Do public subsidies affect the performance of new technologybased firms? The importance of evaluation schemes and agency goals

Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 97-111

  Grilli, Luca ^a   Murtinu, Samuele ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRIAL POLICY; POLICY ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SUBSIDY SYSTEM;

EID: 84861501437     PISSN: 08109028     EISSN: 14701030     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08109028.2012.676836     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Abernathy, W. 1978. The Productivity Dilemma, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
2. Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. 2003. Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research: An Interdisciplinary Survey and Introduction, New York: Springer.
3. Acs, Z., Morck, R. and Yeung, B. 1999. "Productivity growth and firm size distribution". In Entrepreneurship, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, and the Macroeconomy, Edited by: Acs, Z., Carlsson, B. and Karlsson, C. 367-96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P. and Prantl, S. 2009. The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1): 20-32.
5. Aitken, B. and Harrison, A. 1999. Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American Economic Review, 89(3): 605-18.
6. Arrow, K. 1962. "Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention". In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Edited by: Nelson, R. 609-25. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Audretsch, D. 1995. Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Beason, R. and Weinstein, D. 1996. Growth, economies of scale, and targeting in Japan (1955-1990). Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(2): 286-95.
9. Berger, A. and Udell, G. 1998. The economics of small business finance. the roles of private equity and debt markets in the financial growth cycle. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(6-8): 613-73.
10. Bergström, F. 2000. Capital subsidies and the performance of firms. Small Business Economics, 14(3): 183-93.
11. Bérubé, C. and Mohnen, P. 2009. Are firms that receive R&D subsidies more innovative?. Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(1): 206-25.
12. Bhattacharya, S. and Ritter, J. 1983. Innovation and communication: signalling with partial disclosure. Review of Economic Studies, 50(2): 331-46.
13. Blalock, G. and Gertler, P. 2007. Welfare gains from foreign direct investment through technology transfer to local suppliers. Journal of International Economics, 74(2): 402-21.
14. Blanes, J. and Busom, I. 2004. Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 33(10): 1459-76.
15. Blundell, R. and Bond, S. 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1): 115-43.
16. Bond, S. 2002. Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2): 141-62.
17. Bottazzi, L. and Da Rin, M. 2002. Venture capital in Europe and the financing of innovative companies. Economic Policy, 17(34): 229-69.
18. Burns, T. and Stalker, G. 1961. The Management of Innovation, London: Tavistock Publishing.
19. Carlsson, B. 1989. Flexibility and the theory of the firm. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 7(2): 179-203.
20. Carpenter, R. and Petersen, B. 2002. Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. Economic Journal, 112(477): F54-72.
21. Castellani, D. and Zanfei, A. 2006. Multinational Firms, Innovation and Productivity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
22. Cingano, F. and Schivardi, F. 2004. Identifying the sources of local productivity growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(4): 720-42.
23. Colombo, M., Grilli, L. and Murtinu, S. 2011a. R&D subsidies and the performance of high-tech start-ups. Economics Letters, 112(1): 97-9.
24. Colombo, M., Giannangeli, S. and Grilli, L. (2011b) Public Subsidies and the Employment Growth of High-Tech Start-Ups: Assessing the Impact of Selective and Automatic Support Schemes, Politecnico di Milano, mimeo.
25. Colombo, M., Grilli, L., Murtinu, S., Piscitello, L. and Piva, E. 2009. Effects of international R&D alliances on performance of high-tech start-ups: a longitudinal analysis. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3(4): 346-68.
26. Colombo, M., Grilli, L. and Piva, E. 2006. In search of complementary assets: the determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 35(8): 1166-99.
27. Croce, A., Martí, J. and Murtinu, S. (2010) The Impact of Venture Capital on the Productivity of European High-Tech Firms: Screening or Value Added Effect?, SSRN Working Paper Series, available from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1705225 [accessed March 2012].
28. David, P., Hall, B. and Toole, A. 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5): 497-529.
29. Denis, D. 2004. Entrepreneurial finance. an overview of the issues and evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(2): 301-26.
30. Driffield, N., Du, J. and Girma, S. 2008. Optimal geographic diversification and firm performance. evidence from the U.K. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30(2): 145-54.
31. Eberhardt, M. and Helmers, C. (2010) Untested Assumptions and Data Slicing: A Critical Review of Firm-Level Production Function Estimators, Department of Economics Discussion Paper 513, University of Oxford, available from http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/Research/wp/pdf/paper513.pdf [accessed March 2012].
32. European Commission (2010) Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, available from http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/ [accessed March 2012].
33. European Council (2008) European Economic Recovery Plan, available from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication13504_en.pdf [accessed March 2012].
34. Feldman, M. and Kelley, M. 2006. The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior. Research Policy, 35(10): 1509-21.
35. Fernald, J. 1999. Roads to prosperity? Assessing the link between public capital and productivity. American Economic Review, 89(3): 619-38.
36. Freel, M. 1999. The financing of small firm product innovation in the UK. Technovation, 19(12): 707-19.
