Perceptions of fairness in the justice system: A cross-cultural comparison

Social Behavior and Personality

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 557-564

  Anderson, Rebecca A ^b   Otto, Amy L ^a  

^a ALBION COLLEGE   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141815588     PISSN: 03012212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2003.31.6.557     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Chase, O. G. (1997). Legal processes and national culture. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 5, 1-24.
2. Gibson, J. L., & Caldeira, G. A. (1996). The legal cultures of Europe. Law and Society Review, 30, 55-85.
3. Houlden, P., LaTour, S., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1978). Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 1330.
4. LaTour, S., Houlden, P., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1976). Some determinants of preference for modes of conflict resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 20, 319-356.
5. Moreland, R. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1982). Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 395-415.
6. Sheppard, B. H. (1985). Justice is no simple matter: Case for elaborating our model of procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 953-962.
7. Walker, L., LaTour, S., Lind, E. A., & Thibaut, J. (1974). Reactions of participants and observers to modes of adjudication. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 295-310.