Psychophysical evaluation of calibration curve for diagnostic LCD monitor

Radiation Medicine - Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 24, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 653-658

  Uemura, Masanobu ^a   Asai, Yoshiyuki ^a   Yamaguchi, Michihiro ^b   Fujita, Hideki ^b   Shintani, Yuuko ^a   Sanada, Shigeru ^c  

^a KINDAI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b OSAKA PREFECTURAL MEDICAL CENTER FOR RESPIRATORY AND ALLERGIC DISEASES   (Japan)

^c KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Diagnostic LCD monitors; Grayscale standard display function; Psychophysical gradient ; ROC analysis; Visually recognized contrast

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

CALIBRATION; COMPUTER TERMINALS; HUMANS; LIQUID CRYSTALS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REFERENCE STANDARDS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 33846846718     PISSN: 02882043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11604-006-0085-3     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM). Part 14: Grayscale Standard Display Function. Rosslyn, VA, USA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association; 1999. p. 1-14.
2. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 18 Imaging Informatics Subcommittee. 2005.
3. Kanamori H. The determination of the optimum density and the density-range of radiographs from visual effects. Jpn J Appl Phys 1964;3:286-94.
4. Kanamori H. Determination of optimum film density range for roentgenograms from visual effects. Acta Radiol Diagn 1966;4:463-76.
5. Asai Y, Shintani Y, Yamaguchi M, Uemura M, Matsumoto M, Kanamori H. Evaluation of grey-scale standard display function as a calibration tool for diagnostic liquid crystal display monitors using psychophysical analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005;43:319-24.
6. Yamaguchi M, Fujita H, Asai Y, Uemura M, Ookura Y, Matsumoto M, et al. Psychophysical analysis of monitor display function affecting observer diagnostic performance of CT image on liquid crystal display monitors. Eur Radiol 2005;15:2487-96.
7. Uemura M, Asai Y,Yamaguchi M, Shintani Y, Sanada S. Comparison of gradation characteristics between three typical medical imaging display devices using psychophysical analysis. Jpn J Radiol Technol 2005;61:1587-91.
8. Yamaguchi M, Fujita H, Uemura M, Asai Y, Wakae H, Ishifuro M. Development and evaluation of a new gray-scale test pattern to adjust gradients of thoracic CT imaging. Eur Radiol 2004;14:2357-61.
9. Patel AS. Spatial resolution by the human visual system: the effect of mean retinal illuminance. J Opt Soc Am 1966;56:689-94.
10. Barten PGJ. Physical model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye. Proc SPIE 1992;1666:57-72.
11. Barten PGJ. Spatio-temporal model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its temporal aspects. Proc SPIE 1993;1913:2-14.
12. Shiraishi J, Katsuragawa S, Ikezoe J, Matsumoto T, Kobayashi T, Komatsu K. Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:71-4.
13. Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986;21:720-33.
14. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989;24:234-45.
15. Shiraishi J. The evaluation of the diagnosability - the experimental method of the ROC analysis. Jpn J Radiol Technol 1999;55:362-8.
16. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.