Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating inflatable penile prosthesis malfunction and complaints

International Journal of Impotence Research

Volumn 15, Issue SUPPL. 5, 2003, Pages

  Thiel, D D ^a   Broderick, G A ^a   Bridges, M ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; Imaging; Inflatable penile prosthesis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Penile prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; EVALUATION; HERNIA; HUMAN; MALE; MALE GENITAL SYSTEM SURGERY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PENILE FIBROSIS; PENIS PROSTHESIS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PLASTIC SURGERY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REIMPLANTATION; TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING; TUNICA ALBUGINEA;

AGED; HUMANS; IMPOTENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PENILE PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE;

EID: 0142215446     PISSN: 09559930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901094     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Mayo Clinic Health Letter: Erectile Dysfunction in America. Mayo Clinic: Rochester, MN, May 1986, pp. 1-8.
2. Krane RJ. Penile prosthesis. Urol Clin North Am 1998; 15: 103-109.
3. Kirschenbaum A, Mitty HA. Penile prosthesis. Urol Radiol 1998; 10: 160-165.
4. Mulcahy JJ. Prevention and correction of penile implant problems. AUA Update Series, lesson 13, Vol. 27, 1994.
5. Lewis RW, McLaren R. Reoperation for penile prosthesis implantation. Probl Urol 1993; 7: 381.
6. Cohan RH, Dunnick NR, Carson CC. Radiology of penile prosthesis. AJR 1989; 152: 925.
7. Moncada I et al. Buckling of cylinders may cause prolonged penile pain after prosthesis implantation: a case control study using magnetic resonance imaging of the penis. J Urol 1998; 160: 67-71.
8. Levin MF et al. Self-contained, inflatable penile prosthesis: magnetic resonance appearance. Australasion Radiol. 1994; 38: 51-53.
9. Goldstein I et al. Safety and efficacy outcome of Mentor Alpha-I inflatable penile prosthesis implantation for erectile dysfunction treatment. J Urol 1997; 157: 833-839.
10. Milbank AJ, Montague DK, Angermeier KW. Mechanical failure of the American Medical Systems Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis: before and after 1993 structural modification. J Urol 2002; 167: 2502-2506.
11. Lopes TM, Martins FE, Dias JC, Vickers MA. Complications of penile prosthesis surgery. Eur Urol Update Series 1995; 4: 58.
12. Wilson SK, Cleves MA, Dertz JR. Ultrex cylinders: problems with uncontrolled lengthening (the S-shaped deformity). J Urol 1996; 155: 135.
13. Hricak H et al. Normal penile anatomy and abnormal penile conditions: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 1998; 169: 683-690.
14. Kossof J, Krane RJ, Naimark A. Inflatable penile implant for erectile dysfunction: radiologic evaluation. AJR 1981; 137: 1109-1112.
15. Wilson SK. Management of penile implant complications. In: Mulcahy JJ (ed). Diagnosis and Mangement of Male Sexual Dysfuction. Springer-Verlag: New York, 1997a, pp 529-548.
16. Lewis RW. Long-term results of penile prosthetic implants. Urol Clin N Am 1995; 22: 847.
17. Dixon CM, Hedvig H, McAnich JW. Magnetic resonance imaging of traumatic posterior urethral defects and pelvic crush injuries. J Urol 1992; 148: 1162-1165.
18. Mulcahy JJ. Use of CX cylinders in association with 700 inflatable penile prosthesis. J Urol 1988; 140: 1420-1421.
19. Fishman JJ. Complicated implantations of inflatable penile prosthesis. Urol Clin North Am 1987; 14: 217-239.
20. Shellock FG, Curtis JS. MR imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: an updated review. Radiology 1991; 180: 541-550.
21. Shellock FG, Crues JV, Sacks SA. High-field magnetic resonance imaging of penile prosthesis: in vitro evaluation of deflection forces and imaging artifacts. Book of abstracts: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1987. Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Berkley, CA, 1987; p 915.