Buckling of cylinders may cause prolonged penile pain after prosthesis implantation: A case control study using magnetic resonance imaging of the penis

Journal of Urology

Volumn 160, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 67-71

  Moncada, Ignacio ^a   Hernández, Carlos ^a   Jara, José ^a   Hernández, Luis ^a   Lafuente, Javier ^a   Lledó, Enrique ^a   Rodriguez, Elena ^a   De Tejada, Iñigo Sáenz ^a  

^a HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO GREGORIO MARAÑÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Complications; Pain; Penile erection; Penis; Prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PENIS PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 0344678335     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63033-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mulcahy, J. J.: Prevention and correction of penile implant problems. AUA Update Series, lesson 13, vol. 27, 1994.
2. Lewis, R. W. and McLaren, R.: Reoperation for penile prosthesis implantation. Probl. Urol., 7: 381, 1993.
3. Kabalin, J. N. and Kessler, R.: Penile prosthesis surgery: review of ten-year experience and examination of reoperations. Urology, 33: 17, 1989.
4. Lopes, T. M., Martins, F. E., Dias, J. C. and Vickers, M. A.: Complications of penile prosthetic surgery. Eur. Urol. Update Series, 4: 58, 1995.
5. De Stefani, S., Simonato, A., Capone, M., Ciampalini, S., Maffezzini, M. and Carmignani, G.: The benefit of glans fixation in prosthetic penile surgery. J. Urol., 152: 1533, 1994.
6. Wilson, S. K., Cleves, M. A. and Delk, J. R., Jr.: Ultrex cylinders: problems with the uncontrolled lengthening (the S-shaped deformity). J. Urol., 155: 135, 1996.
7. Garber, B. B.: Mentor Alpha 1 inflatable penile prosthesis: patient satisfaction and device reliability. Urology, 43: 214, 1994.
8. Randrup, E., Wilson, S., Mobley, D., Suarez, G., Mekras, G. and Baum, N.: Clinical experience with Mentor Alpha 1 inflatable penile prosthesis. Report on 333 cases. Urology, 42: 305, 1993.
9. Parsons, C. L., Stein, P. C., Dobke, M. K., Virden, C. P. and Frank, D. H.: Diagnosis and therapy of subclinically infected prostheses. Surg. Gynec. Obst., 177: 504, 1993.
10. Mulcahy, J. J., Brant, M. D. and Ludlow, J. K.: Management of infected penile implants. Techn. Urol., 1: 115, 1995.
11. Cohan, R. H., Dunnick, N. R. and Carson, C. C.: Radiology of penile prostheses. AJR, 152: 925, 1989.
12. McLaren, R. H. and Barrett, D. M.: Patient and partner satisfaction with the AMS 700 penile prosthesis. J. Urol., 147: 62, 1992.
13. Lewis, R. W.: Long-term results of penile prosthetic implants. Urol. Clin. N. Amer., 22: 847, 1995.
14. Kaufman, J. J.: Prevention and management of complications of penile prosthesis. AUA Update Series, lesson 6, vol. 2, 1983.
15. Kimoto, Y. and Iwatsubo, E.: Penile prostheses for the management of the neuropathic bladder and sexual dysfunction in spinal cord injury patients: long term follow up. Paraplegia, 32: 336, 1994.
16. Montague, D. K.: Editorial comment. J. Urol., 155: 137, 1996.
17. Hricak, H., Marotti, M., Gilbert, T. J., Lue, T. F., Wetzel, L. H., McAninch, J. W. and Tanagho, E. A.: Normal penile anatomy and abnormal penile conditions: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology, 169: 683, 1988.
18. Levin, M. F., Munk, P. L., Vellet, A. D. and Chin, J. L.: Self-contained, inflatable penile prosthesis: magnetic resonance appearance. Australas. Rad., 38: 51, 1994.
19. Shellock, F. G. and Curtis, J. S.: MR imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: an updated review. Radiology, 180: 541, 1991.
20. Licht, M. R., Montague, D. K., Angermeier, K. W. and Lakin, M. M.: Cultures from genitourinary prosthesis ar reoperation: questioning the role of Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic infection. J. Urol., 154: 387, 1995.