Inciting protocols

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 45-67

  Dekker, Thijs ^a   Vollebergh, Herman R J ^b,d   de Vries, Frans P ^c   Withagen, Cees A ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AGENCY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^d TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acid rain; International environmental agreements; Inventions; Knowledge transfers; Patents

Indexed keywords

ABATEMENT TECHNOLOGIES; DATA SETS; FOREIGN COUNTRIES; HELSINKI; INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL AGREEMENTS; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; PATENTING DECISION; PATENTS; TRANS-BOUNDARY;

ACID RAIN; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; INDUSTRY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; POLLUTION CONTROL; SULFUR DIOXIDE;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

ACID RAIN; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; DATA SET; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; LONG RANGE TRANSPORT; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; REGULATORY APPROACH;

EID: 84861813426     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: 10960449     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2011.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Acemoglu D. Directed technical change. Review of Economic Studies 2002, 69(4):781-809.
2. Acemoglu D., Linn J. Market size in innovation: theory and evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2004, 119(3):1049-1090.
3. D. Acemoglu, P. Aghion, L. Bursztyn, D. Hemous, The Environment and Directed Technical Change, NBER Working Paper No. 15451, NBER, Cambridge, MA, 2009.
4. Ackerman B., Hassler W. Clean Coal/Dirty Air 1981, Yale University Press, New Haven.
5. Bacchiocchi E., Montobbio F. International knowledge diffusion and home-bias effect: do USPTO and EPO patent citations tell the same story?. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 2010, 112(3):441-470.
6. Barrett S. Environment and Statecraft: The Strategy of Environmental-Treaty Making 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
7. Bertrand M., Duflo E., Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2004, 119(1):249-275.
8. Cameron A.C., Trivedi P.K. Econometric models based on count data. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1986, 1(1):29-53.
9. J. Cofala, S. Syri, Sulfur Emissions, Abatement Technologies and Related Costs for Europe in the RAINS Model Database, IIASA Interim Report IR-98-035, Laxenburg, Austria, 1998.
10. Eaton J., Kortum S. International technology diffusion: theory and measurement. International Economic Review 1999, 40(3):537-570.
11. J. Eaton, S. Kortum, J. Lerner, International patenting and the European patent office: a quantitative assessment, in: OECD, Patents, Innovation, and Economic Performance, Paris, 2004, pp. 27-52.
12. Finus M., Tjotta S. The Oslo agreement on sulfur reduction in Europe: the great leap forward?. Journal of Public Economics 2003, 87:2031-2048.
13. Griffith R., Lee S., Van Reenen J. Is distance dying at last? Falling home bias in fixed effects models of patent citations. Quantitative Economics 2011, 2(2):211-249.
14. Harhoff D., Scherer F., Vopel K. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy 2003, 32(8):1343-1363.
15. Hausman J., Hall B.H., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 1984, 52(4):909-938.
16. Hicks J. The Theory of Wages 1932, Macmillan, London, UK.
17. Imura H. Evaluating Japan's environmental policy performance. Environmental Policy in Japan 2005, 342-359. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. H. Imura, M.A. Schreurs (Eds.).
18. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M. Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy 2002, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Keller W. International technology diffusion. Journal of Economic Literature 2004, 42(3):752-782.
20. Lanjouw J.O., Mody A. Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy 1996, 25(4):549-571.
21. Lanjouw J.O., Schankerman M. Patent quality and research productivity: measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal 2004, 114(495):441-465.
22. Levy M.A. The power of tote-board diplomacy. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection 1993, 75-132. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. P.M. Hass, R.O. Keohane, M.A. Levy (Eds.).
23. Lovely M., Popp D. Trade, technology, and the environment: does access to technology promote environmental regulation?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2011, 61(1):16-35.
24. Y. Matsuno, T. Terao, Y. Ito, K. Ueta, The Impact of the SOx Charge and Related Policy Instruments on Technological Innovation in Japan, OECD Report, Paris, 2010.
25. Murdoch J.C., Sandler T. The voluntary provision of a pure public good: the case of reduced CFC emissions and the Montreal protocol. Journal of Public Economics 1997, 63(3):331-349.
26. Murdoch J.C., Sandler T. Voluntary cutbacks and pretreaty behavior: the Helsinki protocol and sulfur emissions. Public Finance Review 1997, 25(2):139-162.
27. Murdoch J.C., Sandler T., Vijverberg W.P.M. The participation decision versus the level of participation in an environmental treaty: a spatial probit analysis. Journal of Public Economics 2003, 87(2):337-362.
28. OECD, Statistical Compendium, Energy Balances, Ed. 01, CD-ROM, Paris, 2010.
29. Picci L. The internationalization of inventive activity: a gravity model using patent data. Research Policy 2010, 39(8):1070-1081.
30. M. Placet, L.D. Kenkeremath, D.G. Streets, G.E. Dials, D.M. Kern, J.L. Nehring, C.B. Szpunar, Markets for Small-Scale, Advanced Coal-Combustion Technologies: A Screening Analysis of OECD Countries, International Coal and Environmental Studies, Argonne, 1988.
31. Popp D. Induced innovation and energy prices. American Economic Review 2002, 92(1):160-180.
32. Popp D. Pollution control innovations and the Clean Air Act of 1990. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2003, 22(4):641-660.
33. 2 regulation in the U.S., Japan and Germany. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2006, 51(1):46-71.
34. Sliggers J., Kakebeeke W. Clearing the Aira United Nations: 25 Years of the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution 2004, United Nations, New York, Geneva.
35. Sloss L.L. Trends in Emission Standards 2003, IEA Coal Research, London, UK.
36. Vernon J.L. Emission Standards for Coal-Fired Plants: Air Pollutant Control Policies 1988, IEA Coal Research, London, UK.
37. Wooldridge J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross-Section and Panel Data 2002, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.