Information theoretical approaches to chick-a-dee calls of carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis)

Journal of Comparative Psychology

Volumn 126, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 68-81

  Freeberg, Todd M ^a   Lucas, Jeffrey R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Call; Chickadee; Entropy; Information; Parid; Vocalization; Zipf

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; INFORMATION SCIENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SONGBIRD; VOCALIZATION;

ACOUSTICS; ANIMALS; INFORMATION THEORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SONGBIRDS; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 84861533456     PISSN: 07357036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024906     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Baker, M. C., & Becker, A. M. (2002). Mobbing calls of black-capped chickadees: Effects of urgency on call production. Wilson Bulletin, 114, 510-516.
2. Bartmess-LeVasseur, J., Branch, C. L., Browning, S. A., Owens, J. L., & Freeberg, T. M. (2010). Predator stimuli and calling behavior of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), tufted titmice (Baeolophus bicolor), and white-breasted nuthatches (Sitta carolinensis). Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, 64, 1187-1198.
3. Berwick, R. C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G. J. L., & Bolhuis, J. J. (2011). Songs to syntax: The linguistics of birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 113-121.
4. Bloomfield, L. L., Charrier, I., & Sturdy, C. B. (2004). Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. II: The chick-a-dee call of the mountain chickadee (Poecile gambeli). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 82, 780-793.
5. Bloomfield, L. L., Phillmore, L. S., Weisman, R. G., & Sturdy, C. B. (2005). Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. III: The chick-adee call of the Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 83, 820-833.
6. Blumstein, D. T., & Armitage, K. B. (1997). Does sociality drive the evolution of communicative complexity? A comparative test with ground-dwelling sciurid alarm calls. American Naturalist, 150, 179-200.
7. Bradbury, J. W., & Vehrencamp, S. L. (1998). Principles of animal communication. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
8. Burghardt, G. M. (1970). Defining "communication." In J. W. Johnston, Jr., D. G. Moulton, & A. Turk (Eds.), Advances in chemoreception. Vol. 1: Communication by chemical signals (pp. 5-18). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9. Cachpole, C. K., & Slater, P. J. B. (2008). Bird song: Biological themes and variations (2nd ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
10. Carazo, P., & Font, E. (2010). Putting information back into biological communication. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23, 661-669.
11. Charrier, I., Bloomfield, L. L., & Sturdy, C. B. (2004). Note types and coding in parid vocalizations. I: The chick-a-dee call of the black-capped chickadee (Poecile atricapillus). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 82, 769-779.
12. Clarke, E., Reichard, U. H., & Zuberbühler, K. (2006). The syntax and meaning of wild gibbon songs. PLoS ONE, e73. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0000073
13. Clucas, B. A., Freeberg, T. M., & Lucas, J. R. (2004). Chick-a-dee call syntax, social context, and season affect vocal responses of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis). Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, 57, 187-196.
14. Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In J. R. Krebs, & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 282-309). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
15. de Vries, H., Stevens, J. M. G., & Vervaecke, H. (2006). Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies. Animal Behaviour, 71, 585-592.
16. Dunbar, R. (1996). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Dunbar, R. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 178-190.
18. Ficken, M. S., Hailman, E. D., & Hailman, J. P. (1994). The chick-a-dee call system of the Mexican chickadee. Condor, 96, 70-82.
19. Ficken, M. S., Rusch, K. M., Taylor, S. J., & Powers, D. R. (2000). Blue-throated hummingbird song: A pinnacle of nonoscine vocalizations. Auk, 117, 120-128.
20. Freeberg, T. M. (2006). Social complexity can drive vocal complexity: Group size influences vocal information in Carolina chickadees. Psychological Science, 17, 557-561.
21. Freeberg, T. M. (2008). Complexity in the chick-a-dee call of Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis): Associations of context and signaler behavior to call structure. Auk, 125, 896-907.
22. Freeberg, T. M., & Lucas, J. R. (2002). Receivers respond differently to chick-a-dee calls varying in note composition in Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis). Animal Behaviour, 63, 837-845.
