Meta-analysis of Chicken - Salmonella infection experiments

BMC Genomics

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  te Pas, Marinus F W ^a   Hulsegge, Ina ^a   Schokker, Dirkjan ^a   Smits, Mari A ^a   Fife, Mark ^b   Zoorob, Rima ^c   Endale, Marie Laure ^d   Rebel, Johanna M J ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b INSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HEALTH   (United Kingdom)

^c PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d UMR1313 GÉNÉTIQUE ANIMALE ET BIOLOGIE INTÉGRATIVE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BREEDING LINE; CHICKEN; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE FUNCTION; HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTION; INFECTION SENSITIVITY; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLOSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SEROTYPE; TISSUE SECTION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL SALMONELLOSIS; BIOLOGY; CELL MOTION; DNA MICROARRAY; GENETICS; META ANALYSIS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN DEGRADATION;

GALLUS GALLUS; SALMONELLA;

PROTEASOME; UBIQUITIN;

ANIMALS; CELL MOVEMENT; CHICKENS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEOLYSIS; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 84862173057     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-146     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Hofstad MS, John BH, Calnek BW, Reid WN, Yoder HW. Diseases of Poultry 1992, 65-123. Panima Education Book Agency, New Delhi, Ind, 8.
2. Kabir LSM. Avian Colibacillosis and Salmonellosis: A Closer Look at Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Control and Public Health Concerns. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2010, 7:89-114. 10.3390/ijerph7010089, 2819778, 20195435.
3. Wales AD, Davies RH. A critical review of Salmonella Typhimurium infection in laying Hens. Avian Pathol 2011, 40:429-436. 10.1080/03079457.2011.606799, 21879803.
4. Chappell L, Kaiser P, Barrow P, Jones MA, Johnston C, Wigley P. The immunobiology of avian systemic salmonellosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2009, 128:53-59. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.10.295, 19070366.
5. Guard-Petter J. The chicken, the egg and Salmonella enteritidis. Environ Microbiol 2001, 3:421-430. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2001.00213.x, 11553232.
6. Parker MT. Enteric infections. Topley and Wilson's principles of bacteriology, virology and immunity 1990, 424-446. Edward Arnold, London, Parker MT, Collier LH.
7. Barrow PA, Huggins MB, Lovell MA. Host Specificity of Salmonella Infection in Chickens and Mice Is Expressed In Vivo Primarily at the Level of the Reticuloendothelial System. Infect Immun 1994, 62:4602-4610. 303149, 7927727.
8. Bumstead N, Barrow P. Resistance to Salmonella gallinarium, S. pullorium, and S. enteritidis in inbred lines of chicken. Avian Dis 1993, 37:189-193. 10.2307/1591473, 8452495.
9. Van Hemert S, Hoekman AJW, Smits MA, Rebel JMJ. Gene expression responses to a Salmonella infection in the chicken intestine differ between lines. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2006, 114:247-258. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.08.007, 16978708.
10. Calenge F, Kaiser P, Vignal A, Beaumont C. Genetic control of resistance to salmonellosis and toSalmonellacarrier-state in fowl: a review. Genet Selec Evol 2010, 42:11.
11. Redmond SB, Chuammitri P, Andreasen CB, Palić D, Lamont SJ. Proportion of circulating chicken heterophils and CXCLi2 expression in response to Salmonella enteritidis are affected by genetic line and immune modulating diet. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011, 140:323-328. 10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.01.006, 21295352.
