Rising ozone concentrations decrease soybean evapotranspiration and water use efficiency whilst increasing canopy temperature

New Phytologist

Volumn 195, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 164-171

  VanLoocke, Andy ^a   Betzelberger, Amy M ^a   Ainsworth, Elizabeth A ^a,b   Bernacchi, Carl J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Evapotranspiration; Free air concentration enrichment (FACE); Surface energy balance; Tropospheric ozone; Vegetation climate interactions; Water use efficiency (WUE)

Indexed keywords

OZONE; WATER;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); CULTIVAR; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENERGY BALANCE; ENERGY FLUX; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HEAT FLUX; HYDROLOGICAL REGIME; NET RADIATION; OZONE; POLLUTION EFFECT; REGIONAL CLIMATE; SOYBEAN; TEMPERATURE PROFILE; TROPOSPHERE; WATER USE EFFICIENCY; WATER VAPOR; YIELD RESPONSE;

ARTICLE; CLIMATE; DRUG EFFECT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SEASON; SOIL; SOYBEAN; TEMPERATURE; UNITED STATES;

CLIMATE; ILLINOIS; OZONE; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; SEASONS; SOIL; SOYBEANS; TEMPERATURE; WATER;

GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 84861482346     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04152.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ainsworth EA. 2008. Rice production in a changing climate: a meta-analysis of responses to elevated carbon dioxide and elevated ozone concentration. Global Change Biology 14: 1642-1650.
2. Ainsworth EA, Yendrek CR, Sitch S, Collins WJ, Emberson LD. 2012. The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change. Annual Review of Plant Biology. doi:.
3. Andersen CP. 2003. Source-sink balance and carbon allocation below ground in plants exposed to ozone. New Phytologist 157: 213-228.
4. Bergmann E, Bender J, Weigel HJ. 1999. Ozone threshold doses and exposure-response relationships for the development of ozone injury symptoms in wild plant species. New Phytologist 144: 423-435.
5. 2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiology 143: 134-144.
6. 2 and ozone concentrations for 3years under fully open-air field conditions. Plant, Cell & Environment 29: 2077-2090.
7. Bernacchi CJ, Leakey ADB, Kimball BA, Ort DR. 2011. Growth of soybean at midcentury tropospheric ozone concentrations decreases canopy evapotranspiration and soil water depletion. Environmental Pollution 159: 1464-1472.
8. 2] enrichment (FACE) stimulates photosynthesis while decreasing invivo Rubisco capacity. Planta 220: 434-446.
9. Berry JA, Beerling DJ, Franks PJ. 2010. Stomata: key players in the earth system, past and present. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 13: 232-239.
10. Betzelberger AM, Gillespie KM, Mcgrath JM, Koester RP, Nelson RL, Ainsworth EA. 2010. Effects of chronic elevated ozone concentration on antioxidant capacity, photosynthesis and seed yield of 10 soybean cultivars. Plant, Cell & Environment 33: 1569-1581.
11. Blum U, Tingey DT. 1977. A study of the potential ways in which ozone could reduce root growth and nodulation of soybean. Atmospheric Environment 11: 737-739.
12. Elagoz V, Manning WJ. 2005. Responses of sensitive and tolerant bush beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to ozone in open-top chambers are influenced by phenotypic differences, morphological characteristics, and the chamber environment. Environmental Pollution 136: 371-383.
13. 3) pollution on the yields of rice and winter wheat in the Yangtze River Delta. Journal of Environmental Sciences-Amsterdam 15: 360-362.
14. Feng Z, Pang J, Kobayashi K, Zhu J, Ort DR. 2010. Differential responses in two varieties of winter wheat to elevated ozone concentration under fully open-air field conditions. Global Change Biology 17: 580-591.
15. Fiscus EL, Booker FL, Burkey KO. 2005. Crop responses to ozone: uptake, modes of action, carbon assimilation and partitioning. Plant, Cell & Environment 28: 997-1011.
16. Fiscus EL, Booker FL, Sadok W, Burkey KO. 2012. Influence of atmospheric vapour pressure deficit on ozone responses of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Journal of Experimental Biology. doi:.
17. Fishman J, Creilson JK, Parker PA, Ainsworth EA, Vining GG, Szarka J, Booker FL, Xu X. 2010. An investigation of widespread ozone damage to the soybean crop in the upper Midwest determined from ground-based and satellite measurements. Atmospheric Environment 44: 2248-2256.
18. Fowler D. 2008. Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications. London, UK: The Royal Society.
