Effect of nonrigid registration algorithms on deformation-based morphometry: A comparative study with control and Williams syndrome subjects

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 774-788

  Han, Zhaoying ^a,b   Thornton Wells, Tricia A ^b,c,d   Dykens, Elisabeth M ^b,c   Gore, John C ^a,b   Dawant, Benoit M ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Brain atlas; Deformation based morphometry; Nonrigid registration; Williams syndrome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFORMATION BASED MORPHOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NONRIGID REGISTRATION ALGORITHM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTRATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WILLIAMS BEUREN SYNDROME;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; WILLIAMS SYNDROME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861704967     PISSN: 0730725X     EISSN: 18735894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ashburner J., Hutton C., Frackowiak R., Johnsrude I., Price C., Frinston K. Identifying global anatomical differences: deformation-based morphometry. Hum Brain Mapp 1998, 6:348-357.
2. Chung M.K., Worsley K.J., Paus T., Cherif C., Collins D.L., Giedds J.N., et al. A unified statistical approach to deformation-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2001, 14(3):595-606.
3. Gaser C., Volz H., Kiebel S., Riehemann S., Sauer H. Detecting structural changes in whole brain based on nonlinear deformations - applications to Schizophrenia research. Neuroimage 1999, 10:107-113.
4. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Voxel-based morphometry - the methods. Neuroimage 2000, 11:805-821.
5. West J., Fitzpatrick J., Wang M., Dawant B., Maurer C., Kessler R., et al. Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. J. Comput. Assist Tomogr 1997, 21(4):554-566.
6. Christensen G.E., Geng X., Kuhl J.G., Bruss J., Grabowski T.J., Pirwani I.A., et al. Introduction to the non-rigid image registration evaluation project (NIREP). WBIR, LNCS 2006, 4057:128-135.
7. Crum W.R., Rueckert D., Jenkinson M., Kennedy D., Smith S.M. A framework for detailed objective comparison of non-rigid registration algorithms in neuroimaging. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv: MICCAI 2004, 2004(3216):679-686.
8. Hellier P., Barillot C., Corouge I., Gibaud B., Goualher G.L., Collins D.L., et al. Retrospective evaluation of intersubject brain registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003, 22:1120-1130.
9. Yassa M.A., Stark C.E.L. A quantitative evaluation of cross-participant registration techniques for MRI studies of the medial temporal lobe. Neuroimage 2009, 44:319-327.
10. Ardekani B.A., Guckemus S., Bachman A., Hoptman M.J., Wojtaszek M., Nierenberg J. Quantitative comparison of algorithms for inter-subject registration of 3D volumetric brain MRI scans. J Neurosci Methods 2005, 142:67-76.
11. Klein A., Anderson J., Ardekani B.A., Ashburner J., Avants B., Chiang M., et al. Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 2009, 46:786-802.
12. Yanovsky I., Leow A.D., Lee S., Osher S.J., Thompson P.M. Comparing registration methods for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry. Med Image Anal 2009, 13:679-700.
13. Chiang M., Reiss A.L., Lee A.D., Bellugi U., Galaburda A.M., Korenberg J.R., et al. 3D pattern of brain abnormalities in Williams syndrome visualized using tensor-based morphometry. Neuroimage 2007, 36:1096-1109.
14. Yoon U., Lee J., Kwon J.S., Kim H., Shin Y., Ha Y.H., et al. An MRI study of structural variations in schizophrenia using deformation field morphometry. Psychiatry Res Neuroimag 2006, 146:171-177.
15. Korenberg J.R., Chen X.N., Hirota H., Lai Z., Bellugi U., Burian D., et al. VI. Genome structure and cognitive map of Williams syndrome. J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 12(Suppl 1):89-107.
16. Reiss A.L., Eliez S., Schmitt J.E., Straus E., Lai Z., Jones W., et al. IV. Neuroanatomy of Williams syndrome: a high-resolution MRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 12(Suppl 1):65-73.
17. Bellugi U., Lichtenberger L., Johnes W., Lai Z., George M.S.t. I. The neurocognitive profile of Williams syndrome: a complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses. J Cogn Neurosci 2000, 12(supplement):7-29.
18. Schmitt J.E., Eliez S., Bellugi U., Reiss A.L. Analysis of cerebral shape in William syndrome. Arch Neurol 2001, 58:283-287.
19. Jackowski A.P., Schultz R.T. Foreshortened dorsal extension of the central sulcus in Williams syndrome. Cortex 2005, 41(3):282-290.
20. Galaburda A.M., Schmitt J.E., Atlas S.W., Eliez S., Bellugi U., Reiss A.L. Dorsal forebrain anomaly in Williams syndrome. Arch Neurol 2001, 58:1865-1869.
