Osteoporosis-related fracture case definitions for population-based administrative data

BMC Public Health

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Lix, Lisa M ^a,b   Azimaee, Mahmoud ^c   Osman, Beliz Acan ^d   Caetano, Patricia ^b   Morin, Suzanne ^e   Metge, Colleen ^b   Goltzman, David ^e   Kreiger, Nancy ^f   Prior, Jerilynn ^g   Leslie, William D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^d Health Quality Council   (Canada)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CASE REPORT; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; NOMENCLATURE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MANITOBA; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84862096443     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-301     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Estimation of the prevalence of low bone density in Canadian women and men using a population-specific DXA reference standard: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Kreiger N, Poliquin S, Murray TM, Blondeau L, Berger C, Hanley DA, Prior JC, Osteoporos Int 2000 11 897 904 (Pubitemid 32049481)
2. Fracture incidence in Olmsted County, Minnesota: comparison of urban with rural rates and changes in urban rates over time. Melton LJ, O'Fallon WM, Crowson CS, Osteoporos Int 1999 9 29 37 (Pubitemid 29086162)
3. Incidence of hip fracture in Saskatchewan, Canada, 19761985. Ray WA, Griffin MR, West R, Strand L, Melton LJ, Am J Epidemiol 1990 131 502 509 (Pubitemid 20051745)
4. The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, De Laet C, Jonsson B, Osteoporos Int 2004 15 20 26 (Pubitemid 38252435)
5. Developments of the incidence of osteoporosis in The Netherlands: a PHARMO study. Goettsch WG, de Jong RB, Kramarz P, Herings RM, Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007 16 166 172 (Pubitemid 46291168)
6. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB, JAMA 2009 302 1573 1579
7. Number of osteoporotic sites and fracture risk assessment: a cohort study from the Manitoba Bone Density Program. Leslie WD, Tsang JF, Caetano PA, Lix LM, J Bone Miner Res 2007 22 476 483 (Pubitemid 46797131)
8. Risk factors for hip fracture in skilled nursing facilities: who should be evaluated? Colon-Emeric CS, Biggs DP, Schenck AP, Lyles KW, Osteoporos Int 2003 14 484 489 (Pubitemid 36919208)
9. Tamoxifen use and osteoporotic fracture risk: a population-based analysis. Cooke AL, Metge C, Lix L, Prior HJ, Leslie WD, J Clin Oncol 2008 26 5227 5232
10. Lithium use and the risk of fractures. Wilting I, de Vries F, Thio BM, Cooper C, Heerdink ER, Leufkens HG, Nolen WA, Egberts AC, van Staa TP, Bone 2007 40 1252 1258 (Pubitemid 46550974)
11. Fracture risk from psychotropic medications: a population-based analysis. Bolton JM, Metge C, Lix L, Prior H, Sareen J, Leslie WD, J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008 28 384 391
12. Utilization of routinely collected administrative data in monitoring the incidence of aging dependent hip fracture. Sund R, Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2007 4 2
13. Validation of diagnostic codes for subtrochanteric, diaphyseal, and atypical femoral fractures using administrative claims data. Narongroeknawin P, Patkar NM, Shakoory B, Jain A, Curtis JR, Delzell E, Lander PH, Lopez-Ben RR, Pitt MJ, Safford MM, et al. J Clin Densitom 2012 15 92 102
14. Identification and validation of vertebral compression fractures using administrative claims data. Curtis JR, Mudano AS, Solomon DH, Xi J, Melton ME, Saag KG, Med Care 2009 47 69 72
15. Algorithms can be used to identify fragility fracture cases in physician-claims databases. Jean S, Candas B, Belzile E, Morin S, Bessette L, Dodin S, Brown JP, Osteoporos Int 2012 23 483 501
16. Identifying wrist fracture patients with high accuracy by automatic categorization of X-ray reports. de Bruijn B, Cranney A, O'Donnell S, Martin JD, Forster AJ, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006 13 696 698 (Pubitemid 44648756)
17. Accuracy of medical records in hip fracture. Fox KM, Reuland M, Hawkes WG, Hebel JR, Hudson J, Zimmerman SI, Kenzora J, Magaziner J, J Am Geriatr Soc 1998 46 745 750 (Pubitemid 28262351)
18. The burden of osteoporosis in California, 1998. Max W, Sinnot P, Kao C, Sung HY, Rice DP, Osteoporos Int 2002 13 493 500 (Pubitemid 34742209)
19. An analysis of osteoporosis-related hip fractures using Hospital Discharge Data. Rubin BR, Rene AA, Mains DA, Marshall MA, J Am Osteopath Assoc 2003 103 169 175 (Pubitemid 36506269)
