Habitat change and the scale of habitat selection: Shifting gradients used by coexisting Arctic rodents

Oikos

Volumn 121, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 975-984

  Morris, Douglas W ^a   Dupuch, Angélique ^a,b  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; COEXISTENCE; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; FITNESS; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT TYPE; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RODENT;

ARCTIC;

DICROSTONYX; RODENTIA;

EID: 84861482092     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20492.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Aldridge C. L. and Boyce M. S. 2008. Accounting for fitness: combining survival and selection when assessing wildlife-habitat relationships. - Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54: 389-419.
2. Ale S. B. et al. 2011. Habitat selection and the scale of ghostly coexistence among Arctic rodents. - Oikos 120: 1191-1200.
3. Anisimov O. A. et al. 2007. Polar regions (Arctic and Antarctic). - In: Parry M. L. et al. (eds), Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contrib. Working grp II to the 4th Assess. Rep. of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 653-685.
4. Bates D. et al. 2011. lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package ver. 0.999375-39.
5. Bellier E. et al. 2010. Modelling habitat selection at multiple scales with multivariate geostatistics: an application to seabirds in open sea. - Oikos 199: 988-999.
6. Bhatt U. S. et al. 2010. Circumpolar Arctic tundra vegetation change is linked to sea ice decline. - Earth Interact. 14: 1-20.
7. Brown J. S. 1998. Game theory and habitat choice. - In: Dugatkin L. A. and Reeve H. K. (eds), Game theory and animal behaviour. Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 188-220.
8. Brown J. S. and Pavlovic N. B. 1992. Evolution in heterogeneous environments: effects of migration on habitat specialization. - Evol. Ecol. 6: 360-382.
9. Chylek P. et al. 2009. Arctic air temperature change amplification and the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation. - Geophys. Res. Lett. 36: L14801, doi: 10.1029/2009GL038777.
10. Ciarniello L. M. et al. 2007. Grizzly bear habitat is scale dependent. - Ecol. Appl. 17: 1424-1440.
11. Cohen D. 2006. Modeling the evolutionary and ecological consequences of selection and adaptation in heterogeneous environments. - Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 52: 467-484.
12. Cressman R. and Krivan V. 2010. The ideal free distribution as an evolutionarily stable state in density-dependent population games. - Oikos 119: 1231-1242.
13. Emlen J. M. et al. 2006. Interaction assessment: a modeling tool for predicting population dynamics from field data. - Ecol. Modell. 192: 557-570.
14. Fortin D. et al. 2008. Adaptive habitat selection and the evolution of specialists and generalists in heterogeneous environments. - Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54: 311-328.
15. Fretwell S. D. and Lucas H. L. Jr. 1969. On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. - Acta Biotheor. 4: 16-36.
16. Gaillard J.-M. et al. 2010. Habitat-performance relationships: finding the right metric at a given spatial scale. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365: 2255-2265.
17. Gomulkiewicz R. et al. 2010. Genetics, adaptation, and invasion in harsh environments. - Evol. Appl. 3: 97-108.
18. Guisan A. and Zimmerman N. E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. - Ecol. Modell. 135: 147-186.
19. Guisan A. and Thuiller W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 993-1009.
20. Hairston N. G. Jr. et al. 2005. Rapid evolution and the convergence of ecological and evolutionary time. - Ecol. Lett. 8: 1114-1127.
21. Holt R. D. 1984. Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and the coexistence of prey species. - Am. Nat. 124: 377-406.
22. Holt R. D. 2003. On the evolutionary ecology of species' ranges. - Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 159-178.
23. Holt R. D. and Gaines M. S. 1992. Analysis of adaptation in heterogeneous landscapes: implications for the evolution of fundamental niches. - Evol. Ecol. 6: 433-447.
24. Holt R. D. et al. 2004. Allee effects, immigration, and the evolution of species niches. - Am. Nat. 163: 253-263.
