An assessment of skeletal and dental responses to the functional magnetic system (FMS)

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 416-426

  Vardimon, Alexander D ^a   Köklü, Saduman ^b   Iseri, Haluk ^c   Shpack, Nir ^a   Fricke, Jorg ^a   Mete, Levent ^d  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b Private Practice in Orthodontics   (Germany)

^c ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^d Private Practice   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; MAGNETISM; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL ARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW; MAGNETICS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH MOVEMENT; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0035490278     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.116084     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Björk A. The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment: a discussion based on cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases. Am J Orthod 1951;37:437-58.
2. Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:250-8.
3. Aelbers CMF, Dermaut LR. Orthopedics in orthodontics: Part I, fiction or reality - a review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:513-9.
4. Dermaut LR, Aelbers CMF. Orthopedics in orthodontics: fiction or reality - a review of the literature - Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:667-71.
5. McNamara JA Jr, Peterson JE Jr, Alexander RG. Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition. Semin Orthod 1996;2:114-37.
6. Barton S, Cook P. Predicting functional appliance treatment outcome in Class II malocclusion - a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:282-6.
7. Harvold EP, Vargervik K. Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. Am J Orthod 1971;60:478-90.
8. Pancherz H. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:125-34.
9. Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1985;88:242-51.
10. Konik M, Pancherz H, Hansen K. The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:87-91.
11. Fränkel R, Reiss W. Zur Problematic der Unterkiefernachentwicklung bei Distalbissfällen. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1970;31: 345-55.
12. Righellis EG. Treatment effect of Fränkel, activator and extra-oral traction appliances. Angle Orthod 1983;53:107-21.
13. Paulsen HU. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: a long-term radiographic study. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:657-68.
14. Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and post-treatment effects of acrylic splint Herbst appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:429-38.
15. Pancherz H, Malmgren O, Hägg U, Ömblus J, Hansen K. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:17-30.
16. Cura N, Saran M, Öztürk Y, Sürmeli N. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of activator, activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:36-45.
17. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:134-44.
18. Cope JB, Buschung PH, Cope DD, Parker J, Blockwood HO. Quantitative evaluation of the craniofacial changes with Jasper jumper therapy. Angle Orthod 1994;64:113-22.
19. Tulloch C, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:391-400.
20. Weiland FJ, Ingerval B, Bantleon HP, Drosch H. Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper jumper. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:19-27.
21. Pancherz H. The modern Herbst appliance. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, editors. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 336-66.
22. Jasper JJ, McNamara JA Jr, Mollenhauer B. The modified Herbst appliance (Jasper jumper). In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, editors. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 367-78.
23. Eckhart JE. Introducing the MARA. Clinical Impressions 1998;7:2-5.
24. Vardimon AD, Stutzmann JJ, Graber TM, Voss LR, Petrovic AG. Functional orthopedic magnetic appliance (FOMA) II - Modus operandi. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;95:371-87.
25. Köklü SO, Drescher D, Vardimon AD. Klinische Erfahrungen mit dem funktionskieferorthopädischen Magnetsystem nach Vardimon (FMS) bei Klass II/I Fällen. Informat Orthod Kieferorthop 1996;28:505-15.
26. Vardimon AD, Drescher D, Bourauel C, Schmuth GPF, Graber TM. The magnetic functional system. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, editors. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 299-318.
27. Clark WJ. The twin block technique. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, editors. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 268-98.
28. Witt E. Behandlungskonzepte. In: Miethke RR, Drescher D, editors. Kleines Lehrbuch der Angle-Klasse II, 1 unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Behandlung. Berlin: Quintessenz; 1996. p. 93-105.
29. Witt E, Komposch G. Intermaxilläre Kraftwirkung bimaxillarer Geräte. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1971;32:345-52.
30. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. Am J Orthod 1982;82:104-13.
31. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible: a synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:1-46.
32. Solow B, Siersbök-Nielsen S. Growth changes in head posture related to craniofacial development. Am J Orthod 1986;89:132-40.
33. Iseri H, Solow B. Growth displacement of the maxilla in girls studied by the implant method. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:389-98.
34. Williams S, Melsen B. Condylar development and mandibular rotation and displacement during activator treatment. An implant study. Am J Orthod 1982;81:322-6.
35. Williams S, Melsen B. The interplay between sagittal and vertical growth factors. An implant study of activator treatment. Am J Orthod 1982;81:327-32.
36. Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:319-29.
37. Berenstein L, Ulbrich R, Gianelly A. Orthopedic versus orthodontics in Class II treatment. An implant study. Am J Orthod 1977;72:549-59.
38. Pancherz H, Anehus-Pancherz M. The headgear effect of the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric long-term study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:510-20.
39. Steinhardt J, Borchers N, Schleiff C. Vertikale Veränderungen am Fernröntgenseitenbild nach funktionskieferorthopädischer Therapie. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1990;51:284-92.
40. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P. Mandibular changes during functional treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:153-61.
41. Lund DI, Sandler PK. The effect of twin blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 199;113:104-10.
42. McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein FL, Shanghnessy TG. Skeletal and dental change following functional regulator therapy. Am J Orthod 1985;88:91-110.
43. Sander FG, Wichelhaus A. Können Magnete oder zusätzliche intermaxilläre Kräfte die Wierkungsweise von Vorschubdoppelplatten verbessern. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1994;55:279-89.
44. Birkenback L, Melsen B, Trep S. A laminograph study of the alterations in the temporomandibular joint following activator treatment. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:257-66.
45. Petrovic AG, Stutzmann JJ, Grasson N. The facial length of the mandible: is it genetically predetermined? In: Carlson DS, editor. Craniofacial biology. Monograph 10. Craniofacial Growth Series, Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1981. p. 105-25.
46. Petrovic AG. Experimental and cybernetic approaches to the mechanism of action of functional appliances on mandibular growth. In: McNamara JA Jr, Ribbens KA, editors. Malocclusion and periodontium. Monograph 15. Craniofacial Growth Series, Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1983. p. 213-68.
47. Petrovic AG, Stutzmann JJ. Research methodology and findings in applied craniofacial growth studies. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, editors. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 13-63.
48. Ramfjord SP, Enlow RD. Anterior displacement of the mandible in adult rhesus monkeys: long-term observation. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:517-31.
49. Stutzmann JJ, Petrovic AG. A new parameter for estimating condylar growth direction. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic AG, editors. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 64-73.
50. McNamara JA, Hinton RJ, Hoffman DL. Histologic analysis of temporomandibular joint adaptation to protrusive function in young adult rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Am J Orthod 1982;82:288-98.
51. McNamara JA. Dentofacial adaptations in adult patients following functional regulator therapy. Am J Orthod 1984;85:57-71.
52. Arat M, Iseri H, Özdiler E, Gürbüz F. Zeitfactor bei funktioneller Behandlung der skelettalen Klasse II. Informat Orthod Kieferorthop 1988;3:363-76.
53. Hagg U, Taranger J. Maturation indicators at the pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod 1982;82:299-339.
54. Pancherz H, Hagg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. Am J Orthod 1985;88:273-87.
55. Remmer KR, Mamandras AH, Hunter WS, Way DC. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance. Am J Orthod 1985;88:363-72.