Power calculations in genetic studies

Cold Spring Harbor Protocols

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 664-674

  Evans, David M ^a   Purcell, Shaun ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOSTATISTICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC MODEL; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PREVALENCE; REVIEW; RISK; SAMPLE SIZE; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STUDY DESIGN; HEREDITY; METHODOLOGY;

BIOSTATISTICS; GENETIC PHENOMENA;

EID: 84862124284     PISSN: 19403402     EISSN: 15596095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/pdb.top069559     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Altshuler D, Brooks LD, Chakravarti A, Collins FS, Daly MJ, Donnelly P. 2005. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437: 1299-1320.
2. Bacanu SA, Devlin B, Roeder K. 2000. The power of genomic control. Am J Hum Genet 66: 1933-1944.
3. Barrett JC, Cardon LR. 2006. Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38: 659-662.
4. Cheung VG, Spielman RS, Ewens KG, Weber TM, Morley M, Burdick JT. 2005. Mapping determinants of human gene expression by regional and genome-wide association. Nature 437: 1365-1369.
5. Devlin B, Risch N. 1995. A comparison of linkage disequilibrium measures for fine-scale mapping. Genomics 29: 311-322.
6. Gauderman WJ. 2002. Sample size requirements for association studies of gene-gene interaction. Am J Epidemiol 155: 478-484.
7. Gordon D, Finch SJ, Nothnagel M, Ott J. 2002. Power and sample size calculations for case-control genetic association tests when errors are present: Application to single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Hered 54: 22-33.
8. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, Haynes C, Henning AK, SanGiovanni JP, Mane SM, Mayne ST, et al. 2005. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science 308: 385-389.
9. Lewontin RC. 1964. The interaction of selection and linkage. I. General considerations; heterotic models. Genetics 49: 49-67.
10. Lin S, Chakravarti A, Cutler DJ. 2004. Exhaustive allelic transmission disequilibrium tests as a new approach to genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 36: 1181-1188.
11. Maraganore DM, de Andrade M, Lesnick TG, Strain KJ, Farrer MJ, Rocca WA, Pant PV, Frazer KA, Cox DR, Ballinger DG. 2005. High-resolution whole-genome association study of Parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet 77: 685-693.
12. Matsuzaki H, Loi H, Dong S, Tsai YY, Fang J, Law J, Di X, Liu WM, Yang G, Liu G, et al. 2004. Parallel genotyping of over 10,000 SNPs using a oneprimer assay on a high-density oligonucleotide array. Genome Res 14: 414-425.
13. McGinnis R, Shifman S, Darvasi A. 2002. Power and efficiency of the TDT and case-control design for association scans. Behav Genet 32: 135-144.
14. Mitra SK. 1958. On the limiting power function of the frequency chi-square test. Ann Math Stat 29: 1221-1233.
15. Ozaki K, Ohnishi Y, Iida A, Sekine A, Yamada R, Tsunoda T, Sato H, Sato H, Hori M, Nakamura Y, Tanaka T. 2002. Functional SNPs in the lymphotoxin-alpha gene that are associated with susceptibility to myocardial infarction. Nat Genet 32: 650-654.
16. Purcell S, Cherny SS, Sham PC. 2003. Genetic Power Calculator: Design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics 19: 149-150.
17. Sachidanandam R, Weissman D, Schmidt SC, Kakol JM, Stein LD, Marth G, Sherry S, Mullikin JC, Mortimore BJ, Willey DL. 2001. (International SNP Map Working Group). A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nature 409: 928-933.
18. Sasieni PD. 1997. From genotypes to genes: Doubling the sample size. Biometrics 53: 1253-1261.
19. Satagopan JM, Elston RC. 2003. Optimal two-stage -genotyping in population-based association studies. Genet Epidemiol 25: 149-157.
20. Satagopan JM, Venkatraman ES, Begg CB. 2004. Two-stage designs for genedisease association studies with sample size constraints. Biometrics 60: 589-597.
21. Satagopan JM, Verbel DA, Venkatraman ES, Offit KE, Begg CB. 2002. Twostage designs for gene-disease association studies. Biometrics 58: 163-170.
22. Schork NJ. 2002. Power calculations for genetic association studies using estimated probability distributions. Am J Hum Genet 70: 1480-1489.
23. Sham PC, Cherny SS, Purcell S, Hewitt JK. 2000. Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data. Am J Hum Genet 66: 1616-1630.
24. Skol AD, Scott LJ, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M. 2006. Corrigendum: Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet 38: 390.
25. Sobell JL, Heston LL, Sommer SS. 1993. Novel association approach for determining the genetic predisposition to schizophrenia: Casecontrol resource and testing of a candidate gene. Am J Med Genet 48: 28-35.
26. Spielman RS, McGinnis RE, Ewens WJ. 1993. Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: The insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). Am J Hum Genet 52: 506-516.
27. Thomas DC, Haile RW, Duggan D. 2005. Recent developments in genomewide association scans: A workshop-summary and review. Am J Hum Genet 77: 337-345.
28. Witte JS, Elston RC, Cardon LR. 2000. On the relative sample size required for multiple comparisons. Stat Med 19: 369-372.