How wealth accumulation can promote cooperation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Chadefaux, Thomas ^a   Helbing, Dirk ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CHARACTER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; GAME; INVESTMENT; SELFISHNESS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIOECONOMICS; SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INCOME;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INCOME;

EID: 78149428021     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013471     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Nowak M (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314: 1560-1563.
2. Axelrod R, Hamilton W (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211: 1390.
3. Helbing D, Yu W (2009) The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions. PNAS 106: 3680.
4. Hauert C, Doebeli M (2004) Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game. Nature 428: 643-646.
5. Huberman B, Glance N (1993) Evolutionary games and computer simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90: 7716.
6. Abramson G, Kuperman M (2001) Social games in a social network. Physical Review E 63: 30901.
7. Wu Z, Wang Y (2007) Cooperation enhanced by the difference between interaction and learning neighborhoods for evolutionary spatial prisoner's dilemma games. Physical Review E 75: 41114.
8. Yang H, Wang W, Wu Z, Lai Y, Wang B (2009) Diversity-optimized cooperation on complex networks. Physical Review E 79: 56107.
9. Rong Z, Li X, Wang X (2007) Roles of mixing patterns in cooperation on a scale-free networked game. Physical Review E 76: 27101.
10. Wu Z, Xu X, Huang Z, Wang S, Wang Y (2006) Evolutionary prisonerO ̃ s dilemma game with dynamic preferential selection. Physical Review E 74: 21107.
11. Tomassini M, Luthi L, Giacobini M (2006) Hawks and doves on small-world networks. Physical Review E 73: 16132.
12. Ohtsuki H, Nowak M, Pacheco J (2007) Breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement in evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Physical review letters 98: 108106.
13. Barabási A, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286: 509.
14. Santos F, Pacheco J (2005) Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. Physical Review Letters 95: 98104.
15. Santos F, Pacheco J (2006) A new route to the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 726-733.
16. Holme P, Trusina A, Kim B, Minnhagen P (2003) Prisoners Õ dilemma in realworld acquaintance networks: Spikes and quasiequilibria induced by the interplay between structure and dynamics. Physical Review E 68: 30901.
17. Guan J, Wu Z, Huang Z, Xu X, Wang Y (2006) Promotion of cooperation induced by nonlinear attractive effect in spatial Prisoneŕs Dilemma game. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 76: 1214.
18. Masuda N (2007) Participation costs dismiss the advantage of heterogeneous networks in evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274: 1815.
19. Szolnoki A, Perc M, Danku Z (2008) Towards effective payoffs in the prisoner's dilemma game on scale-free networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 387: 2075-2082.
20. Hauert C, De Monte S, Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (2002) Volunteering as red queen mechanism for cooperation in public goods games. Science 296: 1129.
21. Nowak M, Sigmund K (2005) Evolution of indirect reciprocity. Nature 437: 1291-1298.
22. Ohtsuki H, Iwasa Y (2004) How should we define goodness? -reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 231: 107-120.
23. Perc M, Szolnoki A (2008) Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game. Physical Review E 77: 11904.
24. McNamara JM, Barta Z, Houston AI (2004) Variation in behaviour promotes cooperation in the prisoner's dilemma game. Nature 428: 745-748.
25. Santos F, Santos M, Pacheco J (2008) Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games. Nature 454: 213-216.
26. Merton RK (1968) The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159: 56-63.
27. Traulsen A, Semmann D, Sommerfeld RD, Krambeck H, Milinski M (2010) Human strategy updating in evolutionary games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 2962-2966.
28. Helbing D, Yu W (2010) The future of social experimenting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 5265-5266.
29. Nowak M, May R (1992) Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature 359: 826-829.
30. SzabóG, Fath G (2007) Evolutionary games on graphs. Physics Reports 446: 97-216.
31. Collier P, Hoeffler A (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers 56: 563.
32. Oosterbeek H, Sloof R, Van De Kuilen G (2004) Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Experimental Economics 7: 171-188.
33. Roca CP, Cuesta JA, Sanchez A (2009) Effect of spatial structure on the evolution of cooperation. Physical Review E 80: 046106.