19. Fowler D, Cape JN, Coyle M, Flechard C, Kuylenstierna J, Hicks K, Derwent D, Johnson C, Stevenson D. 1999. The global exposure of forests to air pollutants. Water, Air & Soil Pollution 116: 5-32.
20. Georgescu M, Lobell DB, Field CB. 2011. Direct climate effects of perennial bioenergy crops in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108: 4307-4312.
21. Hickman G, VanLoocke A, Dohleman FG, Bernacchi CJ. 2010. A comparison of canopy evapotranspiration for maize and two perennial grass species identified as potential bioenergy crops. Global Change Biology - Bioenergy, 2: 157-168.
22. Huband NDS, Monteith JL. 1986. Radiative surface-temperature and energy-balance of a wheat canopy. 2. Estimating fluxes of sensible and latent-heat. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 36: 107-116.
23. Jackson RD, Moran MS, Gay LW, Raymond LH. 1987. Evaluating evaporation from field crops using airborne radiometry and ground-based meteorological data. Irrigation Science 8: 81-90.
24. Karlsson PE, Pleijel H, Belhaj M, Danielsson H, Dahlin B, Andersson M, Hansson M, Munthe J, Grennfelt P. 2005. Economic assessment of the negative impacts of ozone on crop yields and forest production. A case study of the estate Ostads Sateri in southwestern Sweden. Ambio 34: 32-40.
25. 2 enrichment and soil nitrogen effects on energy balance and evapotranspiration of wheat. Water Resources Research 35: 1179-1190.
26. 2 enrichment on energy-balance and evapotranspiration of cotton. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 70: 259-278.
27. 2 enrichment. Global Change Biology 1: 429-442.
28. Mauzerall DL, Wang X. 2001. Protecting agricultural crops from the effects of tropospheric ozone exposure: reconciling Science and Standard Setting in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 26: 237-268.
29. Mead R, Curnow RN. 1983. Statistical methods in agriculture and experimental biology. London, UK and New York, NY, USA: Chapman and Hall.
30. Meyers TP, Hollinger SE. 2004. An assessment of storage terms in the surface energy balance of maize and soybean. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 125: 105-115.
31. 2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: the POPFACE fumigation system. New Phytologist 150: 465-476.
32. Morgan PB, Ainsworth EA, Long SP. 2003. How does elevated ozone impact soybean? A meta-analysis of photosynthesis, growth and yield. Plant, Cell & Environment 26: 1317-1328.
33. Morgan PB, Bernacchi CJ, Ort DR, Long SP. 2004. An invivo analysis of the effect of season-long open-air elevation of ozone to anticipated 2050 levels on photosynthesis in soybean. Plant Physiology 135: 2348-2357.
34. 2] elevation. Global Change Biology 11: 1856-1865.
35. Morgan PB, Mies TA, Bollero GA, Nelson RL, Long SP. 2006. Season-long elevation of ozone concentration to projected 2050 levels under fully open-air conditions substantially decreases the growth and production of soybean. New Phytologist 170: 333-343.
36. Sellers PJ, Dickinson RE, Randall DA, Betts AK, Hall FG, Berry JA, Collatz GJ, Denning AS, Mooney HA, Nobre CA et al. 1997. Modeling the exchanges of energy, water, and carbon between continents and the atmosphere. Science 275: 502-509.
37. Sitch S, Cox PM, Collins WJ, Huntingford C. 2007. Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land carbon sink. Nature 448: 791.
38. Timonen U, Huttunen S, Manninen S. 2004. Ozone sensitivity of wild field layer plant species of northern Europe. A review. Plant Ecology 172: 27-39.
39. 2 enrichment effects on the energy balance and evapotranspiration of sorghum. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 124: 63-79.
40. US EPA. 2006. Air quality criteria and related photochemical oxidants. Washington, DC, USA: US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/600/R-05/004aFcf, 2006.
41. Van Dingenen R, Dentener FJ, Raes F, Krol MC, Emberson L, Cofala J. 2009. The global impact of ozone on agricultural crop yields under current and future air quality legislation. Atmospheric Environment 43: 604-618.
42. VanLoocke A, Bernacchi CJ, Twine TE. 2010. The impacts of Miscanthus×giganteus production on the Midwest US hydrologic cycle. Global Change Biology - Bioenergy 2: 180-191.
43. Wang X, Manning W, Feng Z, Zhu Y. 2007. Ground-level ozone in China: distribution and effects on crop yields. Environmental Pollution 147: 394-400.
44. Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 2010. Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: new insights from cell to plant to community. Plant Cell & Environment 33: 510-525.