25. Johnson D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. - Ecology 61: 65-71.
26. Jorgensen E. E. 2004. Small mammal use of microhabitat reviewed. - J. Mamm. 85: 531-539.
27. Kawecki T. J. and Holt R. D. 2002. Evolutionary consequences of asymmetric dispersal rates. - Am. Nat. 160: 333-347.
28. Kimbrell T. and Holt R. D. 2007. Canalization breakdown and evolution in a source-sink system. - Am. Nat. 169: 370-382.
29. Klady R. A. et al. 2011. Changes in high arctic tundra plant reproduction in response to long-term experimental warming. - Global Change Biol. 17: 1611-1624.
30. Kotliar N. and Wiens J. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. - Oikos 59: 253-260.
31. Krebs C. J. 1964. The lemming cycle at Baker Lake, Northwest Territories, during 1959-1962. - Arctic Inst. N. Am. Tech. Pap. 15: 1-104.
32. Liu J. et al. (eds) 2011. Sources, sinks and sustainability. Cambridge Univ. Press.
33. Manly B. F. et al. 2002. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. - Kluwer.
34. Mayor S. J. et al. 2007. Spectrum of selection: new approaches to detecting the scale-dependent response to habitat. - Ecology 88: 1634-1640.
35. McLoughlin P. D. et al. 2010. Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions. - J. Anim. Ecol. 79: 4-12.
36. Morris D. W. 1987a. Ecological scale and habitat use. - Ecology 68: 362-369.
37. Morris D. W. 1987b. Spatial scale and the cost of density- dependent habitat selection. - Evol. Ecol. 1: 379-388.
38. Morris D. W. 1988. Habitat-dependent population regulation and community structure. - Evol. Ecol. 2: 253-269.
39. Morris D. W. 1992. Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes. - Evol. Ecol. 6: 412-432.
40. Morris D. W. 2003. Toward an ecological synthesis: a case for habitat selection. - Oecologia 136: 1-13.
41. Morris D. W. 2011. Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process. - Proc. R. Soc. B 278: 2401-2411.
42. Morris D. W. et al. 2000. Measuring the ghost of competition: insights from density-dependent habitat selection on the coexistence and dynamics of lemmings. - Evol. Ecol. Res. 2: 41-67.
43. Morris D. W. et al. 2011. Forecasting ecological and evolutionary strategies to global change: an example from habitat selection by lemmings. - Global Change Biol. 17: 1266-1276.
44. Oatway M. L. and Morris D. W. 2007. Do animals select habitat at small or large scales? An experiment with meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). - Can. J. Zool. 85: 479-487.
45. Orians G. H. and Wittenberger J. F. 1991. Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection. - Am. Nat. 137: S29-S49.
46. Pelletier F. et al. 2009. Eco-evolutionary dynamics. - Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364: 1483-1489.
47. Pitelka F. A. and Batzli G. O. 1993. Distribution, abundance and habitat use by lemmings on the north slope of Alaska. - In: Stenseth N. C. and Ims R. A. (eds), The biology of lemmings. Academic Press, pp. 213-236.
48. Pulliam H. R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. - Am. Nat. 132: 652-661.
49. Réale D. et al. 2003. Genetic and plastic responses of a northern mammal to climate change. - Proc. R. Soc. B 270: 591-596.
50. Rodgers A. R. and Lewis M. C. 1986. Diet selection in Arctic lemmings (Lemmus sibiricus and Dicrostonyx groenlandicus): demography, home range, and habitat use. - Can. J. Zool. 64: 2717-2727.
51. Rosenzweig M. L. 1981. A theory of habitat selection. - Ecology 62: 327-335.
52. Schaefer J. A. and Messier F. 1995. Habitat selection as a hierarchy: the spatial scales of winter foraging by muskoxen. - Ecography 19: 333-344.
53. Schoener T. W. 2011. The newest synthesis: understanding the interplay of evolutionary and ecological dynamics. - Science 331: 426-429.
54. Stamps J. A. et al. 2009a. How different types of natal experience affect habitat preference. - Am. Nat. 174: 623-630.
55. Stamps J. A. et al. 2009b. Effects of survival on the attractiveness of cues to natal dispersers. - Am. Nat. 173: 41-46.
56. Sturm M. et al. 2001. Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. - Nature 411: 546-547.
57. Tape K. et al. 2006. The evidence for shrub expansion in northern Alaska and the Pan-Arctic. - Global Change Biol. 12: 686-702.
58. Vincent T. L. and Brown J. S. 2005. Evolutionary game theory, natural selection, and Darwinian dynamics. - Cambridge Univ. Press.