Positive and negative feedback in consequential life-cycle assessment

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 15, Issue 15, 2007, Pages 1469-1481

  Sandén, Björn A ^a   Karlström, Magnus ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Climate change; Consequential; Experience curve; Fuel cell; Life cycle assessment

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GREENHOUSE GASES; INVESTMENTS; LIFE CYCLE; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; EXPERIENCE CURVES; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA);

STATE FEEDBACK;

EID: 34047259330     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. IPCC. Climate change 2001: synthesis report. A Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Integovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
2. Baumann H. Life cycle assessment and decision making: theories and practices. Technical Environmental Planning. AFR report 183 (1998), Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden
3. Ekvall T. System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment, with implications for wastepaper management. Technical environmental planning. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg; 1999.
4. Ekvall T., and Tillman A.-M. Open-loop recycling; criteria for allocation procedures. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2-3 (1997) 155-162
5. Frischknecht R. Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. In: Udo de Haes H.A., and Wrisberg N. (Eds). Life cycle assessment: state-of-the-art and research priorities. LCA documents vol. 1 (1997), Eco-Informa Press, Bayreuth, Germany
6. Baumann H., and Tillman A.-M. The Hitch Hiker's guide to LCA - an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application (2004), Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden
7. In: Guinee J.B. (Ed). Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
8. Ekvall T. Cleaner production tools: LCA and beyond. Journal of Cleaner Production 10 (2002) 403-406
9. de Haes H.A.U., Heijungs R., Suh S., and Huppes H. Three strategies to overcome the limitations of life-cycle assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 8 3 (2004) 19-32
10. Bengtsson M. Facts and interpretations in environmental assessments of products. Environmental systems analysis. PhD thesis, Göteborg, Chalmers University of Technology, ESA report 2002:8; 2002.
11. Tillman A.-M. Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20 (2000) 113-123
12. Weidema B.P., Ekvall T., Pesonen H.-L., Rebitzer G., Sonnemann G.W., and Spielmann M. Scenarios in life-cycle assessment (2004), Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), Pensacola, FL, USA
13. Jonasson K.M., and Sandén B.A. Time and scale aspects in life cycle assessments of emerging technologies. CPM report: 2004-6 (2004), Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg. Available from:
14. Ekvall T., and Weidema B.P. System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9 3 (2004) 161-171
15. Sandén B.A., and Jonasson K.M. Variety creation, growth and selection dynamics in the early phases of a technological transition: the development of alternative transport fuels in Sweden 1974-2004. ESA report: 2005-13 (2006), Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg. Available from:
16. Freeman C. Critical survey, the economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18 (1994) 463-514
17. In: Bijker W.E., Hughes T.P., and Pinch T.J. (Eds). The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology (1987), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
18. Jacobsson S., and Lauber V. The politics and policy of energy system transformation - explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy 34 3 (2006) 256-276
19. Jacobsson S., Sandén B.A., and Bångens L. Transforming the energy system - the evolution of the German technological system for solar cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 16 1 (2004) 3-30
20. Arthur B.W. Competing technologies: an overview technological change and economic theory. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., and Soete L. (Eds). Technical change and economic theory (1988), Pinter, London
21. Sandén B.A. Technology path assessment. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice 6 (2004) 316-330
22. Sandén B.A., and Azar C. Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets: economy wide versus technology specific approaches. Energy Policy 33 (2005) 1557-1576
23. Delucchi M.A. Emissions of greenhouse gases from the use of transportation fuels and electricity. Main text vol. 1 (1991), Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory [ANL/ESD/TM-22]
24. Brandberg A. The life of fuels: motor fuels from source to end use: an energy and emissions systems study of conventional and future options (1992), Transportforskningsberedningen, Stockholm Ecotraffic AB [distributör]
25. Unnash S. Refinement of selected fuel-cycle emission analyses. Prepared for California Air Resource Board, Research Division. Final report FR-00-101; 2000.
26. Delucchi M. A lifecycle emissions model (LEM): lifecycle emissions from transportation fuels, motor vehicles, transportation modes, electricity use, heating and cooking fuels, and materials. Main report. Publication no. UCD-ITS-RR-03-17-MAIN REPORT. Davis, CA: ITS-Davis; 2003.
27. Wang MQ. Greet 1.5 - transportation fuel-cycle model. Methodology, development, use and results, vol. 1. Appendices of data and results, vol. 2. Report ANL/ESD-39. Center for Transportation Research, Energy System Division. Argonne National Lab, 1999.
28. Hart D, Bauen A. Further assessment of the environmental characteristics of fuel cells and competing technologies. Report ETSU F/02/00153/. By ETSU Energy Technology Support Unit for DTI (Department of Trade and Industry); 1998.
29. GM, LBST, BP, ExxonMobil, and Shell. Well-to-wheel analysis of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of advanced fuel/vehicle systems - a European study. Available at: (2002).
30. Weiss MA, Heywood JB, Drake EM, Schafer A, AuYeung FF. On the road in 2020 - a life-cycle analysis of new automobile technologies. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology - Energy Laboratory. MIT EL 00-003; 2000.
31. Weiss M, Heywood J, Schafer A, Natarajan V. Comparative assessment of fuel cell cars. Report LFEE 2003-001 RP. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2003.
