Properties of Bayesian student model for INQPRO

Applied Intelligence

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 391-406

  Ting, Choo Yee ^a   Phon Amnuaisuk, Somnuk ^a  

^a MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Bayesian networks; Intelligent tutoring systems; Scientific inquiry learning; Student modeling

Indexed keywords

CONSTRUCTION APPROACHES; DYNAMIC BAYESIAN NETWORKS; EXPLORATORY LEARNING; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; MODEL COMPARISON; OPTIMAL RESULTS; SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY; SKILL ACQUISITION; STUDENT MODELING; STUDENT MODELS;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84862125019     PISSN: 0924669X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-010-0267-7     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Horvitz E, Breese J, Heckerman D, Hovel D, Rommelse K (1998) The Lumiere project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. In: Proceedings of 14th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence.
2. Horvitz E, Jacobs A, Hovel D (1999) Attention-sensitive alerting. In: Proceedings of UAI 1999. pp 305-313.
3. Ardissono L, Goy A (2000) Tailoring the interaction with users in web stores. J User Model User-Adapt Int 10(4): 251-303. (Pubitemid 32253877)
4. Bunt A, Conati C (2003) Probabilistic student modelling to improve exploratory behaviour. J User Model User-Adapt Int 13(3): 269-309.
5. Conati C (2002) Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games. J Appl Artif Intell 16(7-8): 555-575. (Pubitemid 35019458)
6. Ting CY, Phon-Amnuaisuk S, Chong YK (2008) Modeling and intervening across time in scientific inquiry exploratory learning environment. J Educ Tech Soc 11(3): 239-258.
7. Murray RC, VanLehn K, Mostow J (2004) Looking ahead to select tutorial actions: a decision-theoretic approach. J Artif Intell Educ 14(3-4): 235-278.
8. Pek P, Poh KL (2005) Making decisions in an intelligent tutoring system. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 4(2): 207-233. (Pubitemid 44099638)
9. Paolucci M, Suthers D, Weiner A (1996) Automated advice giving strategies for scientific inquiry. In: Frasson C, Gauthier G, Lesgold A (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on intelligent tutoring systems.
10. Linn MC (2000) Designing the knowledge integration environment. Int J Sci Educ 22(8): 781-796.
11. Reiser BJ, Tabak I, Sandoval WA, Smith B, Steinmuller F, Leone TJ (2001) BGuILE: strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In: Carver SM, Klahr D (eds) Cognition and instruction: twenty five years of progress. Erlbaum, Mahvah.
12. Veermans KH, Van Joolingen WR (2004) Combining heuristics and formal methods in a tool for supporting simulation-based discovery learning. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3220:217-226. (Pubitemid 39751684)
13. Pryor A, Soloway E (1997) Foundation of science: using technology to support authentic science learning. http://hi-ce.eecs.umich.edu/papers/.
14. Dragon T, Woolf BP, Marshall D, Murray T (2006) Coaching within a domain independent inquiry environment. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4053:144-153. (Pubitemid 44117587)
15. Shute J V, Glaser R (1990) A large-scale evaluation of an intelligent discovery world: Smithtown. Interact Learn Environ 1:51-77.
16. Jitnah N (1993) Bayesian poker. Honours thesis, Dept. of Computer Science. Monash University.
17. Kennett R, Korb K, Nicholson A (2001) Seabreeze prediction using Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of PAKDD 2001, pp 148- 153. (Pubitemid 33255104)
18. Spirtes P, Glymour C, Scheines, R (1993) Causation, Prediction and search. In: Lecture notes in statistics. Springer, Heidelberg.
19. Wallace CS, Korb KB (1999) Learning linear causal models by MML sampling. In: Gammerman A (ed) Causal models and intelligent data management. Springer, Heidelberg.
20. Kjaerulff U, Madsen A (2007) Bayesian networks and influence diagrams: a guide to construction and analysis. Springer, New York.
21. Pearl J (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
22. Ting CY, Arshad MY (2000) Penggunaan simulasi komputer bagi merealisasikan fenomena tidak sahih: Satu alternative mewujudkan konflik kognitif dalam pembelajaran sains. J Pendidik Univ Teknol Malays 6(1):1-21.
23. Chi MT, Roscoe RD (2002) The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In: Limon M, Mason L (eds) Reconsidering conceptual change: issues in theory and practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 3-27.
24. Van der Gaag LC, Renooij S, Witteman CLM, Aleman BMP, Taal BG (1999) How to elicit many probabilities. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on uncertainties in artificial intelligence, pp 647-654.
25. Druzdel MJ, Van der Gaag LC (2000) Building Bayesian networks: where do the numbers come from? IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 12:481-486.
26. VanLehn K (1996) Conceptual and meta learning during coached problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference intelligent tutoring systems, Montreal, Canada.
27. Schafer R, Weyrath T (1997) Assessing temporally variable user properties with dynamic Bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference UM97, pp 377-388.
28. Ting CY, Phon-Amnuaisuk S (2009) Optimal dynamic decision network model for scientific inquiry learning environment. Appl Intell, doi: 10.1007/s10489-009-0174-y.
29. Ting CY, Phon-Amnuaisuk S (2009) Log data approach to acquisition of optimal Bayesian learner model. Am J Appl Sci 6(5):913- 921.