Skeletal and dental outcomes of a new magnetic functional appliance, the Sydney Magnoglide, in Class II correction

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 141, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 759-772

  Phelan, Angie ^a   Tarraf, Nour Eldin ^a   Taylor, Paul ^a   Hönscheid, Ralf ^b   Drescher, Dieter ^b   Baccetti, Tiziano ^c   Darendeliler, M Ali ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MAGNET; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, INTERCEPTIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84861590135     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. J.B. McLain, and W.R. Proffit Oral health status in the United States: prevalence of malocclusion J Dent Ed 49 1985 386 396
2. W.R. Proffit, H.W. Fields, and L.J. Moray Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates form the N-HANES III survey Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 13 1998 97 106
3. J.A. McNamara Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age Angle Orthod 51 1981 177 202
4. N. Wahl Orthodontics in 3 millennia. Chapter 9: functional appliances to midcentury Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 2006 829 833
5. P. Cozza, T. Baccetti, L. Franchi, L. De Toffol, and J.A. McNamara Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 599 2006 e1 e12
6. K. O'Brien, J. Wright, F. Conboy, Y. Sanjie, N. Mandall, and S. Chadwick Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 2003 128 137
7. A.D. Vardimon, T.M. Graber, D. Drescher, and C. Bourauel Rare earth magnets and impaction Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100 1991 494 512
8. A.M. Blechman Magnetic force systems in orthodontics. Clinical results of a pilot study Am J Orthod 87 1985 201 210
9. A.A. Gianelly, A.S. Vaitas, and W.M. Thomas The use of magnets to move molars distally Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96 1989 161 167
10. A.A. Gianelly, A.S. Vaitas, W.M. Thomas, and D.G. Berger Distalization of molars with repelling magnets J Clin Orthod 22 1988 40 44
11. L. Bondemark, J. Kurol, and M. Bernhold Repelling magnets versus superelastic nickel-titanium coils in simultaneous distal movement of first and second molars Angle Orthod 64 1994 189 198
12. A.D. Vardimon, T.M. Graber, L.R. Voss, and T.P. Muller Functional orthopedic magnetic appliance (FOMA) III - modus operandi Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97 1990 135 148
13. M.A. Darendeliler, and J.P. Joho Magnetic activator device II (MAD II) for correction of Class II, division 1 malocclusions Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 103 1993 223 239
14. A.D. Vardimon, J.J. Stutzmann, T.M. Graber, L.R. Voss, and A.G. Petrovic Functional orthopedic magnetic appliance (FOMA) II - modus operandi Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95 1989 371 387
15. A.D. Vardimon, T.M. Graber, L.R. Voss, and E. Verrusio Magnetic versus mechanical expansion with different force thresholds and points of force application Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92 1987 455 466
16. M.A. Darendeliler, M. Chiarini, and J.P. Joho Case report: early Class III treatment with magnetic appliances J Clin Orthod 27 1993 563 569
17. E.L. Dellinger A clinical assessment of the active vertical corrector - a nonsurgical alternative for skeletal open bite treatment Am J Orthod 89 1986 428 436
18. M.A. Darendeliler, A. Darendeliler, and M. Mandurino Clinical application of magnets in orthodontics and biological implications: a review Eur J Orthod 19 1997 431 442
19. J.H. Noar, and R.D. Evans Rare earth magnets in orthodontics: an overview Br J Orthod 26 1999 29 37
20. V. Kalra, C.J. Burstone, and R. Nanda Effects of a fixed magnetic appliance on the dentofacial complex Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 95 1989 467 478
21. A.D. Vardimon, S. Koklu, H. Iseri, N. Shpack, J. Fricke, and L. Mete An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS) Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 120 2001 416 426
22. M.A. Darendeliler Use of magnetic forces in growth modification Semin Orthod 12 2006 41 51
23. J.P. Joho, and M.A. Darendeliler Dental and skeletal effects of the MAD II (magnetic activator device II) appliance in the correction of Class II/I Eur J Orthod 15 1993 338
24. T. Baccetti, L. Franchi, L.R. Toth, and J.A. McNamara Jr. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 2000 159 170
