A meta-analysis investigating factors underlying attrition rates in infant ERP studies

Developmental Neuropsychology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 226-252

  Stets, Manuela ^a   Stahl, Daniel ^b   Reid, Vincent M ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; META ANALYSIS; NEWBORN; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS;

BRAIN; DATA COLLECTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE;

EID: 84862103168     PISSN: 87565641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2012.654867     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bahrick, L. E., and, Lickliter, R. 2000. Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 36: 190-201.
2. Bradburn, M. J., Deeks, J. J., and, Altman, D. G. 1998. sbe24: metanAn alternative meta-analysis command. Stata Technical Bulletin, 44: 1-15.
3. Brannon, E. M., Libertus, M. E., Meck, W. H., and, Woldorff, M. G. 2008. Electrophysiological measures of time processing in infant and adult brains: Weber's law holds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20 (2): 193-203. (Pubitemid 351159083)
4. DeBoer, T., Scott, L. S., and, Nelson, C.A. 2007. Methods for acquiring and analyzing infant event-related potentials. In Infant EEG and event-related potentials, Edited by: de Haan, M. 5-37. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
5. de Haan, M., Pascalis, O., and, Johnson, M. H. 2002. Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (2): 199-209. (Pubitemid 34113706)
6. Everitt, B. S. 2003. Modern medical statistics: A practical guide, London, England: Arnold.
7. Friederici, A. D., Friedrich, M., and, Christophe, A. 2007. Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specific. Current Biology, 17: 1208-1211. (Pubitemid 47043431)
8. Gredebck, G., and, Melinder, A. 2010. Infants' understanding of everyday social interactions: A dual process account. Cognition, 114: 197-206.
9. Halit, H., Csibra, G., Volein, A., and, Johnson, M. H. 2004. Face-sensitive cortical processing in early infancy. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45 (7): 1228-1234. (Pubitemid 39255825)
10. Harbord, R., and, Higgins, J. P. T. 2008. Meta-regression in Stata. Stata Journal, 8 (4): 493-519.
11. Hespos, S., Gredebck, G., von Hofsten, C., and, Spelke, E. S. 2009. Occlusion is hard: Comparing predictive reaching for visible and hidden objects in infants and adults. Cognitive Science, 33: 1483-1502.
12. Higgins, J. P. T., and, Thompson, S. G. 2004. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression. Statistics in Medicine, 23 (11): 1663-1682. (Pubitemid 38765338)
13. Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., and, Altman, D. G. 2003. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. British Medical Journal, 327 (7414): 557-560. (Pubitemid 37088507)
14. Hirotani, M., Stets, M., Striano, T., and, Friederici, A. D. 2009. Joint attention helps infants learn new words: Event-related potential evidence. NeuroReport, 20 (6): 600-605.
15. Hoehl, S., and, Wahl, S. 2012. Recording infant ERP data for cognitive research. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37: 187-209.
16. Kobiella, A., Grossmann, T., Reid, V. M., and, Striano, T. 2008. The discrimination of angry and fearful facial expressions in 7-month-old infants: An event-related potential study. Cognition and Emotion, 22 (1): 134-146.
17. Lipsey, M. W., and, Wilson, D. B. 2000. Practical meta-analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Luck, S. J. 2005. Ten simple rules for designing ERP experiments. In Event-related potentials: A methods handbook, Edited by: Handy, T. C. 17-32. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Marshall, P. J., Reeb, B. C., and, Fox, N. A. 2009. Electrophysiological responses to auditory novelty in temperamentally different 9-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 12 (4): 568-582.
20. Marshall, P. J., and, Shipley, T. F. 2009. Event-related potentials to point-light displays of human actions in five-month-old infants. Developmental Neuropsychology, 34 (3): 368-377.
21. Nelson, C. A., and, Collins, P. F. 1991. Event-related potential and looking-time analysis of infants' responses to familiar and novel events: Implications for visual recognition memory. Developmental Psychology, 27 (1): 50-58.
22. Nelson, C. A., Henschel, M., and, Collins, P. F. 1993. Neural correlates of cross-modal recognition memory by 8-month-old human infants. Developmental Psychology, 29 (3): 411-420.
23. Nikkel, L., and, Karrer, R. 1994. Differential effects of experience on the ERP and behavior of 6-month-old infants: Trends during repeated stimulus presentations. Developmental Neuropsychology, 10: 1-11.
24. Parise, E., Reid, V. M., Stets, M., and, Striano, T. 2008. Direct eye-contact influences the neural processing of objects in 5-month-old infants. Social Neuroscience, 3 (2): 141-150.
25. Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, Jr., and, Taylor, M. J. 2000. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: Recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology, 37: 127-152. (Pubitemid 30140280)
26. Reynolds, G. D., and, Guy, M. W. 2012. Brain-behavior relations in infancy: Integrative approaches to examining infant looking behavior and event-related potentials. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37: 210-225.
27. Richards, J. E. 2003. Attention affects the recognition of briefly presented visual stimuli in infants: An ERP study. Developmental Science, 6 (3): 312-328. (Pubitemid 36737466)
28. Saby, J. N., and, Marshall, P. J. 2012. The utility of EEG band power analysis in the study of infancy and early childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37: 253-273.
29. Slaughter, V., and, Suddendorf, T. 2007. Participant loss due to fussiness in infant visual paradigms: A review of the last 20 years. Infant Behavior and Development, 30: 505-514. (Pubitemid 47181260)
30. Snyder, K., Webb, S. J., and, Nelson, C. A. 2002. Theoretical and methodological implications of variability in infant brain response during a recognition memory paradigm. Infant Behavior and Development, 25: 466-494. (Pubitemid 36105321)
31. Snyder, K. A., Garza, J., Zolot, L., and, Kresse, A. 2010. Electrophysiological signals of familiarity and recency in the infant brain. Infancy, 15 (5): 487-516.
32. Stahl, D., Parise, E., Hoehl, S., and, Striano, T. 2010. Eye contact and emotional face processing in 6-month-old infants: Advanced statistical methods applied to event-related potentials. Brain and Development, 32: 305-317.
33. Stahl, D., Pickles, A., Elsabbagh, M., Johnson, M. H., and, The BASIS Team. 2012. Novel machine learning methods for ERP analysis: A validation from research on infants at risk for autism. Developmental Neuropsychology, 37: 274-298.
34. Steichen, T. 1998. sbe19: Tests for publication bias in meta-analysis. Stata Technical Bulletin, 41: 9-15.
35. Sterne, J. A. C., and, Egger, M. 2001. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54 (10): 1046-1055. (Pubitemid 32888370)
36. Sterne, J. A. C., Egger, M., and, Smith, G. D. 2001. Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ, 323: 101-105. (Pubitemid 32681979)
37. Stets, M., and, Reid, V. M. 2011. Infant ERP amplitudes change over the course of an experimental session: Implications for cognitive processes and methodology. Brain and Development, 33 (7): 558-568.
38. Thompson, S. G., and, Sharp, S. J. 1999. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: A comparison of methods. Statistics in Medicine, 18 (20): 2693-2708. (Pubitemid 29481404)
39. Tobias, A. 1999. Assessing the influence of a single study in the meat-analysis estimate. Stata Technical Bulletin, 47: 15-17.