Gender differences in distal femoral morphology and the role of gender specific implants in total knee replacement: A prospective clinical study

Knee

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 28-31

  Guy, S P ^a   Farndon, M A ^a   Sidhom, S ^a   Al Lami, M ^a   Bennett, C ^a   London, N J ^a  

^a Harrogate District General   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gender knee replacement; Morphometry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY WEIGHT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84855244924     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2010.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barrett W.P. The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference?. Orthopedics 2006, 29(9 Suppl):S53-S55.
2. Booth R.E. Sex and the total knee: gender-sensitive designs. Orthopedics 2006, 29(9):836-838.
3. Booth R.E. The gender-specific (female) knee. Orthopedics 2006, 29(9):768-769.
4. Greene K.A. Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(7 Suppl 3):27-31.
5. Dalury D.F., Mason J.B., Murphy J.A., Adams M.J. Analysis of the outcome in male and female patients using a unisex total knee replacement system. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009, 91(3):357-360.
6. Woodland L.H., Francis R.S. Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions. Am J Sports Med 1992, 20(2):208-211.
7. Poilvache P.L., Insall J.N., Scuderi G.R., Font-Rodriguez D.E. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 331:35-46.
8. Livingston L.A. The quadriceps angle: a review of the literature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998, 28(2):105-109.
9. Chin K.R., Dalury D.F., Zurakowski D., Scott R.D. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2002, 15(4):213-217.
10. Csintalan R.P., Schutz M.M., Woo J., McMahon P.J., Lee T.Q. Gender differences in patellofemoral joint biomechanics. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 402:260-269.
11. Hitt K., Shurman J.R., Greene K., McCarthy J., Moskal J., Hoeman T., et al. Anthropomorphic measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(Suppl 4):115-122.
12. Dargel J., Michael J.W.P., Feiser J., Roland I., Koebke J. Human knee joint anatomy revisited: morphometry in the light of sex-specific total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26(3):346-353.
13. Conley S., Rosenburg A., Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007, 15(Suppl 1):S31-S36.
14. Merchant A.C., Arendt E.A., Dye S.F., Fredericson M., Grelsamer R.P., Leadbetter W.B., et al. The female knee: anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466(12):3059-3065.
15. Kim Y.H., Choi Y., Kim J.S. Comparison of standard and gender-specific posterior-cruciate-retaining high-flexion total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92(5):639-645.
16. Kim Y.H., Choi Y., Kim J.S. Comparison of a standard and a gender-specific posterior Cruciate-substituting high-flexion knee prosthesis: a prospective, randomized, short-term outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92(10):1911-1920.
17. Mensch J.S., Amstutz H.C. Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975, 112:231-241.
18. Rand J.A., Ilstrup D.M. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty.Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991, 73(3):397-409.
19. Rand J.A., Trousdale R.T., Ilstrup D.M., Harmsen W.S. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(2):259-265.
20. Vasquez-Vela Johnson G., Worland R.L., Keenan J., Norambuena N. Patient demographics as a predictor of the ten-year survival rate in primary total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003, 85(1):52-56.
21. Fehring T.K., Murphy J.A., Hayes T.D., Roberts D.W., Pomoroy D.L., Griffin W.L. Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 428:40-50.
22. Himanen A.K., Belt E., Nevalainen J., Hämäläinen M., Lehto M.U. Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Finnish Arthroplasty Register report on 8, 467 operations carried out between 1985 and 1999. Acta Orthop 2005, 76(1):85-88.
23. Roberts V.I., Esler C.N., Harper W.M. A 15-year follow-up study of 4606 primary total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89(11):1452-1456.
24. MacDonald S.J., Charron K.D., Bourne R.B., Naudie D.D., McCalden R.W., Rorabeck C.H. The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008, 466(11):2612-2616.
25. Robertsson O., Dunbar M., Pehrsson T., Knutson K., Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27, 372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000, 71(3):262-267.
26. Baker P.N., Khaw F.M., Kirk L.M., Esler C.N., Gregg P.J. Randomised control trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89(12):1608-1614.
27. Robertsson O., Knutson K., Lewold S., Lidgren L. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41, 223 knees operated on in1988-1997. Acta Orthop Scand 2001, 72(5):503-513.
28. Ritter M.A., Harty L.D., Davis K.E., Meding J.B., Berend M.E. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(7):1278-1285.
29. Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N., Windsor R.E., Moran M.C. Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989, 71(5):798-803.
30. Font-Rodriguez D.E., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997, 345:79-86.
31. Gill G.S., Joshi A.B. Long-term results of Kinematic Condylar total knee replacement. An analysis of 404 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83(3):355-358.
32. Khaw F.M., Kirk L.M., Morris R.W., Gregg P.J. A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Ten-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002, 84(5):658-666.
33. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Gender-specific knee replacements: a technology overview. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008, 16(2):63-67.
34. Whiteside L.A. The effect of patient age, gender, and tibial component fixation on pain relief after cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991, 271:21-27.
35. Wright R.J., Sledge C.B., Poss R., Ewald F.C., Walsh M.E., Lingard E.A. Patient-reported survivorship after Kinemax total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(11):2464-2470.
36. Kane R.L., Saleh K.J., Wilt T.J., Bershadsky B. The functional outcomes of knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(8):1719-1724.
37. Bourne R.B., McCalden R.W., Macdonald S.J., Mokete L., Guerin J. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 464:27-31.
38. Kim J., Nelson C.L., Lotke P.A. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(7):1479-1484.
39. Vaidya S.V., Ranawat C.S., Aroojis A., Laud N.S. Anthropometric measurements to design a total knee prostheses for the Indian population. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15(1):79-85.
40. Uehara K., Kadoya Y., Kobayashi A., Ohashi H., Yamano Y. Anthropometry of the proximal tibia to design a total knee prosthesis for the Japanese population. J Arthroplasty 2000, 17(8):1028-1032.
41. Yip D.K., Zhu Y.H., Chiu K.Y., Ng T.P. Distal rotational alignment of the Chinese femur and its relevance in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(5):613-619.
42. Ho W.P., Cheng C.K., Liau J.J. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. Knee 2006, 13(1):12-14.
43. Kwak D.S., Surendran S., Pengatteeri Y.H., Park S.E., Choi K.N., Gopinathan P., et al. Morphometry of the proximal tibia to design the tibial component of total knee arthroplasty for the Korean population. Knee 2007, 14(4):295-300.
44. Shelbourne K.D., Gray T., Benner R.W. Intercondylar notch width measurement differences between African American and white men and women with intact anterior cruciate ligament knees. Am J Sports Med 2007, 35(8):1304-1307.
45. Bellemans J., Carpentier K., Vandenneucker H., Vanlauwe J., Victor J. The John Insall Award: both morphotype and gender influence the shape of the knee undergoing TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468(1):29-36.
46. Mahoney O.M., Kinsey T. Overhang of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty: risk factors and clinical consequences. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92(5):1115-1121.