Procedural and interactional justice: A comparative study of victims in the Netherlands and New South Wales

European Journal of Criminology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 260-275

  Laxminarayan, Malini ^a   Henrichs, Jens ^a   Pemberton, Antony ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

comparative criminal justice; interactional justice; procedural justice; victim rights

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861756144     PISSN: 14773708     EISSN: 17412609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477370812439641     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Anderson RA,Otto AL.Perceptions of fairness in the justice system: A cross-cultural comparison.Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2003;31 (6): 557-563.
2. Bies RJAdvances in Organizational Justice. Greenberg JCropanzano R, ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 2001:89-118.
3. Bies RJ,Moag JSResearch on Negotiation in Organizations. Sheppard B, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1986:43-55.
4. Cohen JStatistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988:.
5. Colquitt JA.On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86:386-400.
6. Elliott I,Thomas SDM,Ogloff JRP.Procedural justice in contacts with the police: Testing a relational model of authority in a mixed methods study.Psychology, Public Policy and Law. 2011;17 (4): 592-610.
7. Ellison L.The protection of vulnerable witnesses in court: An Anglo-Dutch comparison.International Journal of Evidence and Proof. 1999;3:29-43.
8. Ellison LNew York: Oxford University Press; 2001:.
9. Erez E,Bienkowska E.Victim participation in proceedings and satisfaction with justice: The case of Poland.Journal of Criminal Justice. 1993;21:47-60.
10. Gramatikov M,Barendrecht M,Laxminarayan M,Verdonschot J,Klaming L,Van Zeeland CA Handbook for Measuring the Costs and Quality of Access to Justice. Apeldoorn: Maklu; 2010:.
11. Greenberg JJustice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. Cropanzano R, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993:79-103.
12. Groenhuijsen MS,Letschert RMCompilation of International Victim Rights Instruments. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers; 2008:.
13. Groenhuijsen MS,Pemberton A.The EU Framework Decision for Victims of Crime: Does hard law make a difference?.European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice. 2009;17 (1): 43-59.
14. Hough M,Ruuskanen E,Jokinen A.Trust in justice and the procedural justice perspective: Editors' introduction.European Journal of Criminology. 2011;8 (4): 249-253.
15. Leventhal GSSocial Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. Gergen KJGreenberg MSWillis RH, ed. Plenum Press: New York; 1980:27-55.
16. Lind EA.The exercise of information influence in legal advocacy.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1975;5:127-143.
17. Lind EA,Tyler TRThe Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum; 1988:.
18. Lind EA,Kurtz S,Musante L,Walker L,Thibaut JW.Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1980;39 (4): 643-653.
19. McCann LI,Sakheim DK,Abrahamson DJ.Trauma and victimization: A model of psychological adaptation.The Counseling Psychologist. 1988;16 (4): 531-594.
20. Mickey RM,Greenland S.The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.American Journal of Epidemiology. 1989;129 (1): 125-137.
21. Orth U.Secondary victimization of crime victims by criminal proceedings.Social Justice Research. 2002;15 (4): 313-325.
22. Shapland J,Willmore J,Duff PVictims in the Criminal Justice System. Brookfield, VT: Avery Publishing Company; 1985:.
23. Tak PJPThe Dutch Criminal Justice System. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers; 2008:.
24. Thibaut JW,Walker LProcedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1975:.
25. Thibaut JW,Walker L.A theory of procedure.California Law Review. 1978;66:541-566.
26. Tyler TR.The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;57:830-838.
27. Tyler TRWhy People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1990:.
28. Tyler TRWhy People Cooperate: The Role of Social Motivations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2010:.
29. Tyler TR,Bies RJApplied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings. Carroll JS, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1990:77-98.
30. Van Koppen PJ,Penrod SAdversarial vs. Inquisitorial Justice: Psychological Perspectives on Criminal Justice Systems. Koppen PJPenrod SD, ed. New York: Plenum; 2003:.
31. Wemmers JMVictims in the Criminal Justice System. Amsterdam: Kugler; 1996:.
32. Wemmers JMInternational Handbook of Victimology. Shoham SGKnepper PKett M, ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis Group; 2010:27-42.
33. Wemmers JM,Van der Leeden R,Steensma H.What is procedural justice: Criteria used by Dutch victims to assess the fairness of criminal justice procedures.Social Justice Research. 1995;8 (4): 329-350.