Clinical outcomes after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty

Orthopedics

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2012, Pages

  Xie, Chunming ^a   Liu, Kai ^b   Xiao, Luxin ^a   Tang, Rong ^b  

^a LESHAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Leshan People's Hospital   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION AND FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE FUNCTION; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THROMBOSIS; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT; WOUND INFECTION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84861516733     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120426-17     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Victor J, Hoste D. Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (428):131-139. (Pubitemid 39506164)
2. Ma HM, Lu YC, Ho FY, Huang CH. Long-term results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5):580-584. (Pubitemid 41073470)
3. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(7):1487-1497. (Pubitemid 40917748)
4. Choong PF, Dowsey MM, Stoney JD. Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty [published online ahead of print May 19, 2008]. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(4):560-569.
5. Ritter MA, Faris PM, Keating EM, Meding JB. Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; (299):153-156. (Pubitemid 24051713)
6. Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Alignment and orientation of the components in total knee replacement with and without navigation support: a prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(4):471-476.
7. Weng YJ, Hsu RW, Hsu WH. Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty [published online ahead of print June 4, 2008]. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(5):668-673.
8. Rosenberger RE, Hoser C, Quirbach S, Attal R, Hennerbichler A, Fink C. Improved accuracy of component alignment with the implementation of image-free navigation in total knee arthroplasty [published online ahead of print December 22, 2007]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16(3):249-257.
9. Hakki S, Coleman S, Saleh K, Bilotta VJ, Hakki A. Navigational predictors in determining the necessity for collateral ligament release in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(9):1178-1182.
10. Lee DH, Park JH, Song DI, Padhy D, Jeong WK, Han SB. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in TKA: comparison between navigation-assisted gap balancing and conventional measured resection. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18(3):381-387.
11. Stulberg SD, Loan P, Sarin V. Computer-assisted navigation in total knee replacement: results of an initial experience in thirty-five patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(suppl 2):90-98. (Pubitemid 35168340)
12. Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (428):26-34. (Pubitemid 39506147)
13. Takasaki M, Matsuda S, Fukagawa S, Mitsuyasu H, Miura H, Iwamoto Y. Accuracy of image-free navigation for severely deformed knees [published online ahead of print October 17, 2009]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18(6):763-768.
14. Kamat YD, Aurakzai KM, Adhikari AR, Matthews D, Kalairajah Y, Field RE. Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up [published online ahead of print November 26, 2008]? Int Orthop. 2009; 33(6):1567-1570.
15. Yau WP, Chiu KY, Zuo JL, Tang WM, Ng TP. Computer navigation did not improve alignment in a lower-volume total knee practice [published online ahead of print February 8, 2008]. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(4):935-945.
16. Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, Tselentakis G. Navigation knee replacement [published online ahead of print October 29, 2008]. Int Orthop. 2009; 33(1):7-10.
17. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration Web site. http://www.cochrane.org/training/cochrane-handbook.
18. Chauhan SK, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Beaver RJ. Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(3):372-377. (Pubitemid 38559489)
19. Decking R, Markmann Y, Fuchs J, Puhl W, Scharf HP. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(3):282-288. (Pubitemid 40460792)
20. Decking R, Markmann Y, Mattes T, Puhl W, Scharf HP. On the outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007; 74(3):171-174. (Pubitemid 47049431)
21. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(2):236-243. (Pubitemid 46214339)
22. Dutton AQ, Yeo SJ, Yang KY, Lo NN, Chia KU, Chong HC. Computer-assisted minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with standard total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(1):2-9.
23. Lützner J, Krummenauer F, Wolf C, Günther KP, Kirschner S. Computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement: a comparative, prospective, randomised study with radiological and CT evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(8):1039-1044.
24. Lützner J, Günther KP, Kirschner S. Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study [published online ahead of print May 5, 2010]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18(10):1339-1344.
25. Yang JH, Yoon JR, Pandher DS, Oh KJ. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of contemporary 3 techniques of TKA. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(10 suppl):76-81. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20100510-59
26. Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Lüring C, Zurakowski D, Grifka J. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer- assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(5):682-687. (Pubitemid 39077216)
27. Chotanaphuti T, Ongnamthip P, Teeraleekul K, Kraturerk C. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2008; 91(9):1382-1388.
28. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C, Ragone V. Mini-incision versus mini-incision and computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement: a radiological prospective randomised study [published online ahead of print September 19, 2007]. Knee. 2007; 14(6):443-447. (Pubitemid 350137757)
29. Hinarejos P, Corrales M, Matamalas A, Bisbe E, Cáceres E. Computer-assisted surgery can reduce blood loss after total knee arthroplasty [published online ahead of print December 16, 2008]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17(4):356-360.
30. Lüring C, Beckmann J, Haiböck P, Perlick L, Grifka J, Tingart M. Minimal invasive and computer assisted total knee replacement compared with the conventional technique: a prospective, randomised trial [published online ahead of print July 17, 2008]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16(10):928-934.
31. Martin A, Wohlgenannt O, Prenn M, Oelsch C, von Strempel A. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 460:178-184. (Pubitemid 47056495)
32. Martin A, Sheinkop MB, Langhenry MM, Oelsch C, Widemschek M, von Strempel A. Accuracy of side-cutting implantation instruments for total knee arthroplasty [published online ahead of print January 9, 2009]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17(4):374-381.
33. Mullaji A, Kanna R, Marawar S, Kohli A, Sharma A. Comparison of limb and component alignment using computer-assisted navigation versus image intensifier-guided conventional total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-surgeon study of 467 knees. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(7):953-959. (Pubitemid 47498928)
34. Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(6):830-835. (Pubitemid 36986842)
35. Spencer JM, Chauhan SK, Sloan K, Taylor A, Beaver RJ. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89(4):477-480. (Pubitemid 46851126)
36. Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, Banel D, Fahrbach K. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(8):1097-1106. (Pubitemid 350216994)
37. Brin YS, Nikolaou VS, Joseph L, Zukor DJ, Antoniou J. Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies [published online ahead of print April 8, 2010]. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(3):331-339.