23. Freeberg, T. M., Lucas, J. R., & Clucas, B. (2003). Variation in chick-a-dee calls of a population of Carolina chickadees, Poecile carolinensis: Identity and redundancy within note types. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 2127-2136.
24. Gaddis, P. (1979). A comparative analysis of the vocal communication systems of The Carolina chickadee and the tufted titmouse (Doctoral thesis, University of Florida).
25. Gaddis, P. K. (1985). Structure and variability in the vocal repertoire of the mountain chickadee. Wilson Bulletin, 97, 30-46.
26. Gleick, J. (2011). The information: A history, a theory, a flood. New York, NY: Pantheon.
27. Haftorn, S. (1993). Ontogeny of the vocal repertoire in the willow tit Parus montanus. Ornis Scandinavica, 24, 267-289.
28. Haftorn, S. (2000). Contexts and possible functions of alarm calling in the willow tit, Parus montanus: The principle of "better safe than sorry." Behaviour, 137, 437-449.
29. Haftorn, S., & Hailman, J. P. (1997). Do the Siberian tits Parus cinctus in Scandinavia and Siberia speak the same language? Bioacoustics, 8, 223-247.
30. Hailman J. P. (1977). Optical signals: Animal communication and light. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
31. Hailman J. P. (1989). The organization of the major vocalizations in the Paridae. Wilson Bulletin, 101, 305-343.
32. Hailman, J. P. (1994). Constrained permutation in "chick-a-dee"-like calls of a black-lored tit (Parus xanthogenys). Bioacoustics, 6, 33-50.
33. Hailman, J. P. (2009). Coding and redundancy: Man-made and animalevolved signals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Hailman J. P., & Ficken, M. S. (1986). Combinatorial animal communication with computable syntax: Chick-a-dee calling qualifies as "language" by structural linguistics. Animal Behaviour, 34, 1899-1901.
35. Hailman, J. P., & Ficken, M. S. (1996). Comparative analysis of vocal repertoires, with reference to chickadees. In D. E. Kroodsma, & E. H. Miller (Eds.), Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds (pp. 136-159). Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing Associates of Cambridge University Press.
36. Hailman, J. P., Ficken, M. S., & Ficken, R. W. (1985). The "chick-a-dee" calls of Parus atricapillus: A recombinant system of animal communication compared with written English. Semiotica, 56, 191-224.
37. Hailman, J. P., Ficken, M. S., & Ficken, R. W. (1987). Constraints on the structure of combinatorial "chick-a-dee" calls. Ethology, 75, 62-80.
38. Halliday, T. (1983). Information and communication. In T. R. Halliday, & P. J. B. Slater (Eds.), Animal behaviour. Vol. 2: Communication (pp. 43-81). New York, NY: Freeman and Company.
39. Hoeschele, M., Gammon, D. E., Moscicki, M. K., & Sturdy, C. B. (2009). Note types and coding in Parid vocalizations: The chick-a-dee call of the chestnut-backed chickadee (Poecile rufuscens). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, 2088-2099.
40. Losey, G. S., Jr. (1978). Information theory and communication. In P. W. Colgan (Ed.), Quantitative ethology (pp. 43-78). New York, NY: Wiley.
41. Lucas, J. R., & Freeberg, T. M. (2007). "Information" and the chick-a-dee call: Communicating with a complex vocal system. In K. A. Otter (Ed.), Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: An integrated approach (pp. 199-213). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
42. Mahurin, E. J., & Freeberg, T. M. (2009). Chick-a-dee call variation in Carolina chickadees and recruiting flockmates to food. Behavioral Ecology, 20, 111-116.
43. Mammen, D. L., & Nowicki, S. (1981). Individual differences and withinflock convergence in chickadee calls. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 9, 179-186.
44. Mandelbrot, B. (1953). Contribution ala théorie mathématique des jeux de communication [Contributions to mathematical game theory in communication] (doctoral dissertation). Publications de l'Institut de Statistique de l'Université de Paris, 2, 1-124.
45. Marler, P. (2004). Bird calls: A cornucopia for communication. In P. Marler & H. Slabbekoorn (Eds.), Nature's music: The science of birdsong (pp. 132-177). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
46. McComb, K., & Semple, S. (2005). Coevolution of vocal communication and sociality in primates. Biology Letters, 1, 381-385.
47. McKinnon, L., Smith, P. A., Nol, E., Martin, J. L., Doyle, F. I., Abraham, K. F.,.. Bety, J. (2010). Lower predation risk for migratory birds at high latitudes. Science, 327, 326-327.
48. Miller, G. A. (1951). Language and communication. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
49. Morse D. H. (1970). Ecological aspects of some mixed-species foraging flocks of birds. Ecological Monographs, 40, 119-168.
50. Mostrom, A. M. (1993). The social organization of Carolina chickadee (Parus carolinensis) flocks in the non-breeding season (PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania).
