Comparison of the commercial color LCD and the medical monochrome LCD using randomized object test patterns

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Wu, Jay ^a   Wu, Tung H ^b   Han, Rou P ^c   Chang, Shu J ^d   Shih, Cheng T ^e   Sun, Jing Y ^b   Hsu, Shih M ^a  

^a CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CENTRAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

^d INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH   (Taiwan)

^e NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COLOR; COMMERCIAL COLOR LCD; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC MONOCHROME LCD; DISPLAY SYSTEM; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MONITOR; OPTICAL RESOLUTION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; PROCESS DESIGN; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMISED OBJECT TEST PATTERN; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER TERMINAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

COMPUTER TERMINALS; DATA DISPLAY; HUMANS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

EID: 84861688546     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037769     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Huang HK, (2010) PACS and imaging informatics: Basic pinciples and applications New Jersey Wiley-Blackwell.
2. Scott WW, Bluemke DA, Mysko WK, Weller GER, Kelen GD, et al. (1995) Interpretation of emergency department radiographs by radiologists and emergency medicine physicians: teleradiology workstation versus radiograph readings. Radiology 195: 223-229.
3. DICOM (2000) Grayscale display standard function National Electrical Manufacturers Association Part 14.
4. Badano A, Flynn MJ, Martin S, Kanicki J, (2003) Angular dependence of the luminance and contrast in medical monochrome liquid crystal displays. Med Phys 30: 2602-2613.
5. Samei E, Wright SL, (2006) Viewing angle performance of medical liquid crystal displays. Med Phys 33: 645-654.
6. AAPM (2005) Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Task Group 18.
7. SMPTE (1991) Specifications for medical diagnostic imaging test pattern for television monitors and hard-copy recording cameras Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers RP133.
8. Chen TJ, Chuang KS, Chiang YC, Chang JH, Liu RS, (2004) A statistical method for evaluation quality of medical images: a case study in bit discarding and image compression. Comput Med Imag Grap 28: 167-175.
9. Tsalafoutas IA, Tsapaki V, Koulentianos E, Triantopoulou C, (2004) Quality control of a laser camera with the SMPTE test pattern: optical density variations with printing format and frame position. Br J Radiol 77: 52-56.
10. Aldrich J, Rutledge J, (2005) Assessment of PACS display systems. J Digit Imaging 18: 287-295.
11. Wade C, Brennan PC, (2004) Assessment of monitor conditions for the display of radiological diagnostic images and ambient lighting. Br J Radiol 77: 465-471.
12. Yamaguchi M, Fujita H, Uemura M, Asai Y, Wakae H, et al. (2004) Development and evaluation of a new gray-scale test pattern to adjust gradients of thoracic CT imaging. Eur Radiol 14: 2357-2361.
13. Yamaguchi M, Fujita H, Asai Y, Uemura M, Ookura Y, et al. (2005) Psychophysical analysis of monitor display functions affecting observer diagnostic performance of CT image on liquid crystal display monitors. Eur Radiol 15: 2487-2496.
14. Uemura M, Asai Y, Yamaguchi M, Fujita H, Shintani Y, et al. (2006) Psychophysical evaluation of calibration curve for diagnostic LCD monitor. Radiol Med 24: 653-658.
15. Doyle AJ, Gunn MLD, Gamble GD, Zhang M, (2002) Personal computer-based PACS display system: comparison with a dedicated PACS workstation for review of computed radiographic images in rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Radiol 9: 646-653.
16. Ong AH, Pitman AG, Tan SY, Gledhill S, Hennessy O, et al. (2011) Comparison of 3MP medical-grade to 1MP office-grade LCD monitors in mammographic diagnostic and perceptual performance. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 55: 153-162.
17. McDonald L, Cramer B, Barrett B, (2006) Detection rates in pediatric diagnostic imaging: a Picture Archive and Communication System compared with a web-based imaging system. Can Assoc Radiol J 57: 30-34.
18. Brem MH, Böhner C, Brenning A, Gelse K, Radkow T, et al. (2006) Evaluation of low-cost computer monitors for the detection of cervical spine injuries in the emergency room: an observer confidence-based study. Emerg Med J 23: 850-853.
19. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL, (1988) Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44: 837-845.
20. Wang J, Compton K, Peng Q, (2003) Proposal of a quality-index or metric for soft copy display systems: contrast sensitivity study. J Digit Imaging 16: 185-202.
21. Geijer H, Geijer M, Forsberg L, Kheddache S, Sund P, (2007) Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology. J Digit Imaging 20: 114-121.
22. ACR (2007) Technical standard for electronic practice of medical imaging American College of Radiology.