20. Family physician workloads and access to care in Winnipeg, 1991 to 2001. Watson D, Katz A, Reid RJ, Bogdanovic B, Roos NP, Heppner P, Can Med Assoc J 2004 171 339 342 (Pubitemid 39127986)
21. Diagnosing asthma: the fit between survey and administrative database. Huzel L, Roos LL, Anthonisen NR, Manfreda J, Can Respir J 2002 9 407 412 (Pubitemid 36204208)
22. Estimating the burden of disease. Comparing administrative data and self-reports. Robinson JR, Young TK, Roos LL, Gelskey DE, Med Care 1997 35 932 947 (Pubitemid 127453475)
23. Estimated burden of diabetes-mellitus in Manitoba according to health-insurance claims: a pilot study. Young TK, Roos NP, Hammerstrand KM, Can Med Assoc J 1991 144 318 324
24. Diabetes in Ontario: determination of prevalence and incidence using a validated administrative data algorithm. Hux JE, Ivis F, Flintoft V, Bica A, Diabetes Care 2002 25 512 516 (Pubitemid 41103345)
25. Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. Leslie WD, O'Donnell S, Jean S, Lagace C, Walsh P, Bancej C, Morin S, Hanley DA, Papaioannou A, JAMA 2009 302 883 889
26. The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos): background, rationale, methods. Kreiger N, Tenenhouse A, Joseph L, Mackenzie T, Poliquin S, Brown JP, Prior JC, Rittmaster RS, Can J Aging 1999 18 376 387
27. Risk factors associated with incident clinical vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos). Papaioannou A, Joseph L, Ioannidis G, Berger C, Anastassiades T, Brown JP, Hanley DA, Hopman W, Josse RG, Kirkland S, et al. Osteoporos Int 2005 16 568 578
28. Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, khtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L, Kennedy CC, Prior JC, Olszynski WP, Davison KS, et al. Can Med Assoc J 2009 181 265 271
29. Multiple imputation to account for missing data in a survey: estimating the prevalence of osteoporosis. Kmetic A, Joseph L, Berger C, Tenenhouse A, Epidemiology 2002 13 437 444 (Pubitemid 34627843)
30. Linking the Iowa Women's Health Study cohort to Medicare data: linkage results and application to hip fracture. Virnig B, Durham SB, Folsom AR, Cerhan J, Am J Epidemiol 2010 172 327 333
31. Validation of a case definition for osteoporosis disease surveillance. Leslie WD, Lix LM, Yogendran MS, Osteoporos Int 2010 22 37 46
32. Population-based data sources for chronic disease surveillance. Lix LM, Yogendran M, Shaw SY, Burchill C, Metge C, Bond R, Chron Dis Can 2008 29 31 38
33. Using multiple data features improved the validity of osteoporosis case ascertainment from administrative data. Lix LM, Yogendran M, Leslie WD, Shaw SY, Baumgartner R, Bowman C, Metge C, Gumel A, James RC, Hux JF, J Clin Epidemiol 2008 61 1250 1260
34. Secular trends in proximal femoral fracture, Oxford record linkage study area and England 196886. Evans JG, Seagroatt V, Goldacre MJ, J Epidemiol Community Health 1997 51 424 429 (Pubitemid 27399533)
35. Internal validation of Medicare claims data. Baron JA, Lu-Yao G, Barrett J, McLerran D, Fisher ES, Epidemiology 1994 5 541 544 (Pubitemid 24271624)
36. "Pathologic" fractures: should these be included in epidemiologic studies of osteoporotic fractures? Curtis JR, Taylor AJ, Matthews RS, Ray MN, Becker DJ, Gary LC, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA, Saag KG, Warriner A, et al. Osteoporos Int 2009 20 1969 1972
37. Hip fracture. Zuckerman JD, N Engl J Med 1996 334 1519 1525 (Pubitemid 26166896)
38. McCulloch CE, Searle SR, Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models Wiley, New York 2001
39. Hedeker D, Gibbons RD: Longitudinal Data Analysis Wiley, Hoboken, NJ 2006
40. Identification of fractures from computerized Medicare files. Ray WA, Griffin MR, Fought RL, Adams ML, J Clin Epidemiol 1992 45 703 714
41. Hip fracture and its consequences: differences between men and women. Orwig DL, Chan J, Magaziner J, Orthop Clin North Am 2006 37 611 622 (Pubitemid 44820262)
42. The abuse of power: the pervasive fallacy of power calculations for data analysis. Hoenig JM, Heisey DM, Am Stat 2001 55 19 24
43. Population-based Canadian hip fracture rates with international comparisons. Leslie WD, O'Donnell S, Lagace C, Walsh P, Bancej C, Jean S, Siminoski K, Kaiser S, Kendler DL, Jaglal S, Osteoporos Int 2010 21 1317 1322
44. Incidence of and predictors of false negative self-reports of hip fracture in cohort studies: the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF). Virnig B, Taylor BC, Ensrud KE, Paudel M, Durham S, Schousboe JT, J Bone Miner Res 2012 26 Suppl 1 Available at [www.jbmr.org]. Accessed [April 7, 2012]