51. Mostrom A. M., Curry, R. L., & Lohr, B. (2002). Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis). In A. Poole, & F. Gill (Eds.), The birds of North America, No. 636 (pp. 1-28). Philadelphia, PA: The Birds of North America, Inc.
52. Nolen, M. T. (2010). Multi-species mobbing assemblages: Behavioral asymmetries, vocal facilitation of social behavior, and the link of acoustic structure to function (PhD Thesis, Purdue University).
53. Nolen M. T., & Lucas, J. R. (2009). Asymmetries in mobbing behaviour and correlated intensity during predator mobbing by nuthatches, chickadees and titmice. Animal Behaviour, 77, 1137-1146.
54. Nowicki, S. (1983). Flock-specific recognition of chick-a-dee calls. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12, 317-320.
55. Nowicki, S. (1989). Vocal plasticity in captive blackcapped chickadees: The acoustic basis and rate of call convergence. Animal Behaviour, 37, 64-73.
56. Ouattara, K., Lemasson, A., & Zuberbühler, K. (2009a). Campbell's monkeys concatenate vocalizations into context-specific call sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 22026-22031.
57. Ouattara, K., Lemasson, A., & Zuberbühler, K. (2009b). Campbell's monkeys use affixation to alter call meaning. Public Library of Science One, 4, 1-7, e7808. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007808
58. Owens, J. L., & Freeberg, T. M. (2007). Variation in chick-a-dee calls of tufted titmice, Baeolophus bicolor: Note type and individual distinctiveness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 1216-1226.
59. Owings, D. H., Beecher, M. D., & Thompson, N. S. (Eds.). (1997). Perspectives in ethology, Vol. 12: Communication. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
60. Owings, D. H., & Morton, E. S. (1998). Animal vocal communication: A new approach. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
61. Pierce, J. R. (1980). An introduction to information theory: Symbols, signals, and noise (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Dover.
62. Rendall D., Owren, M. J., & Ryan, M. J. (2009). What do animal signals mean? Animal Behaviour, 78, 233-240.
63. Schel, A. M., Candiotti, A., & Zuberbühler, K. (2010). Predator-deterring alarm call sequences in Guereza colobus monkeys are meaningful to conspecifics. Animal Behaviour, 80, 799-808.
64. Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., Bergman, T., Fischer, J., Zuberbühler, K., & Hammerschmidt, K. (2010). The central importance of information in studies of animal communication. Animal Behaviour, 80, 3-8.
65. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
66. Smith, S. M. (1991). The Black-capped Chickadee: Behavioral ecology and natural history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
67. Smith, S. M. (1993). Black-capped chickadee (Parus atricapillus). In A. Poole, P. Stettenheim, & F. Gill (Eds.) The birds of North America, No. 39 (pp. 1-20). Philadelphia, PA: The Birds of North America, Inc.
68. Smith, S. T. (1972). Communication and other social behavior in Parus carolinensis. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, 11, 1-125.
69. Smith, W. J. (1977). The behavior of communicating: An ethological approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Soard, C., & Ritchison, G. (2009). "Chick-a-dee" calls of Carolina chickadees convey information about degree of threat posed by avian predators. Animal Behaviour, 78, 1447-1453.
71. Sturdy, C. B., Bloomfield, L. L., Charrier, I., & Lee, T. T-Y. (2007). Chickadee vocal production and perception: An integrative approach to understanding acoustic communication. In K. A. Otter (Ed.), Ecology and behavior of chickadees and titmice: An integrated approach (pp. 153-166). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
72. Sturdy, C. B., Phillmore, L. S., & Weisman, R. G. (2000). Call-note discriminations in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 114, 357-364.
73. Templeton, C. N., Greene, E., & Davis, K. (2005). Allometry of alarm calls: Black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science, 308, 1934-1937.
74. Wiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Wiley, R. H. (1983). The evolution of communication: Information and manipulation. In T. R. Halliday, & P. J. B. Slater (Eds.), Animal behaviour. Vol. 2: Communication (pp. 156-189). New York, NY: Freeman and Company.
76. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
77. Zipf G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
78. Zipf G. K. (1942a). The unity of nature, least-action, and natural social science. Sociometry, 5, 48-62.
79. Zipf, G. K. (1942b). Children's speech. Science, 96, 344-345.
80. Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
81. Zuberbühler K. (2002). A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication. Animal Behaviour, 63, 293-299.