating, pasting and textural properties of kidney bean varieties. Food Chemistry 117:282-289.
8. Özer, S., Karakoy, T., Toklu, F., Baloch, F. S., Kilian, B. and Özkan, H. 2010. Nutritional and physicochemical variation in Turkish kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces. Euphytica 175:237-249.
9. Singh, N., Kaur, N., Rana, J. C. and Sharma, S. K. 2010. Diversity in seed and flour properties in field pea (Pisum sativum) germplasm. Food Chemistry 122:518-525.
10. William, P. C., Nakoul, H. and Singh, K. B. 1983. Relationship between cooking time and some physical characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 34:492-496.
11. AOAC and Helrich, K. (ed.). 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edn. Arlington, VA, USA.
12. SAS Institute 2002. The SAS System for Windows. Release 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
13. Saha, S., Singh, G., Mahajan, V. and Gupta, H. S. 2009. Variability of nutritional and cooking quality in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as a function of genotype. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 64:174-180.
14. Iqbal, A., Khalil, I. A., Ateeq, N. and Khan, M. S. 2006. Nutritional quality of important food legumes. Food Chemistry 97:331-335.
15. Patane, C., Iacoponi, E. and Raccuia, S. A. 2004. Physico-chemical characteristics, water absorption, soaking and cooking properties of some Sicilian populations of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Food, Science and Nutrition 55:547-554.
16. Sharareh, H. 2006. Effects of various processing conditions on nutritional qualities of legumes. The Emerging Bean Magazine, 27 p.
17. Black, R. G., Brouwer, J. B., Meares, C. and Iyer, L. 1998. Variation in physico-chemical properties of field peas (Pisum sativum). Food Research International 31:81-86.
18. Mishra, M. K., Dubey, R. K. and Rao, S. K. 2010. Nutritional composition of field pea (Pisum sativum var. arvense L.). Legume Research 33:146-147.
19. Nikolopoulou, D., Grigorakis, K., Stiasini, M., Alexis, M. N. and Iliadis, K. 2007. Differences in chemical composition of field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars: Effects of cultivation area and year. Food Chemistry 103:847-852.
20. Chavan, U. D., Shahidi, F., Bal, A. K. and McKenzie, D. B. 1999. Physico-chemical properties and nutrient composition of beach pea (Lathyrus maritimus L.). Food Chemistry 66:43-50.
21. Singh, N., Kaur, M., Sandhu, K. S. and Sodhi, N. S. 2004. Physico-chemical, cooking and textural characteristics of some Indian black gram varieties (Phaselous mungo L.). Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 84:977-982.
22. Kaur, M., Singh, N. and Sodhi, N. S. 2005. Physico-chemical, cooking, textural and roasting characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Journal of Food Engineering 69:511-517.
23. Seena, S. and Sridhar, K. R. 2005. Physico-chemical, functional and cooking properties of under explored legumes, Canavalia of the southwest coast of India. Food Research International 38:803-814.
24. Vertucci, C.W. and Leopold, A.C. 1987. Oxidative processes in soybean and pea seeds. Plant Physiology 84:1038-1043.
25. Jood, S., Chauhan, B. M. and Kapoor, A. C. 1998. Contents and digestibility of carbohydrates of chickpea and black gram as affected by domestic processing and cooking. Food Chemistry 30:113-127.
26. Wang, N., Hatcher, D. W., Warkentin, T. D. and Toews, R. 2010. Effect of cultivar and environment on physicochemical and cooking characteristics of field peas (Pisum sativum). Food Chemistry 118:109-115.
27. Clemente, A., Sánchez-Vioque, R., Vioque, J., Bautista, J. and Millán, F. 1998. Effect of processing on water absorption and softening kinetics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). J. Science of Food and Agriculture 78:169-174.
28. Ibáñez, M. V., Rincón, F., Amaro, M. and Martínez, B. 1998. Intrinsic variability of mineral composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Food Chemistry 63:55-60.
29. Khan, H. R., McDonald, G. K. and Rengel, Z. 1998. Assessment of the Zn status of chickpea by plant analysis. Plant and Soil 198:1-9.
30. Arntfield, S. D., Beta, T. and Cenkowski, S. 2010. Hydration properties of different varieties of Canadian field peas (Pisum sativum) from different locations. Food Research International 43:520-525.
31. Yücel C., Baloch, F. S. and Özkan, H. 2009. Genetic analysis of some physical properties of bread wheat grain (Triticum aestivum L. Em Thell). Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 33:525-535.