Cartography of cell morphology in tomato pericarp at the fruit scale

Journal of Microscopy

Volumn 247, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 78-93

  Legland, D ^a,b,c   Devaux, M F ^d   Bouchet, B ^d   Guillon, F ^d   Lahaye, M ^d  

^a Université Paris Saclay   (France)

^b INSTITUT JEAN PIERRE BOURGIN   (France)

^c AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^d INRA   (France)

Author keywords

3D confocal microscopy; Cell morphology; Cell shape; Cell size; Fleshy fruit; Grey level granulometry; Macroscopy imaging; Stereology

Indexed keywords

CELLS; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CYTOLOGY; MAPS; MORPHOLOGY;

3D CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CELL MORPHOLOGY; CELL SHAPES; CELL-SIZE; FLESHY FRUIT; GRANULOMETRIES; GRAY LEVEL GRANULOMETRY; GRAY-LEVEL; MACROSCOPY IMAGING; STEREOLOGY;

FRUITS;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CARTOGRAPHY; CELL STRUCTURE; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; FRUIT; NONHUMAN; PLANT CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOMATO;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 84862160449     PISSN: 00222720     EISSN: 13652818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03623.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allan-Wojtas, P., Sanford, K.A., Mc Rae, K.B. & Carbyn, S. (2003) An integrated micro-structural and sensory approach to describe apple texture. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 128, 381-390.
2. Allende, A., Desmet, M., Vanstreels, E., Verlinden, B.E. & Nicolaï, B.M. (2004) Micromechanical and geometrical properties of tomato skin related to differences in puncture injury susceptibility. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 34, 131-141.
3. Ancin, H., Roysam, B., Dufresne, T.E., Chestnut, M. M., Ridder, G. M., Szarowski, D. H. & Turner, J. N. (1996) Advances in automated 3-D image analysis of cell populations imaged by confocal microscopy. Cytometry 25, 221-234.
4. Baddeley, A. & Jensen, E.B.V. (2002) Introduction to Stereology. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
5. Bengough, A.D., Ijima, M. & Barlow, P.W. (2001) Image analysis of maize root caps - estimating cell numbers from 2-D longitudinal sections Ann. Bot. 87, 693-698.
6. Bertin, N. (2005) Analysis of the tomato fruit growth response to temperature and plant fruit load in relation to cell division, cell expansion and DNA endoreduplication. Ann. Bot. 95, 439-447.
7. Bertin, N., Gautier, H. & Roche, C. (2002) Number of cells in tomato fruit depending on fruit position and source-sink balance during plant development. Plant Growth Regul. 36, 105-112.
8. Bertin, N., Borel, C., Brunel, B., Cheniclet, C. & Causse, M. (2003) Do Genetic make-up and growth manipulation affect tomato fruit size by cell number, or cell size and DNA endoreduplication? Ann. Bot. 92, 415-424.
9. Bourdon, M., Coriton, O., Pirrello, J., et al. (2011) In planta quantification of endoreduplication using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Plant J. 66(6), 1089-1099.
10. Bruce, D.M. (2003) Mathematical modelling of the cellular mechanics of plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 358, 1437-1444.
11. Bünger-Kibler, S. & Bangerth, F. (1982) Relationship between cell number, cell size and fruit size of seeded fruits of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), and those induced parthenocarpically by the application of plant growth regulators. Plant Growth Regul. 1, 143-154.
12. Cano-Medrano, R. & Darnell, R.L. (1997) Cell number and cell size in parthenocarpic vs. pollinated blueberry (Vaccinium ashei) fruits. Ann. Bot. 80, 419-425.
13. Carpenter, A.E., Jones, T.R., Lamprecht, M.R., et al. (2006) CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biol. 7, R100, 1-11.
14. Cheniclet, C., Rong, W.Y., Causse, M., Frangne, N., Bolling, L., Cade, J.P. & Renaudin, J.-P. (2005) Cell expansion and endoreduplication show a large genetic variablilty in pericarp and contribute strongly to tomato fruit growth. Plant Physiol. 139, 1984-1994.
15. Coombe, B.G. (1976) The development of fleshy fruits. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 27, 207-228.
