Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 24, 2012, Pages 9659-9664

  Tsetsos, Konstantinos ^a,b   Chater, Nick ^c   Usher, Marius ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^d TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Decision making; Decoy effects; Expanded judgement; Value psychophysics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RISK; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RISK;

EID: 84862161239     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1119569109     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bogacz R, Brown E, Moehlis J, Holmes P, Cohen JD (2006) The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychol Rev 113:700-765. (Pubitemid 44629916)
2. de Gardelle V, Summerfield C (2011) Robust averaging during perceptual judgment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13341-13346.
3. Gold JI, Shadlen MN (2007) The neural basis of decision making. Annu Rev Neurosci 30:535-574. (Pubitemid 47218767)
4. Rorie AE, Gao J, McClelland JL, Newsome WT (2010) Integration of sensory and reward information during perceptual decision-making in lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of the macaque monkey. PLoS ONE 5:e9308.
5. Sugrue LP, Corrado GS, Newsome WT (2005) Choosing the greater of two goods: Neural currencies for valuation and decision making. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:363-375. (Pubitemid 40593482)
6. Huber J, Payne JW, Puto C (1982) Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J Consum Res 9:90-98.
7. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1984) Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 39:341-350.
8. Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychol Rev 79:281-299.
9. Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT (1993) Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychol Rev 100:432-459.
10. Russo JE, Dosher BA (1983) Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 9:676-696.
11. Diederich A, Busemeyer JR (2006) Modeling the effects of payoff on response bias in a perceptual discrimination task: Bound-change, drift-rate-change, or two-stage-processing hypothesis. Percept Psychophys 68:194-207. (Pubitemid 44874398)
12. Roe RM, Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT (2001) Multialternative decision field theory: A dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychol Rev 108:370-392. (Pubitemid 33610301)
13. Usher M, McClelland JL (2004) Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice. Psychol Rev 111:757-769. (Pubitemid 38883579)
14. Kiani R, Hanks TD, Shadlen MN (2008) Bounded integration in parietal cortex underlies decisions even when viewing duration is dictated by the environment. J Neurosci 28: 3017-3029. (Pubitemid 351442284)
15. Tsetsos K, Usher M, McClelland JL (2011) Testing multi-alternative decision models with non-stationary evidence. Front Neurosci 5:63.
16. Irwin FW, Smith WAS, Mayfield JF (1956) Tests of two theories of decision in an expanded judgment situation. J Exp Psychol 51:261-268.
17. Vickers D, Burt J, Smith P, Brown M (1985) Experimental paradigms emphasizing state or process limitations. 1. Effects on speed accuracy tradeoffs. Acta Psychol 59(2):129-161.
18. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263-291.
19. Langer T, Sarin R, Weber M (2005) The retrospective evaluation of payment sequences: Duration neglect and peak-and-end effects. J Econ Behav Organ 58:157-175. (Pubitemid 41403722)
20. Hertwig R, Pleskac TJ (2010) Decisions from experience: Why small samples? Cognition 115:225-237.
21. Busemeyer JR, Myung IJ (1992) An adaptive approach to human decision-making: Learning theory, decision theory, and human performance. J Exp Psychol Gen 121(2): 177-194.
22. Anderson NH (1981) Foundations of Information Integration Theory (Academic, New York).
23. Ludvig EA, Spetch ML (2011) Of black swans and tossed coins: Is the description-experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events? PLoS ONE 6:e20262.
24. Shafir E (1993) Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others. Mem Cognit 21:546-556.
25. Shafir E, Simonson I, Tversky A (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49:11-36.
26. Tversky A, Simonson I (1993) Context-dependent preferences. Manage Sci 39: 1179-1189.
27. Louie K, Grattan LE, Glimcher PW (2011) Reward value-based gain control: Divisive normalization in parietal cortex. J Neurosci 31:10627-10639.
28. Stewart N, Chater N, Brown GDA (2006) Decision by sampling. Cognit Psychol 53:1-26. (Pubitemid 43717507)
29. Barth H, et al. (2006) Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children. Cognition 98:199-222. (Pubitemid 43049684)
30. Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR (2005) The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers. Trends Cogn Sci 9:159-162, discussion 162-164.