Taxation and unemployment: An applied general equilibrium approach

Economic Modelling

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 81-108

  Böhringer, Christoph ^a,b   Boeters, Stefan ^a   Feil, Michael ^c  

^a CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c INSTITUTE FOR EMPLOYMENT RESEARCH IAB   (Germany)

Author keywords

Applied general equilibrium; Labour tax policy; Wage bargaining

Indexed keywords

EID: 12144255119     PISSN: 02649993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2004.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abowd J.M. Kramarz F. Margolis D.N. High wage workers and high wage firms Econometrica 67 1999 251-333
2. Acemoglu D. Good jobs versus bad jobs Journal of Labor Economics 19 2001 1-21
3. Ballard, C., 2000. How many hours are in a simulated day? The effects of time endowment on the results of tax-policy simulation models, Discussion Paper, Michigan State University.
4. Ballard, C.L., Fullerton, D., Shoven, J.B., Whalley, J., 1985. General Equilibrium Model for Tax Policy Evaluation. National Bureau of Economic Research. The University of Chicago Press.
5. Bernheim, D.B., 1999. Taxation and saving, NBER Working Paper 7061.
6. Blanchflower D.G. Oswald A.J. The Wage Curve, Cambridge (Mass.) 1994 MIT Press London
7. BMF, 2003. http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Anlage18360/ Datensammlung-zur-Steuerpolitik-2003.pdf.
8. Boeters, S., 2002. Tax progressivity and the trade union's fallback-option. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 02-15. Mannheim.
9. Böhringer C. Wiegard W. Starkweather C. Ruocco A. Green tax reforms and computational economics: A do-it-yourself approach Computational Economics 22 2003 75-109
10. Böhringer, C., Rutherford, T.F., Wiegard, W., 2003b. Computable general equilibrium analysis: Opening a black box. ZEW Discussion Paper 03-56. Mannheim.
11. Borjas G.J. Labor Economics 2nd ed. 2000 McGraw-Hill Boston, MA
12. Bovenberg A.L. Graafland J.J. de Mooij R.A. Tax reform and the Dutch labor market: An applied general equilibrium approach Journal of Public Economics 78 2000 193-214
13. Bundesbank Deutsche Annual accounts of West-German enterprises (1971-1996) 1999 Special Statistical Publication 5 Frankfurt am Main
14. Bundesminister der Finanzen Deutsche. ekanntmachung der Allgemeinen Lohnsteuertabellen 1993 1992 Bundesanzeiger-Verl.-Ges Köln
15. Buslei H. Steiner V. Beschaeftigungseffekte von Lohnsubventionen im Niedriglohnbereich 1999 Nomos Baden-Baden
16. EIRO, 2002. Industrial relations in the EU, Japan and USA, 2001. http://www.eiro.eurofound.ie/2002/12/feature/TN0212101F.html .
17. Falk, M., Koebel, B., 1997. The demand of heterogeneous labour in Germany. ZEW Discussion Paper 97-28. Mannheim.
18. Fehr H. Wiegard W. Numerische Gleichgewichtsmodelle: Grundstruktur Anwendungen und Erkenntnisgehalt, Ökonomie und Gesellschaft, Jahrbuch 13: Experiments in Economics 1996 297-339 Campus-Verlag Frankfurt
19. Fuest, C., Huber, B., 1998. Tax progression and human capital in imperfect labour markets, EPRU Discussion Paper 1998-03.
20. Fuest C. Huber B. Is tax progressions really good for employment? A model with endogenous hours of work Labour Economics 7 2000 79-93
21. Goerke L. Taxes in an efficiency wage economy in the short-run and in the long-run Finanzarchiv 54 1997 447-470
22. Graafland J.J. deMooij R.A. Nibbelink A.G.H. Nieuwenhuis A. MIMICing Tax Policies and the Labour Market 2001 Elsevier Amsterdam
23. Haisken-DeNew, J.P., Schmidt, C.M., 1999. Industry wage differentials revisited: A longitudinal comparison of Germany and USA (1984-1996). IZA Discussion Paper, No. 98. Bonn.
24. Hamermesh D.S. Labor Demand, Princeton 1993 Princeton Univ. Press New Jersey
25. Hoel M. Efficiency wages and income taxes Journal of Economics 51 1990 89-99
26. Holzer H. Katz L. Krueger A. Job queues and wages Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 1991 739-768
27. Hutton J.P. Ruocco A. Tax reform and employment in Europe International Tax and Public Finance 6 1999 263-287
28. Kehoe, P.J., Kehoe, T.J., 1994. A Primer on Static Applied General Equilibrium Models, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, Spring.
29. Koskela, E., 2001. Labour taxation and employment in trade union models: A partial survey, Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, No. 19.
30. Koskela E. Vilmunen J. Tax progression is good for employment in popular models of trade union behaviour Labour Economics 3 1996 65-80
31. Lockwood B. Manning A. Wage setting and the tax system: Theory and evidence for the United Kingdom Journal of Public Economics 52 1993 1-29
32. OECD OECD Employment Outlook 2001
33. Pereira A.M. Shoven J.B. Survey of dynamic computational general equilibrium models for tax policy evaluation Journal of Policy Modeling 10 1992 401-426
34. Pissarides C.A. Equilibrium Unemployment Theory 1990 Basil Blackwell Oxford
35. Pissarides C.A. The impact of employment tax cuts on unemployment and wages; the role of unemployment benefits and tax structure European Economic Review 42 1998 155-183
36. Rutherford, T., 1995. Constant elasticity of substitution functions: some hints and useful formulae, Notes prepared for GAMS General Equilibrium Workshop in Boulder. Colorado (http://www.gams.com/solvers/ mpsge/cesfun.htm).
37. Shoven J.B. Whalley J. Applied general-equilibrium models of taxation and international trade: An introduction and survey Journal of Economic Literature 22 1984 1007-1051
38. Shoven J.B. Whalley J. Applying General Equilibrium 1992 Cambridge Univ. Press Cambridge
39. SOEP Group The German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) after more than 15 years-overview In: Holst E. Lillard D.R. DiPrete T.A. (Eds.)Proceedings of the 2000 Fourth International Conference of German Socio-Economic Panel Study Users (GSOEP2000) Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung (Quarterly Journal of Economic Research) vol. 70 2001 7-14
40. Sørensen P.B. Public finance solutions to the European unemployment problem? Economic Policy 25 1997 223-264
41. Sørensen P.B. Optimal tax progressivity in imperfect labour markets Labour Economics 6 1999 435-452
42. Statistisches Bundesamt, 1995. Series FS 17, R 1, Wirtschaftsrechnungen ausgewählter privater Haushalte.
43. Welsch, H., 2001. Armington elasticities and product diversity in the European community: A comparative assessment of four countries, Working Paper, University of Oldenburg.
44. Weyant J.P. The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation The Energy Journal, Special Issue