16. Devaux, M.-F., Bouchet, B., Legland, D., Guillon, F. & Lahaye, M. (2008) Macro-vision and grey level granulometry for quantification of tomato pericarp structure. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 47, 199-209.
17. Devaux, M.-F., Sire, A. & Papineau, P. (2009) Macrovision et analyse granulométrique en niveau de gris pour l'analyse histologique de tissus végétaux. Cahiers techniques de l'INRA, Special Issue on Imagery, 93-100. Available at:.
18. Esau, K. (1977) Anatomy of Seed Plants 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
19. Fromont, L., Devaux, M.-F. & Barba, D. (2005) Three-dimensional assembling of confocal images using multiresolution pyramids. In: 9th European Congress for Stereology and Image Analysis (ed. by Jacek Chraponski JCaLW). Polish Society for Stereology, Zakopane (Poland, 71-78).
20. Génard, M., Bertin, N., Borel, C., et al. (2007) Towards a virtual fruit focusing on quality: modelling features and potential uses. J. Exp. Bot. 58(5), 917-928.
21. Gray, J.D., Kolesik, P., Hoj, P.B. & Coombe, B.G. (1999) Confocal measurement of the three-dimensional size and shape of plant parenchyma cells in a developing fruit tissue. Plant J. 19, 229-236.
22. Guillemin, F., Devaux, M.-F. & Guillon, F. (2004) Evaluation of plant histology by automatic clustering based on individual cell morphological features. Image Anal. Stereol. 23, 13-22.
23. Guillon, F., Sully, P., Bouchet, B., Devaux, M.-F., Frasse, P., Jones, B., Bouzayen, M. & Lahaye, M. (2008) Down-regulation of an Auxin response factor in the tomato induces modification of fine pectin structure and tissue architecture. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 273-288.
24. Gundersen, H.J.G., Bendsten, T.F., Korbo, L., et al. (1988) Some new, simple and efficient stereological methods and their use in pathological research and diagnosis. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica (APMIS) 96, 379-394.
25. Guo, M. & Simmons, C.R. (2011) Cell number counts - the fw2.2 and CNR genes and implications for controlling plant fruit and organ size. Plant Sci. 181, 1-7.
26. Harada, T., Kurahashi, W., Yanai, M., Wakasa, Y. & Satoh, T. (2005) Involvement of cell proliferation and cell enlargement in increasing the fruit size of Malus species. Scientia Horticulturae 105, 447-456.
27. Haralick, R.M. (1979) Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc. IEEE 67, 786-804.
28. Higashi, K., Hosoya, K. & Ezura, H. (1999) Histological analysis of fruit development between two melon (Cucumis melo L.-reticulatus) genotypes setting a different size of fruit. J. Exp. Bot. 50, 1593-1597.
29. Jeulin, D. (2002) Modelling random media. Image Anal. Stereol. 21(Supp 1), 31-40.
30. Johnson, L.K. & Malladi, A. (2011) Differences in cell number facilitate fruit size variation in Rabbiteye Blueberry genotypes. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 136, 10-15.
31. Kervrann, C., Legland, D. & Pardini, L. (2004) Robust incremental compensation of the light attenuation with depth in 3D fluorescence microscopy. J. Microsc. 214, 297-314.
32. Konstankiewicz, K., Pawlak, K. & Zdunek, A. (2001) Quantitative method for determining cell structural parameters of plant tissues. Int. Agrophysics 16, 161-164.
33. Lee, K., Avondo, J., Morrison, H., Blot, L., Stark, M., Sharpe, J., Bangham, A. & Coen, E. (2006) Visualizing plant development and gene expression in three dimensions using optical projection tomography. Plant Cell 18, 2145-2156.
34. Legland, D. & Devaux, M.-F. (2009) Détection semi-automatique de cellules de fruits charnus observés par microscopie confocale 2D et 3D. Cahiers techniques de l'INRA. Special Issue on Imagery 7-16. Available at:.
35. Legland, D., Kiêu, K. & Devaux, M.-F. (2007) Computation of Minkowski measures on 2D and 3D binary images. Image Anal. Stereol. 26, 83-92.
36. Legland, D., Devaux, M.-F., Kiêu, K. & Bouchet, B. (2008) Stereological estimation for layered structures based on slabs perpendicular to a surface. J. Microsc. 232, 44-55.
37. Legland, D., Guillon, F., Kiêu, K., Bouchet, B. & Devaux, M.-F. (2010) Stereological estimation of cell wall density of DR12 tomato mutant using 3D confocal imaging. Ann. Bot. 105(2), 265-276.
