Regional double dividend from environmental tax reform: An application for the Italian economy

Research in Economics

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 273-283

  Ciaschini, Maurizio ^a   Pretaroli, Rosita ^a   Severini, Francesca ^a   Socci, Claudio ^a  

^a Dipartimento di Studi sullo Sviluppo Economico   (Italy)

Author keywords

CGE analysis; Environmental taxation; Social Accounting Matrix

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862124658     PISSN: 10909443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rie.2012.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. André F.J., Cardenete M.A., Velàzquez E. Performing an environmental tax reform in a regional economy, a computable general equilibrium approach. The Annals of Regional Science 2005, 375-392.
2. Armington P.S. A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers 1969, 159-178.
3. Baumol W., Oates W. The Theory of Environmental Policy 1988, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Bjertbaes G.H., Faehn T. Energy taxation in a small, open economy: social efficiency gains versus industrial concerns. Energy Economics 2008, 2050-2071.
5. Böhringer, C., Pahlke, A., Rutherford, T., 1997. Environmental tax reforms and the prospect for a double dividend, . http://debrue.colorado.edu/.
6. Böhringer C., Boeters S., Feil M. Taxation and unemployment: an applied general equilibrium approach. Economic Modelling 2005, 22:81-108.
7. Bor Y.J., Huang Y. Energy taxation and the double dividend effect in Taiwan's energy conservation policy-an empirical study using a computable general equilibrium model. Energy Policy 2010, 38:2086-2100.
8. Bovenberg A., De Mooij R. Environmental taxes, international capital mobility and inefficient tax systems: tax burden versus tax shifting. International Tax and Public Finance 1998, 5:7-39.
9. Bovenberg A., Goulder L. Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general equilibrium analysis. American Economic Review 1996, 86:985-1000.
10. Bovenberg A., Goulder L. Costs of environmentally motivated taxes in the presence of other taxes: general equilibrium analysis. National Tax Journal 1997, 70:59-87.
11. Bovenberg A., Goulder L. Environmental taxation and regulation. Handbook of Public Economics 2002, 1471-1545. Elsevier, Amsterdam, North Holland, (Chapter 23). A. Auerbach, M. Feldstein (Eds.).
12. CE, 1994. Orientamenti per l'UE in materia di indicatori ambientali e di contabilità verde nazionale-Integrazione di sistemi di informazione ambientale ed economica, Technical report, Commissione Europea, 21 Dicembre.
13. Ciaschini M., Socci C. Income distribution and output change: macro multiplier approach. Economic Growth and Distribution: On the Nature and Cause of the Wealth of Nations 2006, Edward Elgar. N. Salvadori (Ed.).
14. Ciaschini M., Socci C. Bi-regional SAM linkages: a modified backward and forward dispersion approach. Reviews of Urban and Regional Development Studies 2007, 19:233-254.
15. Gimenez E.L., Rodriguez M. Reevaluating the first and the second dividends of environmental tax reforms. Energy Policy 2010, 38:6654-6661.
16. Glomm G., Kawaguchi D., Sepulveda F. Green taxes and double dividends in a dynamic economy. Journal of Policy Modeling 2008, 30:19-32.
17. Goulder L. Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an intertemporal general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 29:271-297.
18. ISTAT, 2008. Le emissioni atmosferiche delle attività produttive e delle famiglie Anni 1990-2005, Annali di Statistica.
19. Manresa A., Sancho F. Implementing a double dividend: recycling ecotaxes towards lower labour taxes. Energy Policy 2005, 33:1577-1585.
20. Parry I.W. Are emission permits regressive?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2004, 47:364-387.
21. Pearce D. The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. The Economic Journal 1991, 101:938-948.
22. Pissarides C.A. The impact of employment tax cuts on unemployment and wages; the role of unemployment benefits and tax structure. European Economic Review 1998, 42:155-183.
23. Pretaroli, R., Severini, F., 2008. Dalla SAM al Modello Computazionale CGE, in: Modelli computazionali per la valutazione dell'impatto del Federalismo fiscsale sulla finanza locale ed., Ministerodell'Interno, Ministero dell'Interno, pp. 29-71 (Chapter 3).
24. Pretaroli, R., Socci, C., 2008. Produzione e distribuzione del reddito in una SAM biregionale, in: Modelli computazionali per la valutazione dell'impatto del Federalismo fiscsale sulla finanza locale ed., Ministerodell'Interno, Ministero dell'Interno, pp. 29-71 (Chapter 3).
25. Pretaroli R., Severini F. Assessing the effect of a value added tax policy on wine sectors. Enometrica-International Review of EAWE 2009, 2:41-51.
26. Radulescu D., Stimmelmayr M. The impact of the 2008 German corporate tax reform: a dynamic CGE analysis. Economic Modelling 2010, 27:454-467.
27. Schneider K. Involuntary unemployment and environmental policy: the double dividend hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 1997, 99:45-49.
28. Takeda S. The double dividend from carbon regulations in Japan. The Japanese and International Economies 2007, 21:336-364.
29. Van der Werf, E., 2007. Production function for climate policy modeling: an empirical analysis, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Papers, 50, . http://www.bepress.com/feem/paper50.
30. 2 pollution and poverty while promoting growth. The Energy Journal 2006, 27:113-141.