A randomized controlled trial comparing patellar retention versus patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty: 5-10 year follow-up

BMC Research Notes

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Beaupre, Lauren ^a   Secretan, Charles ^b   Johnston, Dwc ^b   Lavoie, Guy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Patellar Resurfacing; Patient Reported Outcomes; Recovery; Revision; Total Knee Arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATELLA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; STATISTICS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATELLA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REOPERATION;

EID: 84861889686     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17560500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-273     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Resurfacing versus nonresurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: a critical appraisal of the available evidence. Calvisi V, Camillieri G, Lupparelli S, Arch Orthop Traum Surg 2009 129 9 1261 1270 10.1007/s00402-008- 0801-9
2. The consequences of not resurfacing the patella. Bourne RB, Burnett RS, Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004 428 166 169 15534538 (Pubitemid 39506169)
3. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Forster MC, Knee 2004 11 6 427 430 10.1016/j.knee.2004.03.006 15609463 (Pubitemid 39586642)
4. Systematic review of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Li S, Chen Y, Su W, Zhao J, He S, Luo X, Int Orthop 2011 35 3 305 316 10.1007/s00264-010-1109-2 20803354
5. A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, Ravaud P, Bizot P, Hannouche D, et al. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2005 432 196 203 Mar 2005;(432):196-203 (Pubitemid 40316181)
6. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. Pakos EE, Ntzani EE, Trikalinos TA, J Bone Joint Surg Volume 2005 87 A(7) 1438 1445 (Pubitemid 40917742)
7. Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery. Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Saleh KJ, Kuskowski MA, Sharkey PF, Mont MA, Clin Orthop Rel Res 2005 438 191 196 (Pubitemid 41254336)
8. A prospective randomized clinical trial of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in bilateral TKA. Burnett RS, Boone JL, McCarthy KP, Rosenzweig S, Barrack RL, Clin Orthop Rel Res 2007 464 65 72 (Pubitemid 350064215)
9. Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: a ten-year randomised prospective trial. Campbell DG, Duncan WW, Ashworth M, Mintz A, Stirling J, Wakefield L, et al. J Bone Joint Surg 2006 88-B 6) 734 739 (Pubitemid 43971137)
10. Total knee replacement with and without patellar resurfacing: a prospective, randomised trial using the profix total knee system. Smith AJ, Wood DJ, Li MG, J Bone Joint Surg 2008 90-B 1) 43 49 (Pubitemid 351184790)
11. The effects of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty on position sense: a prospective randomized study. Waikakul S, Vanadurongwan V, Bintachitt P, J Med Assoc Thailand 2000 83 9 975 982
12. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. Waters TS, Bentley G, J Bone Joint Surg 2003 85-A 2) 212 217 12571296 (Pubitemid 36538781)
13. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, White B, Brankov B, Bulsara MK, J Bone Joint Surg 2002 84-A 2) 187 193 11861723
14. Does patella resurfacing really matter? Pain and function in 972 patients after primary total knee arthroplasty. Lygre SH, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Vollset SE, Furnes O, Acta Orthop 2010 81 1 99 107 10.3109/17453671003587069 20158405
15. Patella resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial at a minimum of 10 years' followup. Burnett RS, Haydon CM, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, Clin Orthop Rel Res 2004 428 12 25 Nov 2004;(428):12-25 (Pubitemid 39506146)
16. Outcomes of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a 9-year experience based on a case series of scorpio PS knees. Epinette JA, Manley MT, J Knee Surg 2008 21 4 293 298 10.1055/s-0030-1247835 18979932
17. Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: 8- to 10-year results. Mayman D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer J, J Arthroplasty 2003 18 5 541 545 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00150-5 12934203 (Pubitemid 37040346)
18. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I, Osteoarthrit Cartil 2007 15 3 273 280 10.1016/j.joca.2006.09.001
19. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME, J Rheumatol 2000 27 7 1745 1752 10914862 (Pubitemid 30462822)
20. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Kinemax Outcomes Group, J Bone Joint Surg 2001 83-A 12 1864 1865
21. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW, J Rheumatol 1988 15 12 1833 1840 3068365 (Pubitemid 19037656)
22. Pain assessment in osteoarthritis: experience with the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Bellamy N, Sem Arthrit Rheum 1989 18 4:Suppl 2) uppl-7
23. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J, Green R, Hawker G, Wright J, et al. Med Care 1995 33 4 Suppl) S131 AS144 7723441
24. Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G, Arthrit Rheum 2001 45 4 384 391 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4<384::AID- ART352>3.0.CO;2-0 (Pubitemid 32738745)
25. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM, Health Econ 1993 2 3) 217 227 8275167
26. Should the patella be resurfaced in primary total knee arthroplasty? An evidence-based analysis. Meneghini RM, J Arthroplasty 2008 23 7:Suppl uppl-4
27. Predicting the course of functional limitation among older adults with knee pain: do local signs, symptoms and radiographs add anything to general indicators? Thomas E, Peat G, Mallen C, Wood L, Lacey R, Duncan R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2008 67 10 1390 1398 10.1136/ard.2007.080945 18245111