Patellar resurfacing in total knee replacement: A ten-year randomised prospective trial

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 734-739

  Campbell, D G ^a,b   Duncan, W W ^a   Ashworth, M ^a   Mintz, A ^a   Stirling, J ^a   Wakefield, L ^a   Stevenson, T M ^a  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b Wakefield Orthopaedic Clinic   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; POLYETHYLENE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROSCOPIC SURGERY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMENTIA; DETERIORATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATELLA; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33745673107     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.16822     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ranawat CS. The patellofemoral joint in total condylar knee arthroplasty: pros and cons based on five-to ten-year follow up observations. Clin Orthop 1986;205:93-9.
2. Insall J, Tria AJ, Scott WN. The total condylar knee prosthesis: the first 5 years. Clin Orthop 1979;145:68-77.
3. Freeman MA, Samuelson KM, Elias SG, et al. The patellofemoral joint in total knee prostheses: design considerations. J Arthroplasty 1989;4(Suppl):69-74.
4. Barrack RL, Wolfe MW. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;8:75-82.
5. Harwin SF, Stein AJ, Stern RE. Patellofemoral resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. Contemp Orthop 1994;29:265-71.
6. Feller JA, Bartlett RJ, Lang DM. Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1996;78-B:226-8.
7. Pollo FE, Jackson RW, Koeter S, et al. Walking, chair rising, and stair climbing after total knee arthroplasty: patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing. Am J Knee Surg 2000;13:103-8.
8. Levitsky KA, Harris WJ, McManus J, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing: clinical outcomes and long-term follow up evaluation. Clin Orthop 1993;286:116-21.
9. Picetti GD 3rd, McGann WA, Welch RB. The patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990;72-A:1379-82.
10. Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Lloyd DG. Clinical outcomes and walking analysis after total knee arthroplasty with and without patella resurfacing: a prospective randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B(Suppl III):338.
11. Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:187-93.
12. Waters TS, Bentley G. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:212-17.
13. Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, et al. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001;83-A:1376-81.
14. Mayman D, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vas M, Kramer J. Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella in total knee arthroplasty: 8- to 10-year results. J Arthroplasty 2003;18:541-45.
15. Schroeder-Boersch H, Scheller G, Fischer J, Jani L. Advantages of patella resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: two-year results of a prospective randomized study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;117:73-8.
16. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA, Karachalios T. Should the patella be resurfaced during total knee replacement? Knee 2000;7:17-23.
17. Muoneke HE, Khan AM, Giannikas KA, Hagglund E, Dunningham TH. Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:675-8.
18. Campbell DG, Mintz AD, Stevenson TM. Early patellofemoral revision following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995;10:287-91.
19. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA, 2004.
20. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-14.
21. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1961;43-B:752-7.
22. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatology 1988;15:1833-40.
23. Figgie HE 3rd, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS 3rd, Gordon NH. The influence of tibial-patella femoral location on the function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986;68-A: 1035-40.
24. Insall JN, Salvati E. Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology l971;101:101-4.
25. Gomes LS, Bechtold JE, Gustilo RB. Patella prosthesis positioning in total knee arthroplasty: a roentgenographic study. Clin Orthop 1988;236:72-81.
26. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:9-12.
27. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:262-7.
28. Boyd AD Jr, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB. Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1993;75-A:674-81.
29. Berry DJ, Rand JA. Isolated patellar component revision of total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1993;286:110-15.