Movement patterns, social dynamics, and the evolution of cooperation

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 48-58

  Smaldino, Paul E ^a,b   Schank, Jeffrey C ^b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agent based; Dispersal; Dynamic networks; Game theory; Mobility; Random walks

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DISPERSAL; GAME THEORY; MOBILITY; MOVEMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHENOTYPE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ARTICLE; COOPERATION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY);

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; MOVEMENT;

EID: 84861688843     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aktipis C.A. Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation. J. Theoret. Biol. 2004, 231:249-260.
2. Aktipis C.A. Recognition memory and the evolution of cooperation: how simple strategies succeed in an agent-based world. Adapt. Behav. 2006, 14:239-247.
3. Axelrod R. The Evolution of Cooperation 1984, Basic Books, New York.
4. Axelrod R. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration 1997, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
5. Bartumeus F., da Luz M.G.E., Viswanathan G.M., Catalan J. Animal search strategies: a quantitative random-walk analysis. Ecology 2005, 86:3078-3087.
6. Beer R.D., Quinn R.D., Chiel H.J., Ritzmann R.E. Biologically inspired approaches to robotics. Commun. ACM 1997, 40:30-38.
7. Beltran F.S., Salas L., Quera V. Spatial behavior in groups: an agent-based approach. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 2006, 9:5. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/3/5.html.
8. Berg H.C. Random Walks in Biology 1993, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, (expanded ed.).
9. Bonabeau E. From classical models of morphogenesis to agent-based models of pattern formation. Artif. Life 1997, 3:191-211.
10. Carley K.M. Dynamic network analysis. Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis 2003, 133-145. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. R. Breiger, K. Carley, P. Pattinson (Eds.).
11. Chadefaux T., Helbing D. How wealth accumulation can promote cooperation. PLoS One 2010, 5:e13471.
12. Codling E.A., Plank M.J., Benhamou S. Random walk models in biology. J. R. Soc. Interface 2008, 5:813-834.
13. de Andrade P.R., Monteiro A.M.V., Câmara G., Sandri S. Games on cellular spaces: how mobility affects equilibrium. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 2009, 12:5. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/5.html.
14. de Jager M., Weissin F.J., Herman P.M.J., Nolet B.A., van de Koppel J. Lévy walks evolve through interaction between movement and environmental complexity. Science 2011, 332:1551-1553.
15. Dugatkin L.A., Wilson D.S. Rover: a strategy for exploiting cooperators in a patchy environment. Am. Nat. 1991, 138:687-701.
16. Enquist M., Leimar O. The evolution of cooperation in mobile organisms. Anim. Behav. 1993, 45:747-757.
17. Epstein J.M. Zones of cooperation in demographic prisoner's dilemma. Complexity 1998, 4:36-48.
18. Epstein J.M. Modeling civil violence: an agent-based computational approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:7243-7250.
19. Goodnight C., Rauch E., Sayama H., de Aguiar M.A.M., Baranger M., Bar-Yam Y. Evolution in spatial predator-prey models and the prudent predator: the inadequacy of steady-state organism fitness and the concept of individual and group selection. Complexity 2008, 13:23-44.
20. Hamilton W.D. The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am. Nat. 1963, 97:354-356.
21. Hamilton W.D. The genetic evolution of social behavior. J. Theoret. Biol. 1964, 7:1-52.
22. Helbing D., Yu W. The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:3680-3685.
23. Hills T.T. Animal foraging and the evolution of goal-directed cognition. Cogn. Sci. 2006, 30:3-41.
24. Houston A.I. Mobility limits cooperation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1993, 8:194-196.
25. Killingback T., Doebeli M., Knowlton N. Variable investment, the continuous prisoner's dilemma, and the origin of cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 1999, 266:1723-1728.
26. Koella J.C. The spatial spread of altruism versus the evolutionary response of egoists. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 2000, 267:1979-1985.
27. Kummerli R., Gardner A., West S.A., Griffin A.S. Limited dispersal, budding dispersal, and cooperation: an experimental study. Evolution 2009, 63:939-949.
28. Lion S., van Baalen M. Self-structuring in spatial evolutionary ecology. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:277-295.
29. Luke S., Cioffi-Revilla C., Sullivan K., Balan G.C. MASON: a multi-agent simulation environment. Simulation 2005, 81:517-527.
30. Meloni S., Buscarino A., Fortuna L., Frasca M., Gómez-Gardeñes J., Latora V., Moreno Y. Effects of mobility in a population of prisoner's dilemma players. Phys. Rev. E 2009, 79:067101.
31. Mitteldorf J., Wilson D.S. Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism. J. Theoret. Biol. 2000, 204:481-496.
32. Nonaka E., Holme P. Agent-based model approach to optimal foraging in heterogeneous landscapes: effects of patch clumpiness. Ecography 2007, 30:777-788.
33. Nowak M.A. Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life 2006, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Nowak M.A., Tarnita C.E., Antal T. Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. B 2010, 365:19-30.
35. Odling-Smee F.J., Laland K.N., Feldman M.W. Niche Construction: The Neglected Process in Evolution. Monographs in Population Biology 2003, vol. 37. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
36. Pacheco J.M., Traulsen A., Nowak M.A. Coevolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97:258103.
37. Panait L., Luke S. A pheromone-based utility model for collaborative foraging. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 2004, 36-43. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
38. Pepper J.W. Simple models of assortment through environmental feedback. Artif. Life 2007, 13:1-9.
39. Pepper J.W., Smuts B.B. A mechanism for the evolution of altruism among non-kin: positive assortment through environmental feedback. Am. Nat. 2002, 160:205-213.
40. Perc M., Szolnoki A. Coevolutionary games: a mini review. Biosystems 2010, 99:109-125.
41. Santos F.C., Pacheco J.M., Lenaerts T. Cooperation prevails when individuals adjust their social ties. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2006, 2:1284-1291.
42. Schank J.C. The development of locomotor kinematics in neonatal rats: an agent-based modeling analysis in group and individual contexts. J. Theoret. Biol. 2008, 254:826-842.
43. Scott J., Carrington P. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis 2011, Sage Publications, New York.
44. Smaldino, P.E., 2011. Space and mobility in agent-based models of social interaction. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Davis.
45. Smaldino P.E., Lubell M. An institutional mechanism for assortment in an ecology of games. PLoS One 2011, 6:e23019.
46. Smaldino P.E., Schank J.C. Human mate choice is a complex system. Complexity 2012, 10.1002/cplx.21382.
47. Számadó S., Szalai F., Scheuring I. The effect of dispersal and neighborhood in games of cooperation. J. Theoret. Biol. 2008, 253:221-227.
48. Trivers R.L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 1971, 46:35-57.
49. Vainstein M.H., Solva A.T.C., Arenzon J.J. Does mobility decrease cooperation?. J. Theoret. Biol. 2007, 244:722-728.
50. Van Baalen M., Rand D.A. The unit of selection in viscous populations and the evolution of altruism. J. Theoret. Biol. 1998, 193:631-648.
51. Van Segbroeck S., Santos F.C., Pacheco J.M., Lenaerts T. Coevolution of cooperation, response to adverse social ties and network structure. Games 2010, 1:317-337.
52. Wolfram S. A New Kind of Science 2002, Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL.