Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 177-182

  Ben Dor, Itsik ^a   Torguson, Rebecca ^a   Deksissa, Teshome ^a   Bui, Anh B ^a   Xue, Zhenyi ^a   Satler, Lowell F ^a   Pichard, Augusto D ^a   Waksman, Ron ^a  

^a WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Fractional flow reserve; Intermediate coronary lesion; Intravascular ultrasound; Minimal lumen area

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84861662892     PISSN: 15538389     EISSN: 18780938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2011.12.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, Hiratza LF, Eastham CL, Harrison DG, Marcus ML Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?. N Engl J Med 1984, 310:819-824.
2. Ozaki Y, Violaris AG, Kobayashi T, Keane D, Camenzind E, Di Mario C, de Feyter P, Roelandt JR, Serruys PW Comparison of coronary luminal quantification obtained from intracoronary ultrasound and both geometric and videodensitometric quantitative angiography before and after balloon angioplasty and directional atherectomy. Circulation 1997, 96:491-499.
3. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007, 49:2105-2111.
4. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrøm T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF, FAME Study Investigators Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009, 360:213-224.
5. Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Abizaid A, Lansky AJ, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Wu H, Pappas C, Kent KM, Leon MB Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: importance of lumen dimensions. Circulation 1999, 100:256-261.
6. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, McPherson J, Farhat N, Marso SP, Parise H, Templin B, White R, Zhang Z, Serruys PW, PROSPECT Investigators A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med 2011, 364:226-235.
7. Ben-Dor I, Torguson R, Gaglia MA, Gonzalez MA, Maluenda G, Bui AB, Bui AB, Xue Z, Satler LF, Suddath WO, Lindsay J, Pichard AD, Waksman R Correlation between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound lumen area in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. EuroIntervention 2011, 7:225-233.
8. Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, Suzuki K, Kawana M, Kasanuki H Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1999, 100:250-255.
9. Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, Gimelli G, Nishida T, Adamian M, Corvaja N, Di Mario C, Colombo A Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 2001, 87:136-141.
10. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS, Dunning A, Defrance T, Lansky A, Leipsic J, Min JK Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms: results from the Prospective Multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011, 58:1989-1997.
11. Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, Mintz GS, Kim WJ, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011, 4:65-71.
12. Lee CH, Tai BC, Soon CY, Low AF, Poh KK, Yeo TC, Lim GH, Yip J, Omar AR, Teo SG, Tan HC New set of intravascular ultrasound-derived anatomic criteria for defining functionally significant stenoses in small coronary arteries (results from Intravascular Ultrasound Diagnostic Evaluation of Atherosclerosis in Singapore [IDEAS] study). Am J Cardiol 2010, 105:1378-1384.
13. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, de Muinck ED, Hoorntje JC, Escaned J, Stella PR, Boersma E, Bartunek J, Koolen JJ, Wijns W Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 2001, 103:2928-2934.
14. Wongpraparut N, Yalamanchili V, Pasnoori V, Satran A, Chandra M, Masden R, Leesar MA Thirty-month outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided versus conventional multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2005, 96:877-884.
15. Legalery P, Schiele F, Seronde MF, Meneveau N, Wei H, Didier K, Blonde MC, Caulfield F, Bassand JP One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 2005, 26:2623-2629.
16. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Bornschein B, van't Veer M., Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrøm T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, De Bruyne B., FAME Study Investigators Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 56:177-184.
17. Muller O, Mangiacapra F, Ntalianis A, Verhamme KM, Trana C, Hamilos M, et al. Long-term follow-up after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment strategy in patients with an isolated proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011, 4:1175-1182.
18. Nam CW, Yoon HJ, Cho YK, Park HS, Kim H, Hur SH, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Wyffels E, Heyndrickx GR, van Rooij FJ, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Wijns W, Barbato E, De Bruyne B Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 3:812-817.