Russian dolls and Chinese whispers: Two perspectives on the unintended effects of sustainability indicator communication

Sustainable Development

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 84-94

  Lyytimäki, Jari ^a   Gudmundsson, Henrik ^b   Sørensen, Claus Hedegaard ^b  

^a FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Communication; Impact assessment; Information utilization; Sustainable development; Use of indicators

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84898775629     PISSN: 09680802     EISSN: 10991719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sd.530     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alabaster T, Hawthorne M. 1999. Information for environmental citizenship. Sustainable Development 7: 25-34. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(199902)7:1<25::AID-SD98>3.0.CO;2-O
2. Assmuth T. 2011. Policy and science implications of the framing and qualities of uncertainty in risks: toxic and beneficial fish from the Baltic Sea. Ambio 40: 158-169. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-010-0127-z
3. Barker A, Peters BG (eds). 1993. The Politics of Expert Advice: Creating, Using and Manipulating Scientific Knowledge for Public Policy. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh.
4. Becker J. 2004. Making sustainable development evaluations work. Sustainable Development 12: 200-211. DOI: 10.1002/sd.236.
5. Bell S, Morse S. 2004. Experiences with sustainability indicators and stakeholder participation: a case study relating to a 'Blue Plan' project in Malta. Sustainable Development 12: 1-14. DOI: 10.1002/sd.225.
6. Bell S, Morse S. 2007. Story telling in sustainable development projects. Sustainable Development 15: 97-110. DOI: 10.1002/sd.305.
7. Bell S, Morse S. 2008. Sustainability Indicators: measuring the immeasurable. Earthscan: London.
8. van den Bergh JCJM. 2010. An assessment of Lomborg's The Skeptical Environmentalist and the ensuing debate. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences 7: 23-52. DOI: 10.1080/19438150903533730
9. Bevan G, Hood C. 2006. What's measured is what matters: targets and gaming in the English public healthcare system. Public Administration 84: 517-538. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x.
10. Boulanger P-M. 2007. Political uses of social indicators: overview and application to sustainable development indicators. International Journal of Sustainable Development 10: 14-32. DOI: 10.1504/IJSD.2007.014411.
11. Bovens M, T'Hart P, Peters BG (eds). 2001. Success and Failure in Public Governance: A Comparative Analysis. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
12. Briassoulis H. 2001. Sustainable development and its indicators: through a (planner's) glass darkly. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 44: 409-427. DOI: 10.1080/09640560120046142.
13. de Bruijn H. 2002. Performance measurement in the public sector: strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 15: 578-594. DOI: 10.1108/09513550210448607.
14. Caplan N. 1976. Social research and national policy: What gets used, by whom, for what purposes, and with what effects? International Social Science Journal 28: 187-194.
15. Carter N, Klein R, Day P. 1993. How organizations measure success. The Use of Performance Indicators in Government. Routledge: London.
16. Chess C, Johnson BB, Gibson G. 2005. Communicating about environmental indicators. Journal of Risk Research 8: 63-75. DOI: 10.1080/1366987042000275109.
17. Cho H, Salmon CT. 2007. Unintended effects of health communication campaigns. Journal of Communication 57: 293-317. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00344.x.
18. Cobb CW, Rixford C. 1998. Lessons Learned from the History of Social Indicators. Redefining Progress: San Francisco, CA.
19. Duchêne F, Journel CM, Coanus T. 2002. The forgotten construction process of indicator sets. The social dimension of air pollution measurement in the Greater Lyons area (France). Ecological Indicators 2: 187-196. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00038-9.
20. EEA. 1999. EnvironmentalIindicators: Typology and Overview. European Environment Agency: Copenhagen.
21. Emmerink RHM, Axhausen KW, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P. 1995. Effects of information in road transport networks with recurrent congestion. Transportation 22: 21-53. DOI: 10.1007/BF01151617.
22. Esty D, Levy M, Kim C, de Sherbinin A, Srebotnjak T, Mara V. 2008. 2008 Environmental Performance Index. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy: New Haven, CT.
23. Eyles J, Furgal C. 2002. Indicators in environmental health: identifying and selecting common sets. Canadian Journal of Public Health 93: S62-S67.
24. Festinger L. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
25. Franceschini F, Galetto M, Maisano D, Mastrogiacomo L. 2008. Properties of performance indicators in operations management. A reference framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 57: 137-155. DOI: 10.1108/17410400810847401.
26. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25: 735-755. DOI:10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L.
27. Gudmundsson H. 2003. The policy use of environmental indicators. Learning from evaluation research. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies 2: 1-12. http://www.journal-tes.dk/vol%202%20no%202/Henrik%20Gudmundsson.html [10 January 2010]
