MRI and its role in the evaluation and surgical decision making in patients with challenging IPP presentations: Descriptions of MRI findings and algorithm for patient management

BJU International

Volumn 109, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1848-1852

  McPhail, E Fred ^a   Nehra, Ajay ^a   Bruner, Bryan C ^a   Kawashima, Akira ^b   King, Bernard F ^b   Kim, Bohyun ^b  

^a DEPARTMENT OF UROLOGY   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

imaging; MRI; prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRACHYTHERAPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CYSTECTOMY; CYSTITIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; HUMAN; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM SURGERY; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PEYRONIE DISEASE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PENILE PROSTHESIS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84861577311     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10683.x     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Carmignani G, et al,. AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2000; 37: 50-5
2. Lotan Y, Roehrborn C, McConnell JD, Hendin BN,. Factors influencing the outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery at a teaching institution. Urology 2003; 62: 918-21
3. Dubocq F, Tefilli M, Gheiler EL, Li H, Dhabuwala CB,. Long-term mechanical reliability of multicomponent inflatable penile prosthesis: comparison of device survival. Urology 1998; 52: 277-81
4. Shellock FG, Curtis J,. MR imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: an updated review. Radiology 1991; 180: 541-50
5. Thiel DD, Broderick G, Bridges M,. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating inflatable penile prosthesis malfunction and complaints. Int J Impot Res 2003; 15: S155-61
6. Moncada I, Hernandez C, Jara J, et al,. Buckling of cylinders may cause prolonged penile pain after prosthesis implantation: a case control study using magnetic resonance imaging of the penis. J Urol 1998; 160: 67-71
7. Kirkham AP, Illing R, Minhas S, Minhas S, Allen C,. MR imaging of nonmalignant penile lesions. Radiographics 2008; 28: 837-53
8. Hricak H, Marotti M, Gilbert TJ, et al,. Normal penile anatomy and abnormal penile conditions: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1988; 169: 683-90
9. Carson CC, Noh C,. Distal penile prosthesis extrusion: treatment with distal corporoplasty or Gortex windsock reinforcement. Int J Impot Res 2002; 14: 81-4
10. Furlow WL, Goldwasser B,. Salvage of the eroded inflatable penile prosthesis: a new concept. J Urol 1987; 138: 312-4
11. Brant MD, Ludlow J, Mulcahy JJ,. The prosthesis salvage operation: immediate replacement of the infected penile prosthesis. J Urol 1996; 155: 155-7