38. Malladi, A. & Hirst, P.M. (2010) Increase in fruit size of a spontaneous mutant of 'Gala' apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.) is facilitated by altered cell production and enhanced cell size J. Exp. Bot. 61(11), 3003-3013.
39. Mebatsion, H.K., Verboven, P., Verlinden, B.E., Ho, Q.T., Nguyen, T.A. & Nicolaï, B.M. (2006) Microscale modelling of fruit tissue using Voronoi tessellations. Comput. Electronics Agric 52, 36-48.
40. Mebatsion, H.K., Verboven, P., Ho, Q.T., Verlinden, B.E. & Nicolaï, B.M. (2008) Modelling fruit (micro)structures, why and how Trends Food Sci. Technol. 19, 59-66.
41. Mebatsion, H.K., Verboven, P., Melese Endalewa, A., Billen, J., Ho, Q.T. & Nicolaï, B.M. (2009) A novel method for 3-D microstructure modeling of pome fruit tissue using synchrotron radiation tomography images. J. Food Eng. 93(2), 141-148.
42. Mendoza, F., Verboven, P., Mebatsion, H.K., Kerckhof, G., Wevers, M. & Nicolaï, B. (2007) Three-dimensional pore space quantification of apple tissue using X-ray computed microtomography. Planta 226, 1432-2048.
43. Moïse, A. (2009) Construction et organisation des assemblages pariétaux de fruits charnus à textures contrastées, PhD Thesis, February 25th, Nantes University, UFR Sciences et Techniques.
44. Mounet, F., Moing, A., Garcia, V., et al. (2009) Gene and metabolite regulatory network analysis of early developing fruit tissues highlights new candidate genes for the control of tomato fruit composition and development. Plant Physiol. 149, 1505-1528.
45. Musse, M., Quellec, S., Cambert, M., Devaux, M.-F., Lahaye, M. & Mariette, F. (2009) Monitoring the postharvest ripening of tomato fruit using quantitative MRI and NMR relaxometry. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 53, 22-35.
46. Musse, M., De Guio, F., Quellec, Q., Cambert, M., Challois, S. & Davenel, A. (2010) Quantification of microporosity in fruit by MRI at various magnetic fileds: comparison with X-ray microtomography. Magn. Reson. Imaging 28, 1525-1534.
47. Ohser, J., Steinbach, B. & Lang, C. (1998) Efficient texture analysis of binary images. J. Microsc. 192, 20-28.
48. Olmstead, J.W. & Iezzoni, A.F. (2007) Genotypic differences in sweet cherry fruit size are primarily a function of cell number. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 132, 697-703.
49. Pieczywek, P.M, Zdunek, A. & Umeda, M. (2011) Study on parameterisation of plant tissue microstructure by confocal microscopy for finite elements modelling. Comput. Electronics Agric. 78, 98-105.
50. Quilot, B. & Génard, M. (2008) Is competition between mesocarp cells of peach fruits affected by the percentage of wild species genome? J. Plant Res. 121, 55-63.
51. Rosati, A., Caporali, S., Hammami, S.B., Moreno-Alías, I., Paoletti, A. & Rapoport, H.F. (2011) Differences in ovary size among olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars are mainly related to cell number, not to cell size. Scientia Horticulturae 130(1), 185-190.
52. Serra, J. (1982) Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology. Volume 1, Academic Press, London.
53. Soille, P. (2003) Morphological Image Analysis. Springer, New York.
54. Stuppy, W.H., Maisano, J.A., Colbert, M.W., Rudall, P.J. & Rowe, T.B. (2003) Three-dimensional analysis of plant structure using high-resolution X-ray computed tomography. Trends Plant Sci. 8(1), 2-6.
55. Tao, S., Khanizadeh, S., Zhang, H., & Shang, S. (2009) Anatomy, ultrastructure and lignin distribution of stone cells in two Pyrus species. Plant Sci. 176, 413-419.
56. Xin, Y., Chen, F., Yang, H., Zhang, P., Deng, Y. & Yang, B. (2010) Morphology, profile and role of chelate-soluble pectin on tomato properties during ripening. Food Chem. 121, 372-380.
57. Zanchin, A., Bonghi, C., Casadoro, G., Ramina, A. & Rascio, N. (1994) Cell enlargement and cell separation during peach fruit development. Int. J. Plant Sci. 155, 49-56.
58. Zdunek, A. & Umeda, M. (2005) Influence of cell size and cell wall volume fraction on failure properties of potato and carrot tissue. J. Texture Stud. 36, 25-43.
59. Zhang, C., Tanabe, K., Wang, S., Tamura, F., Yoshida, A. & Matsumoto, K. (2006) The impact of cell division and cell enlargement on the evolution of fruit size in Pyrus pyrifolia. Ann. Bot. 98, 537-543.