25. T. Baccetti, L. Franchi, and J.A. McNamara Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics Semin Orthod 11 2005 119 129
26. K. Hansen, H. Pancherz, and U. Hägg Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study Eur J Orthod 13 1991 471 481
27. H. Pancherz, and U. Hägg Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance Am J Orthod 88 1985 273 287
28. L. Franchi, T. Baccetti, and J.A. McNamara Jr. Mandibular growth as related to cervical vertebral maturation and body height Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 2000 335 340
29. T. Baccetti, L. Franchi, and J.A. McNamara Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth Angle Orthod 72 2002 316 323
30. B. Hassel, and A. Farman Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107 1995 58 66
31. L.M. Fuck, and D. Drescher Force systems in the initial phase of orthodontic treatment - a comparison of different leveling arch wires J Orofac Orthop 67 2006 6 18
32. H. Pancherz The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation Am J Orthod 82 1982 104 113
33. C. Steiner Cephalometrics for you and me Am J Orthod 39 1953 729 755
34. R.M. Ricketts Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years Angle Orthod 51 1981 115 150
35. J.A. McNamara Jr. A method of cephalometric evaluation Am J Orthod 86 1984 449 469
36. G. Dahlberg Statistical methods for medical and biological students 1940 G. Allen & Unwin London, United Kingdom
37. H. Pancherz The effects, limitations, and long-term dentofacial adaptations to treatment with the Herbst appliance Semin Orthod 3 1997 232 243
38. H. Pancherz Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance Am J Orthod 76 1979 423 442
39. M. Konik, H. Pancherz, and K. Hansen The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 1997 87 91
40. D.I. Lund, and P.J. Sandler The effects of twin blocks: a prospective controlled study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 1998 104 110
41. C. Mills, and K. McCulloch Treatment effects of the twin-block appliance: a cephalometric study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 114 1998 15 24
42. L.R. Toth, and J.A. McNamara Jr. Skeletal and dentoalveolar adaptations produced by twin-block appliance treatment Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 116 1999 597 609
43. H. Pancherz, O. Malmgren, U. Hägg, J. Omblus, and K. Hansen Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy Eur J Orthod 11 1989 17 30
44. X. Du, U. Hägg, and A.B.M. Rabie Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximal jumping of the mandible Eur J Orthod 24 2002 167 174
45. F. Falck, and R. Frankel Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibualr advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 96 1989 333 341
46. F.Y. Leung, A.B. Rabie, and U. Hägg Neovascularization and bone formation in the condyle during stepwise mandibular advancement Eur J Orthod 26 2004 137 141
47. L. Bondemark, and J. Kurol Force-distance relation and properties of repelling Sm-Co5 magnets in orthodontic clinical use: an experimental model Scand J Dent Res 100 1992 228 231
48. G.P. Mancini, J.H. Noar, and R.D. Evans The physical characteristics of neodymium iron boron magnets for tooth extrusion Eur J Orthod 21 1999 541 550
49. C. Bourauel, A.D. Vardimon, D. Drescher, and G.P. Schmuth A functional orthodontic magnetic system (FOMA) after Vardimon. 1. A three-dimensional analysis of the force system of the attractive magnets Fortschr Kieferorthop 56 1995 274 282
50. L. Wieslander Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition Am J Orthod 86 1984 1 13
51. A. Chayanupatkul, A.B. Rabie, and U. Hägg Temporomandibular response to early and late removal of bite-jumping devices Eur J Orthod 25 2003 465 470
52. U. Hägg, X. Du, and A.B. Rabie Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 2002 477 485
53. H. Pancherz, and K. Hansen Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation Eur J Orthod 8 1986 215 228
54. H. Pancherz The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II malocclusions Eur J Orthod 3 1981 49 60
55. B. Nelson, U. Hägg, K. Hansen, and M. Bendeus A long-term follow-up study of Class II malocclusion correction after treatment with Class II elastics or fixed functional appliances term Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 132 2007 499 503
56. E. Sanden, H. Pancherz, and K. Hansen Complications during Herbst appliance treatment J Clin Orthod 38 2004 130 134