Reevaluating the first and the second dividends of environmental tax reforms

Energy Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 6654-6661

  Giménez, Eduardo L ^a   Rodríguez, Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Climate change policy; Double dividend; ETRs

Indexed keywords

A-CARBON; CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES; DOUBLE DIVIDEND; ENVIRONMENTAL TAX REFORM; ETRS; EXXON MOBIL; TOTAL WELFARE; US ECONOMY; WELFARE ANALYSIS;

TAXATION;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL TAX; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; POLICY REFORM; POLLUTION TAX; WELFARE ECONOMICS;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 77957794665     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.035     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aldy J., Pizer W. Issues in designing US climate change policy. The Energy Journal 2009, 30(3):179-209.
2. Bohm P. Environmental taxation and the double dividend: fact or fallacy?. Ecotaxation 1997, 106-124. Earthscan Publications, London. T. O'Riordan (Ed.).
3. Bor, Y.J., Huang, Y., 2010. Energy taxation and the double dividend effect in Taiwan's energy conservation policy. An empirical study using a computable general equilibrium model, Energy Policy 38 (5), 2086-2100.
4. Bovenberg A. Green tax reforms and the double dividend: an updated reader's guide. International Tax and Public Finance 1999, 6:421-443.
5. Bovenberg A., Goulder L. Optimal environmental taxation in the presence of other taxes: general-equilibrium analyses. American Economic Review 1996, 86(4):985-1000.
6. Bovenberg A., Goulder L. Environmental taxation and regulation. Handbook in Public Economics Vol. 3 2002, 1471-1545. Elsevier Science, North-Holland. A.J. Auerbach, M. Feldstein (Eds.).
7. Bovenberg A., de Mooij R. Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. American Economic Review 1994, 94(4):1085-1089.
8. Bovenberg A.L., Van der Ploeg F. Consequences of environmental tax reform for unemployment and welfare. Environmental and Resource Economics 1998, 12(2):137-150.
9. Burtraw D., Toman M. Ancillary benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation policies. Climate Change, Economics and Policy, Resources for the Future 2001, M. Toman (Ed.).
10. Callan T., Lyons S., Scott S., Tol R., Verde S. The distributional implications of a carbon tax in Ireland. Energy Policy 2009, 37:407-412.
11. Chiroleu-Assouline M., Fodha M. Double dividend with involuntary unemployment: efficiency and intergenerational equity. Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 31(4):389-403.
12. Fernández E., Pérez R., Ruiz J. Double dividend, dynamic Laffer effects and public abatement. Economic Modelling 2010, 27(3):656-665.
13. Garbaccio R., Ho M., Jorgenson D.W. Controlling carbon emissions in China. Environment and Development Economics 1999, 4:493-518.
14. Glomm G., Kawaguchi D., Sepulveda F. Green taxes and double dividends in a dynamic economy. Journal of Policy Modeling 2008, 30:19-32.
15. Goulder L.H. Environmental taxation and the 'double dividend': a reader's guide. International Tax and Public Finance 1995, 2(2):157-183.
16. Hakonsen L. A note on green taxes and double dividends. International Tax and Public Finance 2001, 8:75-80.
17. Jorgenson D., Wilcoxen P. Reducing US carbon emissions: an econometric general equilibrium assessment. Resource and Energy Economics 1993, 30:433-439.
18. Lee D., Misiolek W. Substituting pollution taxation for general taxation: some implications for efficiency in pollutions taxation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1986, 13:338-347.
19. Mayeres I., Proost S. Optimal tax and public investment rules for congestion type of externalities. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 1997, 99(2):261-279.
20. Mayeres I., Proost S. Marginal tax reforms, externalities and income distribution. Journal of Public Economics 2001, 79:343-363.
21. Morris G.E., Révész T., Zalai E., Fucskó J. Integrating environmental taxes on local air pollutants with fiscal reform in Hungary: simulations with a computable general equilibrium model. Environment and Development Economics 1999, 4:537-564.
22. Park A., Pezzey J. Variations on the wrong themes? A structured review of the double dividend debate. Environmental Implications of Market-Based Policy Instruments 1999, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. T. Sterner (Ed.).
23. Parry I. Pollution taxes and revenue recycling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 29:364-377.
24. Parry I. Environmental taxes and quotas in the presence of distorting taxes in factor markets. Resource and Energy Economics 1997, 19:203-220.
25. Parry I., Williams R., Goulder L. When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1999, 37:52-84.
26. Patuellia R., Nijkampb P., Pels E. Environmental tax reform and the double dividend: a meta-analytical performance assessment. Ecological Economics 2005, 55:564-583.
27. Pearce D. The role of carbon taxes in adjusting to global warming. The Economic Journal 1991, 101:938-948.
28. Pezzey J.C.V., Park A. Reflections on the double dividend debate. Environmental and Resource Economics 1998, 11(3-4):539-555.
29. Royal Society, 2002. Economic instruments for the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions. Policy Document 26/02.
30. Sandmo A. Optimal taxation in the presence of externalities. Swedish Journal of Economics 1975, 77(1):86-98.
31. Sandmo A. Public finance and the environment. Public Economics and the Environment in an Imperfect World 1995, Kluwer academic Publishers. Bovenberg, Cnossen (Eds.).
32. Schöb, R., 1996. Evaluating tax reforms in the presence of externalities. Oxford Economic Papers 48, pp. 537-555.
33. Schöb R. Environmental taxes and pre-existing distortions: the normalization trap. International Tax and Public Finance 1997, 4:167-176.
34. Springer U. The market for tradable GHG permits under the Kyoto protocol: a survey of model studies. Energy Economics 2003, 25(5):527-551.
35. Springer U., Varilek M. Estimating the price of tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions in 2008-12. Energy Policy 2004, 32(5):611-621.
36. Sterner T. Fuel taxes: an important instrument for climate policy. Energy Policy 2007, 35:3194-3202.
37. Terkla D. The efficiency value of effluent tax revenues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1984, 11:107-123.
38. Tol R. The marginal damage costs of carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment of the uncertainties. Energy Policy 2005, 33(16):2064-2074.
39. Tullock G. Excess benefit. Water Resources Research 1967, 3:643-644.