Evaluation of sustainable development strategies and policies: The need for more timely indicators

Natural Resources Forum

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 101-108

  Lyytimäki, Jari ^a  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

European Union; Finland; Indicators; Sustainable development strategies; Timeliness

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN UNION; NATURAL RESOURCE; SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATOR; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

FINLAND;

EID: 84861466453     PISSN: 01650203     EISSN: 14778947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2012.01447.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Allum, P., Agça, M., 2001. Economic data dissemination: What influences country performance on frequency and timeliness? IMF working paper WP/01/173. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
2. Bauler, T., 2012. An analytical framework to discuss the usability of (environmental) indicators for policy. Ecological Indicators 17(1): 38-45.
3. Becker, J., 2001. Making sustainable development evaluations work. Sustainable Development 12(4): 200-211.
4. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2001. A sustainable Europe for a better world: A European Union strategy for sustainable development. COM(2001) 264 final. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
5. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2002. Towards a global partnership for sustainable development. COM/2002/82 final. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
6. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2007. Progress report on the sustainable development strategy 2007. COM (2007) 642 final. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
7. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2009. Mainstreaming sustainable development into EU policies: 2009 Review of the European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. COM (2009) 400 final. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
8. CEU (Council of the European Union), 2006. Review of the EU sustainable development strategy (EU SDS) - Renewed strategy. 10917/06. Council of the European Union, Brussels.
9. Conover, C.M., Miller, R.E., Szakmary, A., 2008. The timeliness of accounting disclosures in international security markets. International Review of Financial Analysis 17(5): 849-869.
10. Dailey, L., Watkins, R.E., Plant, A.J., 2007. Timeliness of data sources used for influenza surveillance. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(5): 626-631.
11. Dalal-Clayton, B., Bass, S., 2002. Sustainable development strategies. A resource book. Earthscan, London.
12. EEA (European Environment Agency), 2011. Eionet priority data flows. May 2010-April 2011. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
13. Eurostat, 2005. Measuring progress towards a more sustainable Europe. Sustainable development indicators for the European Union. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
14. Eurostat, 2007. Measuring progress towards a more sustainable Europe. 2007 monitoring report of the EU sustainable development strategy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
15. Eurostat, 2009. Sustainable development in the European Union. 2009 monitoring report of the EU sustainable development strategy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
16. Eurostat, 2011. Sustainable development in the European Union. 2011 monitoring report of the EU sustainable development strategy. Publications Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
17. Fixler, D., 2007. Timeliness and accuracy. In: Boumans M (ed.), Measurement in Economics: A Handbook. Elsevier, London, pp. 413-428.
18. Garcia, S.M., Staples, D.J., 2000. Sustainability reference systems and indicators for responsible marine capture fisheries: A review of concepts and elements for a set of guidelines. Marine and Freshwater Research 51(5): 385-426.
19. George, C., Kirkpatrick, C., 2006. Assessing national sustainable development strategies: Strengthening the links to operational policy. Natural Resources Forum 30(2): 146-156.
20. Hák, T., Moldan, B., Lyon Dahl, A. (eds.), 2007. Sustainability Indicators: A Scientific Assessment. SCOPE 67. Island Press, Washington, DC.
21. Hardi, P., Zdan, T. (eds), 1997. Assessing Sustainable Development: Principles in Practice. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg.
22. Hildén, M., 2009. Time horizons in evaluating environmental policies. New Directions for Evaluation 122(1): 9-18.
23. Kates, R.W., Parris, T.M., Leiserowitz, A.A., 2005. What is sustainable development? Goals indicators, values, and practice. Environment 47(3): 8-21.
24. KKTV (Kestävän kehityksen toimikunnan verkkosihteeristö), 2007. Kansallisen kestävän kehityksen strategian (Kohti kestäviä valintoja. Kansallisesti ja globaalisti kestävä Suomi. 2006) toimeenpanon edistymisen arviointi. 4.12.2007 REV. Kestävän kehityksen toimikunnan verkkosihteeristö, Helsinki.