21. Eckert M.A., Galaburda A.M., Karchemskiy A., Liang A., Thompson P., Dutton R.A., et al. Anomalous sylvian fissure morphology in Williams syndrome. Neuroimage 2006, 33:39-45.
22. Schmitt J.E., Eliez S., Warsofsky I.S., Bellugi U., Reiss A.L. Enlarged cerebellar vermis in Williams syndrome. J Psychiatr Res 2001, 35:225-229.
23. Cohen J.D., Mock J.R., Nichols T., Zadina J., Corey D.M., Lemen L., et al. Morphometry of human insular cortex and insular volume reduction in Williams syndrome. J Psychiatr Res 2010, 44:81-89.
24. Sled J.G., Zijdenbos A.P., et al. A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998, 17(1):87-97.
25. Collins D.L., Neelin P., Peters T.M., Evans A.C. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994, 18(2):192-205.
26. Maes F., Collignon A., Vandermeulen D., Marchal G., Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997, 16:187-198.
27. Studholme C., Hill D.L.G., Hawkes D.J. An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment. Pattern Recogn 1999, 32:71-86.
28. Bhatia K.K., Hajnal J.V., Puri B.K., Edwards A.D., Ruckert D. Consistent groupwise non-rigid registration for atlas construction. IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 2004, 908-911.
29. Kochunov P., Lancaster J., Thompson P., Toga A.W., Brewer P., Hardies J., et al. An optimized individual target brain in the Talairach coordinate system. Neuroimage 2002, 17:922-927.
30. Kovacevic N., Chen J., Sled J.G., Henderson J., Henkelman M. Deformation based representation of groupwise average and variability. MICCAI04, LNCS 2004, 3216:615-622.
31. Guimond A., Meunier J., Thirion J.P. Average brain models: a convergence study. Comput Vis Image Underst 2000, 77:192-210.
32. Rohde G.K., Aldroubi A., Dawant B. The adaptive bases algorithm for intensity-based nonrigid image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003, 22(11):1470-1479.
33. Rueckert D., Sonoda L., Hayes C., Hill D., Leach M., Hawkes D. Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1999, 18:712-721.
34. Anderson J., Smith S., Jenkinson M. FNIRT - FMRIB non-linear image registration tool. Hum Brain Map 2008, 2008 Poster #496.
35. Ashburner J., Friston K.J. Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum Brain Map 1999, 7:254-266.
36. Cardenas V.A., Studholme C., Gazdzinski S., Durazzo T.C., Meyerhoff D.J. Deformation based morphometry of brain changes in alcohol dependence and abstinence. Neuroimage 2007, 34(3):879-887.
37. Davatzikos C., Vailant M., Resnick S.M., Prince J.L., Letovsky S., Rryan R.N. A computerized approach for morphological analysis of the corpus callosum. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996, 20(1):88-97.
38. Wang J., Jiang T., Cao Q., Wang Y. Characterizing anatomic differences in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with the use of deformation-based morphometry. Am J Neuroradiol 2007, 28:543-547.
39. Han Z., Funchs L., Davis N., Cannistraci C.J., Anderson A.W., Gore J.C., et al. Analysis of anatomic variability in children with low mathematical skills. Proc SPIE 2008, 6916:69160S.
40. Worsley K.J., Marrett S., Neelin P., Vandal A.C., Friston K.J., Evans A.C. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum Brain Mapp 1996, 4:58-73.
41. Collins D.L., Holmes C.J., Peters T.M., Evans A.C. Automatic 3-D model-based neuroanatomical segmentation. Hum Brain Mapp 1995, 3:190-208.
42. Thompson P.M., Lee A.D., Duttom R.A., Geaga J.A., Hayashi K.M., Eckert M.A., et al. Abnormal cortical complexity and thickness profiles mapped in Williams syndrome. J Nerurosci 2005, 25(16):4146-4158.
43. Eckert M.A., Tenforde A., Galaburda A.M., Bellugi U., Korenberg J.R., Mills D., et al. To modulate or not to module: differing results in uniquely shaped Williams syndrome brains. Neuroimage 2006, 32:1001-1007.
44. Meyer-Lindenberg A., Kohn P., Mervis C.B., Kippenhan J.S., Olsen R.K., Morris C.A., et al. Neural basis of genetically determined visuospatial construction deficit in Williams syndrome. Neuron 2004, 43(5):623-631.
45. Reiss A.L., Eckert M.A., Rose F.E., Karchemskiy A., Kesler S., Chang M., et al. An experiment of nature: brain anatomy parallels cognition and behavior in Williams syndrome. J Neurosci 2004, 24:5009-5015.
46. Van Essen D.C., Dierker D., Snyder A.Z., Raichle M.E., Reiss A.L., Korenberg J. Symmetry of cortical folding abnormalities in Williams syndrome revealed by surface-based analyses. J Neurosci 2006, 26(20):5470-5483.