Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 21-28

  Nicholson, M L ^a   Kaushik, M ^a   Lewis, G R R ^a   Brook, N R ^a   Bagul, A ^a   Kay, M D ^a   Harper, S J ^a   Elwell, R ^a   Veitch, P S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATRACURIUM; BUPIVACAINE; FENTANYL; HEPARIN; ISOFLURANE; MORPHINE; PARACETAMOL; PROPOFOL; TRAMADOL;

ADULT; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONOR; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; NEPHRECTOMY; OPEN DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION; SAFETY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THROMBOSIS; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM;

ANALGESICS, OPIOID; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORPHINE; NEPHRECTOMY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING;

EID: 72949107344     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6803     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1995; 50: 1047-1049.
2. Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ, Farney AC, Lim JW, Johnson LB et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 1999; 68: 497-502.
3. Flower JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, Evans D et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 483-490.
4. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M, Hiller J,Weber R, Schulam PG et al. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy - a comparison with the open approach. Transplantation 1997; 63: 229-233.
5. Lewis GR, Brook NR,Waller JR, Bains JC, Veitch PS, Nicholson ML. A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int 2004; 17: 589-595.
6. Buell JF, Lee L, Martin JE, Dake NA, Cavanaugh TM, Hanaway MJ et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs. open live donor nephrectomy: a quality of life and functional study. Clin Transplant 2005; 19: 102-109.
7. Reeder MK, Goldman MD, Loh L, Muir AD, Casey KR, Lehane JR. Late postoperative nocturnal dips in oxygen saturation in patients undergoing major abdominal vascular surgery. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 110-115.
8. Merlin TL, Scott DF, Rao MM,Wall DR, Francis DMA, Bridgewater FHG et al. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a systematic review. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1659-1666.
9. Chang DT, Kirsch AJ, Sawczuk IS. Oliguria during laparoscopic surgery. J Endourol 1994; 8: 349-352.
10. Nadu A, Ekstein P, Szold A, Friedman A, Nakache R, Cohen Y et al. Ventilatory and haemodynamic changes during retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: a prospective real-time comparison. J Urol 2005; 174: 1013-1017.
11. Reeder MK, Muir AD, Foëx P, Goldman MD, Loh L, Smart D. Postoperative myocardial ischaemia: temporal association with nocturnal hypoxaemia. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67: 626-631.
12. Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, Smythe A, Reed MW, Stoddard CJ et al. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 1996; 347: 989-994.
13. Wolf JS Jr, Merion RM, Leichtman AB, Campbell DA Jr, Magee JC, Punch JD et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 72: 284-290.
14. Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A, Shakhssalim N, Hosseini Moghaddam SM. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int 2005; 95: 851-855.
15. Øyen O, Andersen M, Mathisen L, Kvarstein G, Edwin B, Line PD et al. Laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1236-1240.
16. Kok NF, LindMY, Hansson BM, Pilzecker D, Mertens zur Bord IR, Knipscheer BC et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and mini incision open donor nephrectomy: single blind, randomised controlled clinical trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 221-231.
17. Ponsky L, Cherullo E, Moinzadeh A, Desai M, Kaouk J, Haber GP et al. The Hem-o-Lok clip is safe for laparoscopic nephrectomy: a multi-institutional review. Urology 2007; 71: 593-596.
18. Wadström J. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: experience from the first 75 consecutive cases. Transplantation 2005; 80: 1060-1066.
19. Yang SL, Harkaway R, Badosa F, Ginsberg P, Greenstein MA. Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy: improvement in patient outcome. Urology 2002; 59: 673-677.
20. Kok NF, Alwayn IP, LindMY,TranKT, Weimar W, IJzermans JN. Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy. Transplantation 2006; 81: 881-887.