Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: A matched-pair analysis

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 625-629

  Akman, Tolga ^a   Binbay, Murat ^a   Ugurlu, Mesut ^a   Kaba, Mehmet ^a   Akcay, Muzaffer ^a   Yazici, Ozgur ^a   Ozgor, Faruk ^a   Muslumanoglu, Ahmet Yaser ^a  

^a HASEKI EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM OXALATE;

AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FEMALE; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; KIDNEY COLIC; KIDNEY SURGERY; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY CALCULI; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861970726     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0526     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, et al. Chapter 1: AUA Guideline on management of staghorn calculi: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2005;173:1991- 2000.
2. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. Guidelines on Urolithiasis. 2010:1-106. Available at: www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/ Urolithiasis%202010.pdf. Accessed: January 20, 2012.
3. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:899-906. (Pubitemid 46281422)
4. de la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: Indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 2011;25:11-17.
5. Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli AH, Karadag MA, et al. Impact of percutaenous access point number and location on complication and success rates in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int 2006;77:340-346. (Pubitemid 44837004)
6. Binbay M, Yuruk E, Akman T, et al. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? J Endourol 2010;24:1929-1934.
7. Skolarikos A, de la Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol 2008;18:229-234. (Pubitemid 351317397)
8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213. (Pubitemid 38963009)
9. Paffen ML, Keizer JG, de Winter GV, et al. A comparison of the physical properties of four new generation flexible ureteroscopes: (De)flection, flow properties, torsion stiffness, and optical characteristics. J Endourol 2008;22:2227-2234.
10. Yinghao S, Yang B, Gao X. The management of renal caliceal calculi with a newly designed ureteroscope: A rigid ureteroscope with a deflectable tip. J Endourol 2010;24:23- 26.
11. Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol 2009;23:1395-1398.
12. Hyams ES,Munver R, BirdVG, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: A multi-institutional experience. J Endourol 2010;24:1583-1588.
13. Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater - is this the new frontier? J Urol 2008;179: 98-984.
14. Tonner PH, Kampen J, Scholz J. Pathophysiological changes in the elderly. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2003;17: 163-177. (Pubitemid 38937089)
15. Chung BI, Aron M, Hegarty NJ, Desai MM. Ureteroscopic versus percutaneous treatment for medium-size (1-2-cm) renal calculi. J Endourol 2008;22:343-346. (Pubitemid 351301329)
16. Hyams ES, Shah O. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: Cost and outcome analysis. J Urol 2009;182:1012-1017.
17. Bozkurt OF, Resorlu B, Yildiz Y, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20mm. J Endourol 2011;25:1131-1135.
18. Akman T, Binbay M, Sari E, et al. Factors affecting bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Single surgeon experience. J Endourol 2011;25:327-333.
19. Rana AM, Zaidi Z, El-Khalid S. Single-center review of fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrostomy performed by urologic surgeons. J Endourol 2007;21:688-691. (Pubitemid 47311406)
20. Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. Eur Urol 2009;55:1190-1196.
21. Mariani AJ. Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi. J Urol 2007;177:168-173. (Pubitemid 44879470)
22. Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A, et al. The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: Classification of complications. J Endourol 2011;25:1275-1280.
23. Akman T, Binbay M, Yuruk E, et al. Tubeless procedure is most important factor in reducing length of hospitalization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Results of univariable and multivariable models. Urology 2011;77:299-304.