Determination of patient concerns in choosing surgery and preference for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and assessment of satisfaction with postoperative cosmesis

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 585-591

  Lucas, Steven M ^a   Baber, Jacob ^a   Sundaram, Chandru P ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SINGLE SITE SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; PAIN; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCAR; SEX;

CICATRIX; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84861994694     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0181     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: A 9-year experience. J Urol 2000;164:1153-1159.
2. Kercher KW, Heniford BT, Matthews BD, et al. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in 210 consecutive patients: Outcomes, cost, and changes in practice patterns. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1889-1895. (Pubitemid 38049897)
3. Nicholson ML, Kaushik M, Lewis GR, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 2010;97:21-28.
4. Bansal P, Gupta A, Mongha R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: Comparison of two surgical approaches - a single centre experience of three years. J Minim Access Surg 2008;4:76-79.
5. Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel MB, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers. J Endourol 2010; 24:2003-2015.
6. Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, et al. Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology 2007;70:1039-1042. (Pubitemid 350297407)
7. Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, et al. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: Matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 2010;57:95-101.
8. Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina R, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: Initial hundred patients. Urology 2009;74:805-812.
9. Irwin BH, Cadeddu JA, Tracy CR, et al. Complications and conversions of upper tract urological laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (less): Multicentre experience: results from the NOTES Working Group. BJU Int 2010;Sept 14. Epub ahead of print.
10. Tugcu V, Ilbey YO, Mutlu B, Tasci AI. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: A prospective randomized study. J Endourol 2010;24:1315-1320.
11. Tracy CR, Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA. Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology 2009;74:1029-1034.
12. Rabenalt R, Arsov C, Giessing M, et al. Extraperitoneal laparo-endoscopic single-site radical prostatectomy: First experience. World J Urol 2010;28:705-708.
13. Santos BF, Enter D, Soper NJ, Hungness ES. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: A comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc 2011;25:483-490.
14. Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, et al. Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Surg Endosc 1998;12:1334-1340. (Pubitemid 128531257)
15. Lind MY, Hop WC, Weimar W, IJeermans JN. Body image after laparoscopic or open donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1276-1279. (Pubitemid 39014872)
16. Sucullu I, Filiz AI, Canda AE, et al. Body image and cosmesis after laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009;19:401-404.
17. Canda AE, Sucullu I, Ozsoy Y, et al. Hospital experience, body image, and cosmesis after laparoscopic or open splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009;19:479-483.
18. Haber GP, White MA, Autorino R, et al. Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology 2010;76:1279-1282.
19. Rao A, Kynaston J, Macdonald ER, Ajmed I. Patient preferences for surgical techniques: Should we invest in new approaches? Surg Endosc 2010;24:3016-3025.
20. Peterson CY, Ramamoorthy S, Andrews B, et al. Women's positive perception of transvaginal NOTES surgery. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1770-1774.
21. Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ. Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1519-1525.