32. Row J, Raynolds M, Legati R, Monk R, Arnold G. Life-cycle value assessment (LCVA) of fuel supply options, for fuel cell vehicles. In: Fuel cell power for transportation 2003 (SP-1741/SP-1741CD), 2003 SAE World Congress, SAE, Detroit, Michigan; 2003.
33. Johansson B., and Åhman M. A comparison of technologies for carbon-neutral passenger transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 7 3 (2002) 175-196
34. Ahlvik P, Brandberg Å. Well-to-wheel efficiency for alternative fuels from natural gas or biomass. Vägverket report 2001:85. Borlänge, Sweden: Vägverket; 2001.
35. Edwards R., Griesemann J.-C., Larivé J.-F., and Mahieu V. Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context, WTW version 1a, WTT version 1. CONCAWE, EUCAR and JRC. Available at: (2003).
36. Fuel Cell Today. Fuel cell market survey: buses. Available at: (2002).
37. Fuel Cell Today. Fuel cell market survey: light duty vehicles. Available at: (2003).
38. DOE. US Department of Energy. Fuel Cell report to Congress (ESECS EE-1973); February 2003.
39. Pehnt M. Life-cycle assessment of fuel cell stacks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 26 (2001) 91-101
40. Ogden J. Developing an infrastructure for hydrogen vehicles: a Southern California case study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 24 8 (1999) 709-730
41. Wang M. Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts. Journal of Power Sources 112 1 (2002) 307-321
42. Pehnt M. Life-cycle analysis of fuel cell system components. In: Vielstich W., Arnold Lamm A., and Gasteiger H.A. (Eds). Handbook of fuel cells - fundamentals, technology and applications (2003), John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. 0-471-49926-9 1293-1317
43. Johannson K, Almfors P. The effect of drive cycles on the performance of a PEM fuel cell system for automotive applications. SAE paper 2001-01-3454; 2001.
44. Karlström M. Local environmental benefits of fuel cell buses-a case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 13 (2005) 679-685
45. Weidema B.P., Frees N., and Nielsen A.M. Marginal production technologies for life cycle inventories. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 4 1 (1999) 48-56
46. Grubb M. Who's afraid of atmospheric stabilisation? Making the link between energy resources and climate change. Energy Policy 29 11 (2001) 837-845
47. IPCC. Climate change 2001 mitigation. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Working Group III (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
48. DOT. Assessment of GHG models for the surface transportation sector. Prepared by Energy and Environmental Analysis Inc and Cambridge Systemics (1999), Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
49. Hecq W, Gilson HB, Favrel V. Overview and analysis of the links between "models of mobility" and "models of pollutant emissions from transport". CESSE-ULB Centre for Economic and Social Studies of the Environment Université libre de Bruxelles; 1997.
50. Button K. Transport economics. 2nd ed. (1993), Edward Elgar, Aldershot
51. Sanne C. Dealing with environmental savings in a dynamical economy - how to stop chasing your tail in the pursuit of sustainability. Energy Policy 28 (2000) 487-495
52. Alfredsson E. Green consumption, energy use and carbon dioxide emission. Thesis, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Spatial Modelling Centre, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; 2002.
53. Argote L., and Epple D. Learning curves in manufacturing. Science 247 (1990) 920-924
54. Tsuchiya H., and Kobayashi O. Mass production cost of PEM fuel cell by learning curve. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 29 10 (2004) 985-990
55. David L, Greene DL, Hopson JL, Li J. Running out of and into oil: analyzing global oil depletion and transition through 2050. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, U.S.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2003.
56. Schafer A. The global demand for motorized mobility. Transportation Research A 32 6 (1998) 455-477
57. 2 constraints-cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector. Energy Policy 31 10 (2003) 961-976
58. Schafer A., and Victor D.G. Global passenger travel: implications for carbon dioxide emissions. Energy 24 8 (1999) 657-679
59. Lipman T. Zero emission vehicle scenario cost analysis using a fuzzy set-based framework. PhD thesis, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis; 1999.
60. Carlson EJ, Thijssen JH, Lasher S, Sriramulu S, Stevens GC. Cost modeling of PEM fuel cell systems for automobiles. SAE paper 2002-0-1930; 2002.
61. Råde I, Andersson BA. Platinum group metal resource constraints for fuel-cell electric vehicles. Department of Physical Resource Theory. PRT report 2001:1. Göteborg: Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University; 2001.
62. Andersson B.A., and Jacobsson S. Monitoring and assessing technology choice: the case of solar cells. Energy Policy 28 14 (2000) 1037-1049
63. Hilborn R.C. Chaos and nonlinear dynamics (1994), Oxford University Press, New York
64. Freeman C. The greening of technology and models of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 53 (1996) 27-39
65. Kemp R., Schot J., and Hoogma R. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 2 (1998) 175-195
66. Hulten P., Karlström M., and Bagge L. Fuel cells in a medium-sized city in the year 2020. Urban transport X: urban transport and the environment in the 21st century (2004), WIT, Southampton
67. Karlström M., Hulten P., and Bagge L. Preliminary assessment of a fuel cell public transport system for a medium-sized city in the year 2020. Urban transport X: urban transport and the environment in the 21st century (2004), WIT, Southampton
68. Elzen B. Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transition policy - an example from the traffic and transport domain. In: Corporate social responsibility & governance for sustainability. 10th international network conference, Göteborg, Sweden; 2002.
69. Howells J. The response of old technology incumbents to technological competition - does the sailing ship effect exist? In: Proceedings of knowledge and economic and social change: new challenges to innovation system studies, Manchester, UK, April 7-9; 2003.
70. Grübler A. Technology and global change (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
71. Freeman C., and Luca F. As time goes by - from the industrial revolutions to the information revolution (2002), Oxford University Press