Particle Flow Analysis: Exploring Potential Use Phase Emissions of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles from Sunscreen, Paint, and Cement

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 343-351

  Arvidsson, Rickard ^a   Molander, Sverker ^a   Sandén, Björn A ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Explorative scenarios; Industrial ecology; Material flow analysis (MFA); Nanomaterials; Nanotechnology; Substance flow analysis (SFA)

Indexed keywords

EXPLORATIVE SCENARIOS; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; MATERIAL FLOW ANALYSIS; PARTICLE FLOW; PARTICLE NUMBERS; POTENTIAL RISKS; POTENTIAL TECHNOLOGIES; SUBSTANCE FLOW ANALYSIS; TIO; TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLES; USE PHASE;

CEMENTS; NANOPARTICLES; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OXIDES; PAINT; SUN HOODS;

TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

CEMENT; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; EMISSION; FUTURE PROSPECT; INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; MATERIAL FLOW ANALYSIS; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RISK FACTOR; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; TITANIUM;

EID: 84861835833     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00429.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Allenby, B. and D. Rejeski 2009. The industrial ecology of emerging technologies: Complexity and the reconstruction of the world. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13(2): 168-183.
2. Arvidsson, R., S. Molander, and B. A. Sandén 2011a. Impacts of a silver-coated future: Particle flow analysis of silver nanoparticles. Journal of Industrial Ecology DOI:
3. Arvidsson, R., S. Molander, B. A. Sandén, and M. Hassellöv 2011b. Challenges in exposure modeling of nanoparticles in aquatic environments. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 17(1): 245-262.
4. Baun, A., N. Hartmann, K. Grieger, and K. Kusk 2008. Ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to aquatic invertebrates: A brief review and recommendations for future toxicity testing. Ecotoxicology 17(5): 387-395.
5. Börjeson, L., M. Höjer, K.-H. Dreborg, T. Ekvall, and G. Finnveden 2006. Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide. Futures 38(7): 723-739.
6. Boxall, A., Q. Chaudhry, C. Sinclair, A. Jones, R. Aitken, B. Jefferson, and C. Watts 2007. Current and future predicted environmental exposure to engineered nanoparticles. York, UK : Central Science Laboratory.
7. British Standards Institution. 2007. Terminology for nanomaterials. London : PAS (Publicly Available Specification).
8. Burgman, M. A. 2005. Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
9. Cassar, L., C. Pepe, G. Tognon, G. L. Guerrini, and R. Amadelli 2003. White cement for architectural concrete, possessing photocatalytic properties. In Proceedings of the 11th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement. Skokie, IL, USA : Portland Cement Association.
10. Chertow, M. 2000. The IPAT equation and its variants. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(4): 13-29.
11. Christian, P., F. von der Kammer, M. Baalousha, and T. Hofmann 2008. Nanoparticles: Structure, properties, preparation and behaviour in environmental media. Ecotoxicology 17(5): 326-343.
12. Colvin, V. L. 2003. The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials. Nature Biotechnology 21(10): 1166-1170.
13. González, S., M. Fernández-Lorente, and Y. Gilaberte-Calzada 2008. The latest on skin photoprotection. Clinics in Dermatology 26(6): 614-626.
14. Gottschalk, F., R. W. Scholz, and B. Nowack 2010a. Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: Methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles. Environmental Modelling & Software 25(3): 320-332.
15. Gottschalk, F., T. Sonderer, R. W. Scholz, and B. Nowack 2009. Modeled environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials (TiO2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. Environmental Science & Technology 43(24): 9216-9222.
16. Gottschalk, F., T. Sonderer, R. W. Scholz, and B. Nowack 2010b. Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 29(5): 1036-1048.
17. Handy, R., F. von der Kammer, J. Lead, M. Hassellöv, R. Owen, and M. Crane 2008. The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17(4): 287-314.
18. Hansen, S. F., B. H. Larsen, S. I. Olsen, and A. Baun 2007. Categorization framework to aid hazard identification of nanomaterials. Nanotoxicology 1(3): 243-250.
19. Hansen, S. F., A. Maynard, A. Baun, and J. A. Tickner 2008. Late lessons from early warnings for nanotechnology. Nature Nanotechnology 3(8): 444-447.
20. Hsu, L.-Y. and H.-M. Chein 2007. Evaluation of nanoparticle emission for TiO2 nanopowder coating materials. In Nanotechnology and occupational health, edited by A. D. Maynard and D. Y. H. Pui Dordrecht, the Netherlands : Springer.
21. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 2006. Titanium dioxide (group 2B). Accessed 9 August 2011.
22. ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2008. Nanotechnologies - Terminology and definitions for nano-objects - Nanoparticle, nanofibre and nanoplate. ISO/TS 27687:2008(E). Geneva, Switzerland : ISO.
23. Jiang, J., G. Oberdörster, and P. Biswas 2009. Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11(1): 77-89.
24. Ju-Nam, Y. and J. R. Lead 2008. Manufactured nanoparticles: An overview of their chemistry, interactions and potential environmental implications. Science of the Total Environment 400(1-3): 396-414.
25. 2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environmental Pollution 156(2): 233-239.