12. Hu J, Bumstead N, Barrow P, Sebastiani G, Olien L, Morgan K, Malo D. Resistance to Salmonellosis in the Chicken Is Linked to NRAMP1 and TNC. Genome Res 1997, 7:693-704.
13. Leveque G, Forgetta V, Morroll S, Smith AL, Bumstead N, Barrow P, Loredo-Osti JC, Morgan K, Malo D. Allelic Variation in TLR4 Is Linked to Susceptibility to Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Infection in Chickens. Infect Immun 2003, 71:1116-1124. 10.1128/IAI.71.3.1116-1124.2003, 148888, 12595422.
14. Sadeyen J-R, Trotereau J, Velge P, Marly J, Beaumont C, Barrow PA, Bumstead N, Lalmanach A-C. Salmonella carrier state in chicken: comparison of expression of immune response genes between susceptible and resistant animals. Microbes Infect 2004, 6:1278-1286. 10.1016/j.micinf.2004.07.005, 15555534.
15. Fife M, Salmon N, Hocking P, Kaiser P. Fine mapping of the chicken salmonellosis resistance locus (SAL1). Anim Genet 2009, 40:871-877. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01930.x, 20597881.
16. Pan Z, Fang Q, Geng S, Kang X, Cong Q, Jiao X. Analysis of immune-related gene expression in chicken peripheral blood mononuclear cells following Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection in vitro. Res Vet Sci 2012,
17. Coble DJ, Redmond SB, Hale B, Lamont SJ. Distinct lines of chickens express different splenic cytokine profiles in response to Salmonella Enteritidis challenge. Poult Sci 2011, 90:1659-1663. 10.3382/ps.2010-01279, 21753200.
18. Galan JE, Cossart P. Host-pathogen interactions: a diversity of themes, a variety of molecular machines. Curr Opin Microbiol 2005, 8:1-3. 10.1016/j.mib.2004.12.015, 15694849.
19. Mattoo S, Lee YM, Dixon JE. Interactions of bacterial effector proteins with host proteins. Curr Opin Immunol 2007, 19:392-401. 10.1016/j.coi.2007.06.005, 17662586.
20. Te Pas MFW, van Hemert S, Hulsegge I, Rebel JMJ, Smits MA. A pathways analysis tool for analyzing microarray data of species with low physiological information. Adv Bioinf 2008, ID 719468.
21. Van Hemert S, Hoekman AJW, Smits MA, Rebel JMJ. Early host gene expression responses to a Salmonella infection in the intestine of chickens with different genetic background examined with cDNA and oligonucleotide microarrays. Comp Biochem Physiol D 2006, 1:292-299.
22. Schokker D, Hoekman AJW, Smits MA, Rebel JMJ. Gene expression patterns associated with chicken jejunal development. Dev Comp Immunol 2009, 33:1156-1164. 10.1016/j.dci.2009.06.002, 19527747.
23. Crhanova M, Hradecka H, Faldynova M, Matulova M, Havlickova H, Sisak F, Rychlik I. Immune response of chicken gut to natural colonization by gut microflora and to Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis infection. Infect Immun 2011, 79:2755-2763. 10.1128/IAI.01375-10, 3191970, 21555397.
24. Marot G, Foulley JL, Mayer CD, Jaffrézic F. Moderated effect size and P-value combinations for microarray meta-analyses. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2692-2699. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp444, 19628502.
25. Editorial: Meta-analysis and moderation. Nature Rev Drugs Disc 2010, 9:747.
26. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis 1985, New York, NY, Academic Press.
27. Stangl DK, Berry DA. Meta-Analysis in Medicine and Health Policy 2000, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
28. Schokker D, Smits MA, Hoekman AJW, Parmentier HK, Rebel JMJ. Effects of Salmonella on spatial-temporal processes of jejunal development in chickens. Dev Comp Immunol 2010, 34:1090-1100. 10.1016/j.dci.2010.05.013, 20541565.
29. Fife MS, Howel JS, Salmon N, Hocking PM, van Diemen PM, Jones MA, Stevens MP, Kaiser P. Genome-wide SNP analysis identifies major QTL for Salmonella colonization in the chicken. Anim Genet 2010, 42:134-140.
30. Barrow PA, Bumstead N, Marston K, Lovell MA, Wigley P. Faecal shedding and intestinal colonization of Salmonella enterica in in-bred chickens: the effect of host genetic background. Epidemiol Infect 2003, 132:117-126.
