The circumferential actomyosin belt in epithelial cells is regulated by the Lulu2-p114RhoGEF system

Small GTPases

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 91-96

  Nakajima, Hiroyuki ^a   Tanoue, Takuji ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARRIER PROTEINS AND BINDING PROTEINS; CINGULIN PROTEIN; LULU2 PROTEIN; MYOSIN ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; MYOSIN II; PATJ PROTEIN; PROTEIN P114RHOGEF; PROTEIN PKC; REGULATOR PROTEIN; RHO FACTOR; RNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL INTERACTION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME REGULATION; EPITHELIUM CELL; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RNA INTERFERENCE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84861473032     PISSN: 21541248     EISSN: 21541256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/sgtp.19112     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lecuit T, Lenne PF. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8:633-44; PMID:17643125; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2222
2. Nishimura T, Takeichi M. Remodeling of the adherens junctions during morphogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol 2009; 89:33-54; PMID:19737641; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0070-2153(09)89002-9
3. Kasza KE, Zallen JA. Dynamics and regulation of contractile actin-myosin networks in morphogenesis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2011; 23:30-8; PMID:21130639; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2010.10.014
4. Yonemura S, Wada Y, Watanabe T, Nagafuchi A, Shibata M. alpha-Catenin as a tension transducer that induces adherens junction development. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:533-42; PMID:20453849; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ncb2055
5. Yamazaki Y, Umeda K, Wada M, Nada S, Okada M, Tsukita S, et al. ZO-1-and ZO-2-dependent integration of myosin-2 to epithelial zonula adherens. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:3801-11; PMID:18596233; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-04-0352
6. Smutny M, Cox HL, Leerberg JM, Kovacs EM, Conti MA, Ferguson C, et al. Myosin II isoforms identify distinct functional modules that support integrity of the epithelial zonula adherens. Nat Cell Biol 2010; 12:696-702; PMID:20543839; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb2072
7. Sawyer JM, Harrell JR, Shemer G, Sullivan-Brown J, Roh-Johnson M, Goldstein B. Apical constriction: a cell shape change that can drive morphogenesis. Dev Biol 2010; 341:5-19; PMID:19751720; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.09.009
8. Lee JY, Harland RM. Actomyosin contractility and microtubules drive apical constriction in Xenopus bottle cells. Dev Biol 2007; 311:40-52; PMID:17868669; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.08.010
9. Martin AC, Kaschube M, Wieschaus EF. Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature 2009; 457:495-9; PMID:19029882; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07522
10. Hildebrand JD, Soriano P. Shroom, a PDZ domaincontaining actin-binding protein, is required for neural tube morphogenesis in mice. Cell 1999; 99:485-97; PMID:10589677; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81537-8
11. Haigo SL, Hildebrand JD, Harland RM, Wallingford JB. Shroom induces apical constriction and is required for hingepoint formation during neural tube closure. Curr Biol 2003; 13:2125-37; PMID:14680628; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2003.11.054
12. Hildebrand JD. Shroom regulates epithelial cell shape via the apical positioning of an actomyosin network. J Cell Sci 2005; 118:5191-203; PMID:16249236; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02626
13. Nishimura T, Takeichi M. Shroom3-mediated recruitment of Rho kinases to the apical cell junctions regulates epithelial and neuroepithelial planar remodeling. Development 2008; 135:1493-502; PMID:18339671; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.019646
14. Nakajima H, Tanoue T. Epithelial cell shape is regulated by Lulu proteins via myosin-II. J Cell Sci 2010; 123:555-66; PMID:20103536; http://dx.doi. org/10.1242/jcs.057752
15. García-García MJ, Eggenschwiler JT, Caspary T, Alcorn HL, Wyler MR, Huangfu D, et al. Analysis of mouse embryonic patterning and morphogenesis by forward genetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:5913-9; PMID:15755804; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.0501071102
16. Hirano M, Hashimoto S, Yonemura S, Sabe H, Aizawa S. EPB41L5 functions to post-transcriptionally regulate cadherin and integrin during epithelialmesenchymal transition. J Cell Biol 2008; 182:1217-30; PMID:18794329; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb. 200712086