25. Ledoux, L., Mertens, R., Wolff, P., 2005. EU sustainable development indicators: An overview. Natural Resources Forum 29(4): 392-403.
26. Lyytimäki, J., Gudmundsson, H., Sørensen, C.H., 2011. Russian dolls and Chinese whispers: Two perspectives on the unintended effects of sustainability indicator communication. Sustainable Development, doi: 10.1002/sd.530.
27. Lyytimäki, J., Hildén, M., 2011. Coping with ecological thresholds in coastal areas: Results from an international expert survey. Coastal Management 39(6): 598-602.
28. Lyytimäki, J., Rosenström, U., 2008. Skeletons out of the closet: Effectiveness of conceptual frameworks for communicating sustainable development indicators. Sustainable Development 16(5): 301-313.
29. McKenzie, R., 2006. Improving timeliness for short-term economic statistics. Proceedings of European Conference on Quality in Survey Statistics. 24-26 April 2006. Cardiff, UK.
30. MoE (Ministry of the Environment), 1998. Finnish government programme for sustainable development: Council of State decision-in-principle on the promotion of ecological sustainability. The Finnish Environment 266. Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki.
31. MoE (Ministry of the Environment), 2003. Evaluation of sustainable development in Finland - Summary. The Finnish Environment 645. Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki.
32. Moldan, B., Billharz, S., Matravers, R. (eds)., 1997. Sustainability Indicators: A Report on the Project on Indicators of Sustainable Development. SCOPE 58. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.
33. NCM (Nordic Council of Ministers), 2009. Sustainable development. New bearings for the Nordic Countries. Revised edition with goals and measures for 2009-2012. ANP 2009:727. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen.
34. Normander, B., Haigh, T., Cristiansen, J.S., Jensen, T.S., 2008. Development and implementation of a near-real-time web reporting system on ground-level ozone in Europe. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 4(4): 505-512.
35. PMO (Prime Minister's Office). 2006. Towards sustainable choices. A nationally and globally sustainable Finland. The national strategy for sustainable development. Prime Minister's Office Publications 7/2006. Prime Minister's Office, Helsinki.
36. Ramos, T.B., Caeiro, S., 2010. Meta-performance evaluation of sustainability indicators. Ecological Indicators 10(2): 157-166.
37. Ramboll, 2009. Kansallinen kestävän kehityksen arviointi 2009. Ramboll & Ympäristöministeriö, Helsinki.
38. Rosenström, U., 2009. Sustainable development indicators: Much wanted, less used? Monographs of the Boreal Environmental Research no. 33. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki.
39. Rosenström, U., Lyytimäki, J., 2006. The role of indicators in improving timeliness of international environmental reports. European Environment 16(1): 32-44.
40. Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C., Walker, B., 2001. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413(6856): 591-596.
41. Spangenberg, J.H., 2009. Sustainable development indicators: Towards integrated systems as a tool for managing and monitoring a complex transition. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 9(4), 318-337.
42. Steurer, R., Berger, G., Hametner, M., 2010. The vertical integration of Lisbon and sustainable development strategies across the EU: How different governance architectures shape the European coherence of policy documents. Natural Resources Forum 34(1) 71-84.
43. Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, A., 2007. Special issue: Sustainable development strategies in Europe: Taking stock 20 years after the Brundtland report. European Environment 17(3): 147-214.
44. Stevens, C., 2007. Workshop overview and recommendations. In Institutionalising sustainable development. OECD Sustainable Development Studies. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, pp. 9-12.
45. UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs), 2002. Guidance in preparing a national sustainable development strategy: Managing Sustainable Development in the New Millenium. Background Paper No. 13. Division for Sustainable Development, UNDESA. Available at: (accessed 5 February 2012).
46. UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs), 2010. National sustainable development strategies - The global picture 2010. Available at: (accessed 5 February 2012).
47. Vehmas, J., Luukkanen, J., Pihlajamäki, M., 2007. Report of decomposition analysis for indicators. Development and Comparison of Sustainability Indicators (DECOIN). Deliverable D3.1 of WP3. Available at: (accessed 5 February 2012).
48. YM (Ympäristöministeriö), 2003. Kestävän kehityksen kansallinen kokonaisarvio. Suomen ympäristö 623. Ympäristöministeriö, Helsinki.