31. Schokker D, Peters THF, Hoekman AJW, Rebel JMJ, Smits MA. Differences in the early response of hatchlings of different chicken breeding lines to Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection. Poultry Sci 2012, in press.
32. Smyth GK. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 2004, 3:No. 1. Article 3.
33. Ritchie ME, Silver J, Oshlack A, Holmes M, Diyagama D, Holloway A, Smyth GK. A comparison of background correction methods for two-colour microarrays. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2700-2707. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm412, 17720982.
34. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID Bioinformatics Resources. Nat Protoc 2009, 4:44-57.
35. Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucl Acid Res 2009, 37:1-13.
36. http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/
37. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 1995, 57:289-300.
38. Befus AD, Johnston N, Leslie GA, Bienenstock J. Gut-associated lymphoid tissue in the chicken. I. Morphology, ontogeny, and some functional characteristics of Peyer's patches. J Immunol 1980, 125:2626-2632.
39. Barford D, Das AK, Egloff MP. The structure and mechanism of protein phosphatases: insights into catalysis and regulation. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 1998, 27:133-164. 10.1146/annurev.biophys.27.1.133, 9646865.
40. Van Weeren PC, de Bruyn KM, de Vries-Smits AM, van Lint J, Burgering BM. Essential role for protein kinase B (PKB) in insulin-induced glycogen synthase kinase 3 inactivation. Characterization of dominant-negative mutant of PKB. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:13150-13156. 10.1074/jbc.273.21.13150, 9582355.
41. Blom N, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Gupta R, Gammeltoft S, Brunak S. Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics 2004, 4:1633-1649. 10.1002/pmic.200300771, 15174133.
42. Daniel JM, Reynolds AB. Tyrosine phosphorylation and cadherin/catenin function. Bioessays 1997, 19:883-891. 10.1002/bies.950191008, 9363682.
43. Galan JE, Zhou D. Striking a balance: Modulation of the actin cytoskeleton by Salmonella. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:8754-8761. 10.1073/pnas.97.16.8754, 34008, 10922031.
44. Patel JC, Galan JE. Manipulation of the host actin cytoskeleton by Salmonella-all in the name of entry. Curr Opin Microbiol 2005, 8:10-15. 10.1016/j.mib.2004.09.001, 15694851.
45. Neer EJ, Schmidt CJ, Nambudripad R, Smith TF. The ancient regulatory-protein family of WD-repeat proteins. Nature 1994, 371:297-300. 10.1038/371297a0, 8090199.
46. Smith TF, Gaitatzes C, Saxena K, Neer EJ. The WD repeat: a common architecture for diverse functions. Trends Biochem Sci 1999, 24:181-185. 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01384-5, 10322433.
47. Li D, Roberts R. WD-repeat proteins: structure characteristics, biological function, and their involvement in human diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci 2001, 58:2085-2097. 10.1007/PL00000838, 11814058.
48. Pickart CM. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Ann Rev Biochem 2001, 70:503-533. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.503, 11395416.
49. Zhang Y, Higashide W, Dai S, Sherman DM, Zhou D. Recognition and ubiquitination of Salmonella type III effector SopA by a ubiquitin E3 ligase, HsRMA1. J Biol Chem 2005, 280:38682-38688. 10.1074/jbc.M506309200, 16176924.
50. Lotz GP, Brychzy A, Heinz S, Obermann WMJ. A novel HSP90 chaperone complex regulates intracellular vesicle transport. J Cell Sci 2008, 121:717-723. 10.1242/jcs.015610, 18270269.
51. Csermely P, Schnaider T, Soti C, Prohászka Z, Nardai G. The 90-kDa molecular chaperone family: structure, function, and clinical applications. A comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther 1998, 79:129-168. 10.1016/S0163-7258(98)00013-8, 9749880.