17. Lee JD, Silva-Gagliardi NF, Tepass U, McGlade CJ, Anderson KV. The FERM protein Epb4.1l5 is required for organization of the neural plate and for the epithelial-mesenchymal transition at the primitive streak of the mouse embryo. Development 2007; 134:2007-16; PMID:17507402; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1242/dev.000885
18. Laprise P, Beronja S, Silva-Gagliardi NF, Pellikka M, Jensen AM, McGlade CJ, et al. The FERM protein Yurt is a negative regulatory component of the Crumbs complex that controls epithelial polarity and apical membrane size. Dev Cell 2006; 11:363-74; PMID: 16950127; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2006. 06.001
19. Laprise P, Lau KM, Harris KP, Silva-Gagliardi NF, Paul SM, Beronja S, et al. Yurt, Coracle, Neurexin IV and the Na(+), K(+)-ATPase form a novel group of epithelial polarity proteins. Nature 2009; 459: 1141-5; PMID:19553998; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nature08067
20. Nakajima H, Tanoue T. Lulu2 regulates the circumferential actomyosin tensile system in epithelial cells through p114RhoGEF. J Cell Biol 2011; 195: 245-61; PMID:22006950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/ jcb.201104118
21. Terry SJ, Zihni C, Elbediwy A, Vitiello E, Leefa Chong San IV, Balda MS, et al. Spatially restricted activation of RhoA signalling at epithelial junctions by p114RhoGEF drives junction formation and morphogenesis. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:159-66; PMID:21258369; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ncb2156
22. Tsuji T, Ohta Y, Kanno Y, Hirose K, Ohashi K, Mizuno K. Involvement of p114-RhoGEF and Lfc in Wnt-3aand dishevelled-induced RhoA activation and neurite retraction in N1E-115 mouse neuroblastoma cells. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21:3590-600; PMID:20810787; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0095
23. Niu J, Profirovic J, Pan H, Vaiskunaite R, Voyno-Yasenetskaya TG. G Protein betagamma subunits stimulate p114RhoGEF, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RhoA and Rac1: egulation of cell shape and reactive oxygen species production. Circ Res 2003; 93:848-56; PMID:14512443; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1161/01.RES.0000097607.14733.0C
24. Nagata K, Inagaki M. Cytoskeletal modification of Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity: identification of a Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor as a binding partner for Sept9b, a mammalian septin. Oncogene 2005; 24:65-76; PMID:15558029; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208101
25. Adachi M, Hamazaki Y, Kobayashi Y, Itoh M, Tsukita S, Furuse M, et al. Similar and distinct properties of MUPP1 and Patj, two homologous PDZ domaincontaining tight-junction proteins. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:2372-89; PMID:19255144; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1128/MCB.01505-08
26. Sugihara-Mizuno Y, Adachi M, Kobayashi Y, Hamazaki Y, Nishimura M, Imai T, et al. Molecular characterization of angiomotin/JEAP family proteins: interaction with MUPP1/Patj and their endogenous properties. Genes Cells 2007; 12:473-86; PMID:17397395; http:// dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01066.x
27. Paschoud S, Yu D, Pulimeno P, Jond L, Turner JR, Citi S. Cingulin and paracingulin show similar dynamic behaviour, but are recruited independently to junctions. Mol Membr Biol 2011; 28:123-35; PMID:21166484; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09687688.2010.538937
28. Ishiuchi T, Takeichi M. Willin and Par3 cooperatively regulate epithelial apical constriction through aPKCmediated ROCK phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol 2011; 13:860-6; PMID:21685893; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ ncb2274
29. Kishikawa M, Suzuki A, Ohno S. aPKC enables development of zonula adherens by antagonizing centripetal contraction of the circumferential actomyosin cables. J Cell Sci 2008; 121:2481-92; PMID:18628308; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.024109
30. Mashukova A, Wald FA, Salas PJ. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and inflammation disrupt the polarity complex in intestinal epithelial cells by a posttranslationalmechanism. Mol Cell Biol 2011; 31:756-65; PMID:21135124; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00811-10
31. Wald FA, Forteza R, Diwadkar-Watkins R, Mashukova A, Duncan R, AbreuMT, et al. Aberrant expression of the polarity complex atypical PKC and non-muscle myosin IIA in active and inactive inflammatory bowel disease. Virchows Arch 2011; 459:331-8; PMID:21667320; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-011-1102-1
32. Ivanov AI, Parkos CA, Nusrat A. Cytoskeletal regulation of epithelial barrier function during inflammation. Am J Pathol 2010; 177:512-24; PMID:20581053; http://dx. doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.100168
33. Turner JR. Intestinal mucosal barrier function in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2009; 9:799-809; PMID:19855405; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nri2653