26. Kapur, A., G. Keoleian, A. Kendall, and S. E. Kesler 2008. Dynamic modeling of in-use cement stocks in the United States. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(4): 539-556.
27. Klaine, S. J., P. J. J. Alvarez, G. E. Batley, T. F. Fernandes, R. D. Handy, D. Y. Lyon, S. Mahendra, M. J. McLaughlin, and J. R. Lead 2008. Nanomaterials in the environment: Behaviour, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 27(9): 1825-1851.
28. Lubick, N. 2008. Risks of nanotechnology remain uncertain. Environmental Science & Technology 42(6): 1821-1824.
29. MacGarvin, M., B. Lambert, P. Infante, M. Greenberg, D. Gee, J. G. Koppe, J. Keys, J. Farman, D. Ibarreta, S. H. Swan, L.-E. Edqvist, K. B. Pedersen, A. Semb, M. K. von Krauss, P. Harremoës, M. Gilbertson, D. Santillo, P. Johnston, W. J. Langston, J. W. Bridges, O. Bridges, P. van Zwanenberg, and E. Millstone 2001. Late lessons from early warnings: The precautionary principle 1896-2000. Copenhagen : European Environment Agency.
30. Maggos, T., A. Plassais, J. Bartzis, C. Vasilakos, N. Moussiopoulos, and L. Bonafous 2008. Photocatalytic degradation of NOx in a pilot street canyon configuration using TiO2-mortar panels. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 136(1): 35-44.
31. Månsson, N., B. Bergbäck, D. Hjortenkrans, A. Jamtrot, and L. Sorme 2009. Utility of substance stock and flow studies. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13(5): 674-686.
32. McWilliams, A. 2008. Nanotechnology: A realistic market assessment. Wellesley, MA, USA : BCC Research.
33. Mueller, N. C. and B. Nowack 2008. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environmental Science & Technology 42(12): 4447-4453.
34. Nel, A., T. Xia, L. Madler, and N. Li 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311(5761): 622-627.
35. Nilsson, Å. 2009. Personal communication with A. Nilsson, Project leader for research and development, Cementa AB, Stockholm, Sweden, 21 April 2009.
36. Nohynek, G. J., J. Lademann, C. Ribaud, and M. S. Roberts 2007. Grey goo on the skin? Nanotechnology, cosmetic and sunscreen safety. Critical Reviews in Toxicology 37(3): 251-277.
37. Oberdörster, G., E. Oberdörster, and J. Oberdörster 2005. Nanotoxicology: An emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environmental Health Perspectives 113(7): 823-839.
38. Ohno, T., K. Sarukawa, K. Tokieda, and M. Matsumura 2001. Morphology of a TiO2 photocatalyst (Degussa, P-25) consisting of anatase and rutile crystalline phases. Journal of Catalysis 203(1): 82-86.
39. Owen, R. and R. Handy 2007. Viewpoint: Formulating the problems for environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials. Environmental Science & Technology 41(16): 5582-5588.
40. Robichaud, C. O., A. E. Uyar, M. R. Darby, L. G. Zucker, and M. R. Wiesner 2009. Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environmental Science & Technology 43(12): 4227-4233.
41. Royal Society. 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London : The Royal Society.
42. Sandén, B. A. and M. Karlström 2007. Positive and negative feedback in consequential life-cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 15(15): 1469-1481.
43. Serpone, N., D. Dondi, and A. Albini 2007. Inorganic and organic UV filters: Their role and efficacy in sunscreens and suncare product. Inorganica Chimica Acta 360(3): 794-802.
44. Shatkin, J. A. 2008. Informing environmental decision making by combining life cycle assessment and risk analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 12(3): 278-281.
45. Suter, G. W., L. W. Barnthouse, S. M. Bartell, T. Mill, and S. Patersson 1993. Ecological risk assessment. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
46. Swedish Cosmetic Toiletry and Detergent Association. 2009. The Swedish Cosmetic and Hygiene Market 2002-2010. Accessed 10 December 2009.
47. Swedish Paint and Printing Ink Makers Association. 2009. Sales Statistics for Paint in Sweden 2001-2010. Accessed 13 May 2009.
48. Sweet, L. and B. Strohm 2006. Nanotechnology-Life-cycle risk management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 12(3): 528-551.
49. Tiraks, F., T. Frechen, S. Kirsch, J. Leuninger, M. Melan, A. Pfau, F. Richter, B. Schuler, and C.-L. Zhao 2003. Formulation effects on the distribution of pigment particles in paints. Progress in Organic Coatings 48(2-4): 140-152.
50. Tolstoj, N., C. Sjöström, and T. Waller 1984. Bostäder och lokaler från energisynpunkt [Accomodations and locales from an energy aspect]. Gävle, Sweden : Statens Institut för Byggnadsforskning [Swedish Institute for Construction Research].
51. United Nations. 2008. Executive summary. In World population prospects. The 2008 revision. New York : United Nations.
52. U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Washington, DC : U.S. EPA.
53. U.S. Geological Survey. 2009a. Mineral commodity summary - Cement. Reston, VA, USA : U.S. Geological Survey.
54. U.S. Geological Survey. 2009b. Mineral commodity summary - Titanium and titanium dioxide. Reston, VA, USA : U.S. Geological Survey.
55. U.S. Geological Survey. 2009c. Mineral commodity summary - Titanium mineral concentrates. Reston, VA, USA : U.S. Geological Survey.
56. Van der Voet, E. 2002. Substance flow analysis methodology. In A handbook of industrial ecology, edited by R. U. Ayres and L. W. Ayres Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar.
57. Van Leeuwen, C. J. and J. L. M. Hermens 2004. Risk assessment of chemicals: An introduction. Dordrecht, the Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
58. Wiesner, M. R., G. V. Lowry, K. L. Jones, J. M. F. Hochella, R. T. Di Giulio, E. Casman, and E. S. Bernhardt 2009. Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials. Environmental Science & Technology 43(17): 6458-6462.