In vivo evaluation of stent patency by 64-slice multidetector CT coronary angiography: Shall we do it or not?

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 651-658

  Zhang, Jiayin ^a   Li, Minghua ^a   Lu, Zhigang ^a   Hang, Jingyu ^a   Pan, Jingwei ^a   Sun, Leiqing ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Angiography; Computed tomography; Coronary artery disease; Stent

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IN VIVO STUDY; IN-STENT RESTENOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CHINA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 84861479280     PISSN: 15695794     EISSN: 15730743     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10554-011-9842-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sousa JE, Serruys PW, Costa MA (2003) New frontiers in cardiology: drug-eluting stents: Part I. Circulation 107:2274-2279 (Pubitemid 36547225)
2. Sousa JE, Serruys PW, Costa MA (2003) New frontiers in cardiology: drug-eluting stents: Part II. Circulation 107:2283-2289
3. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ et al (2003) Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 349:1315-1323 (Pubitemid 37186209)
4. Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA et al (2004) A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 350:221-231 (Pubitemid 38067635)
5. De Bono D, The Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society, Royal College of Physicians of London (1993) Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterisation: results from 34,041 patients in the United Kingdom confidential enquiry into cardiac catheter complications. Br Heart J 70:297-300 (Pubitemid 23276249)
6. Young N, Chi KK, Ajaka J et al (2002) Complications with outpatient angiography and interventional procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 25:123-126 (Pubitemid 36919658)
7. Stein PD, Yaekoub AY, Matta F et al (2008) 64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med 121:715-725
8. Daniel BM, Daniel SB, Matthew JB et al (2010) ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SAIP/ SCAI/SCCT 2010 Expert consensus document on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation 121:2509-2543
9. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M et al (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 70:564-571
10. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5-40
11. Tanabe K, Serruys PW, Grube E et al (2003) TAXUS III Trial: in-stent restenosis treated with stent-based delivery of paclitaxel incorporated in a slow-release polymer formulation. Circulation 107:559-564 (Pubitemid 36176804)
12. Fajadet J, Morice MC, Bode C et al (2005) Maintenance of long-term clinical benefit with sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: three-year results of the RAVEL trial. Circulation 111:1040-1044 (Pubitemid 40354523)
13. Ehara M, Kawai M, Surmely JF et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography. JACC 49:951-959
14. Rist C, von Ziegler F, Nikolaou Ket al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography. Acad Radiol 13:1465-1473 (Pubitemid 44810002)
15. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 27:2567-2572 (Pubitemid 44627301)
16. Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2204-2210 (Pubitemid 46824113)
17. Oncel D, Oncel G, Karaca M (2007) Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography-initial experience. Radiology 242:403-408
18. Gaspar T, Halon D, Lewis B et al (2005) Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. JACC 46:1573-1579 (Pubitemid 41446198)
19. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al (2006) 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16:818-826 (Pubitemid 43380241)
20. Maintz D, Burg MC, Seifarth H et al (2009) Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT. Eur Radiol 19:42-49