37. Girma, S., Görg, H. and Strobl, E. 2007. The effect of government grants on plant level productivity. Economics Letters, 94(3): 439-44.
38. Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. (1998) The Determinants of Corporate Venture Capital Success: Organizational Structure, Incentives, and Complementarities, NBER working paper 6725, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge MA, available from http://www.nber.org/papers/w6725 [accessed March 2012].
39. Gompers, P. and Lerner, J. 2001. The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2): 145-68.
40. Griliches, Z. and Mairesse, J. 1998. "Production functions: the search for identification". In Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century, Edited by: Strøm, S. 169-203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Grilli, L. and Murtinu, S. 2011. "Econometric evaluation of public policies for science and innovation: a brief guide to practice". In Policies for Science and Innovation: Design and Evaluation, Edited by: Colombo, M., Grilli, L., Piscitello, L. and Rossi Lamastra, C. 103-28. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
42. Hall, B. 2002. The financing of research and development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1): 35-51.
43. Hall, B. and Mairesse, J. 1995. Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics, 65(1): 263-93.
44. Harris, R. and Robinson, C. 2004. Industrial policy in Great Britain and its effect on total factor productivity in manufacturing plants, 1990-1998. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(4): 528-43.
45. Hart, A. 1942. "Risk, uncertainty and the unprofitability of compounding probabilities". In Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics, Edited by: Schultz, H., Lange, O. and McIntyre, F. 110-18. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. Heskett, J. (1987) Establishing Strategic Direction: Aligning Elements of Strategy, Harvard Business School Note #9-388-033, Cambridge MA.
47. Holtz-Eakin, D. 1994. Public sector capital and the productivity puzzle. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(1): 12-21.
48. Hussinger, K. 2008. R&D and subsidies at the firm level: an application of parametric and semiparametric two-step selection models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 23(6): 729-47.
49. Irwin, D. and Klenow, P. 1996. High-tech R&D subsidies: estimating the effects of Sematech. Journal of International Economics, 40(3-4): 323-44.
50. Javorcik, B. 2004. Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3): 605-27.
51. Jones, R. and Ostroy, J. 1984. Flexibility and uncertainty. Review of Economics Studies, 51(1): 13-32.
52. Kaplan, S. and Strömberg, P. 2001. Venture capitalists as principals: contracting, screening and monitoring. American Economic Review, 91(2): 426-30.
53. Kleer, R. 2010. Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors. Research Policy, 39(10): 1361-74.
54. Klein, B. 1984. Prices, Wages and Business Cycles: A Dynamic Theory, New York: Pergamon.
55. Klette, T., Møen, J. and Griliches, Z. 2000. Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy, 29(4-5): 471-95.
56. Lach, S. 2002. Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(4): 369-90.
57. Lerner, J. 1999. The government as venture capitalist: the long-run impact of the SBIR program. Journal of Business, 72(3): 285-318.
58. Lerner, J. 2002. When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: the design of effective 'public venture capital' programmes. Economic Journal, 112(477): F73-84.
59. Levinsohn, J. and Petrin, A. 2003. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2): 317-42.
60. Lockett, A., Murray, G. and Wright, M. 2002. Do UK venture capitalists still have a bias against investments in new technology firms?. Research Policy, 31(6): 1009-30.
61. Marschack, T. and Nelson, R. (1962) 'Flexibility, uncertainty, and economic theory', Metroeconomica, 14, 1-2-3, pp. 42-58.
62. Narayanan, V., Pinches, G., Kelm, K. and Lander, D. 2000. The influence of voluntarily disclosed qualitative information. Strategic Management Journal, 21(7): 707-22.
63. Olley, G. and Pakes, A. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6): 1263-97.
64. Pavcnik, N. 2002. Trade liberalization, exit, and productivity improvements: evidence from Chilean plants. Review of Economic Studies, 69(1): 245-76.
65. Rooney, D. and Mandeville, T. 1998. The knowing nation: a framework for public policy in a knowledge economy. Prometheus, 16(4): 455-69.
66. Sahlman, W. 1990. The structure and governance of venture-capital organizations. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2): 473-21.
67. Semykina, A. and Wooldridge, J. 2010. Estimating panel data models in the presence of endogeneity and selection. Journal of Econometrics, 157(2): 375-80.
68. Sørensen, A., Kongsted, H. and Marcusson, M. 2003. R&D, public innovation policy, and productivity: the case of Danish manufacturing. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12(2): 163-78.
69. Stigler, G. 1939. Production and distribution in the short run. Journal of Political Economy, 47(3): 305-27.
70. Takalo, T. and Tanayama, T. 2010. Adverse selection and financing of innovation: is there a need for R&D subsidies?. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1): 16-41.
71. Ueda, M. 2004. Banks versus venture capital: project evaluation, screening, and expropriation. Journal of Finance, 59(2): 601-21.
72. Väänänen, L. (2003) Does Public Funding Have a Halo Effect? Evidence from Finnish SMEs, Discussion Paper 853, Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, Helsinki, available from http://www.etla.fi/files/675_dp853.pdf [accessed March 2012].
73. van Biesebroeck, J. 2007. Robustness of productivity estimates. Journal of Industrial Economics, 55(3): 529-69.
74. Wallsten, S. 2000. The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of small business innovation research program. RAND Journal of Economics, 31(1): 82-100.
75. Westhead, P. and Storey, D. 1997. Financial constraints on the growth of high-technology small firms in the United Kingdom. Applied Financial Economics, 7(2): 197-201.
76. Wren, C. and Storey, D. 2002. Evaluating the effect of soft business support upon small firm performance. Oxford Economic Papers, 54(2): 334-65.