28. Gudmundsson H, Lehtonen M, Bauler T, Sébastien L, Morse S. 2009. Process and results of analytical framework and typology development for POINT. Policy use and influence of indicators POINT. Deliverable D5. http://www.point-eufp7.info/storage/POINT_WP2DeliverableD5-FINAL-REV.pdf [20 August 2011].
29. Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243-1248. DOI: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.
30. Henderson-Sellers A. 1998. Climate whispers: Media communication about climate change. Climatic Change 40: 421-456. DOI 10.1023/A:1005384523305.
31. Henry GT, Mark MM. 2003. Beyond use: understanding evaluation's influence on attitudes and actions. American Journal of Evaluation 24: 293-314. DOI: 10.1177/109821400302400302.
32. Herrick C, Sarewitz D. 2000. Ex post evaluation: a more effective role for scientific assessments in environmental policy. Science, Technology, & Human Values 25: 309-331. DOI: 10.1177/016224390002500303.
33. Hezri AA. 2004. Sustainability indicator system and policy processes in Malaysia: a framework for utilisation and learning. Journal of Environmental Management 73: 357-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.07.010.
34. Hildén M, Rosenström U. 2008. The use of indicators for sustainable development. Sustainable Development 16: 237-240. DOI: 10.1002/sd.375.
35. Hilgartner S. 1990. The dominant view of popularization: conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science 20: 519-539. DOI: 10.1177/030631290020003006.
36. Husain Z. 2009. Commons and commoners: re-examining community in common pool resources. Sustainable Development 17: 142-154. DOI: 10.1002/sd.371.
37. Ihlen Ø, Roper J. 2011. Corporate reports on sustainability and sustainable development: 'We have arrived'. Sustainable Development, forthcoming. DOI: 10.1002/sd.524
38. Innes JE. 1998. Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 64: 52-63. DOI: 10.1080/01944369808975956.
39. Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S. 1998. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Analysis 8: 177-187. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x.
40. Kates RW, Parris TM, Leiserowitz AA. 2005. What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment 47: 8-21.
41. Lehtonen M. 2008. Mainstreaming sustainable development in the OECD through indicators and peer reviews. Sustainable Development 16: 241-250. DOI: 10.1002/sd.378.
42. von der Lippe P. 1999. The political role of official statistics in the former GDR (East Germany). Historical Social Research 14: 3-28.
43. Lyytimäki J, Hildén M. 2007. Thresholds of sustainability: policy challenges of regime shifts in coastal areas. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy 3: 61-69. http://ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol3iss2/communityessay.lyytimaki.html [14 June 2011]
44. Lyytimäki J, Rosenström U. 2008. Skeletons out of the closet: effectiveness of conceptual frameworks for communicating sustainable development indicators. Sustainable Development 16: 301-313. DOI: 10.1002/sd.330.
45. Lyytimäki J, Assmuth T, Hildén M. 2011. Unrecognized, concealed or forgotten-the case of absent information in risk communication. Journal of Risk Research 14: 757-773. DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2011.571773.
46. Marsh GP. 1874. The Earth as Modified by Human Action. The Encyclopedia of Earth, Historical E-Book: http://www.eoearth.org/article/Earth_as_Modified_by_Human_Action%2C_The_(historical_e-book) [14 June 2011]
47. McManus P, Haughton G. 2006. Planning with ecological footprints: a sympathetic critique of theory and practice. Environment and Urbanization 18: 113-127. DOI: 10.1177/0956247806063963.
48. Mickwitz P. 2003. A Framework for evaluating environmental policy instruments: context and key concepts. Evaluation 9: 415-436. DOI: 10.1177/1356389003094004
49. Mickwitz P, Birnbaum M. 2009. Key insights for the design of environmental evaluations. New Directions for Evaluation 122: 105-112. DOI: 10.1002/ev.300.
50. Mickwitz P, Melanen M. 2009. The role of co-operation between academia and policymakers for the development and use of sustainability indicators-a case from the Finnish Kymenlaakso Region. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 1086-1100. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.003.
51. Mitchell G. 1996. Problems and fundamentals of sustainable development indicators. Sustainable Development 4: 1-11. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1719(199603)4:1<1::AID-SD24>3.0.CO;2-N.
52. Morse S. 2010. Out of sight, out of mind. Reporting of three indices in the UK national press between 1990 and 2009. Sustainable Development forthcoming. DOI: 10.1002/sd.505.
53. Morse S, McNamara N, Acholo M, Okwoli B. 2001. Sustainability indicators: the problem of integration. Sustainable Development 9: 1-15. DOI: 10.1002/sd.148.
54. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. 2007. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin 133: 673-693. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673
55. Norgaard KM. 2006. "We don't really want to know" environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organization & Environment 19: 347-370. DOI: 10.1177/1086026606292571.
56. OECD. 2003. Environmental Indicators-Development, Measurement and Use. OECD: Paris.
57. Pollitt C. 2006. Performance information for democracy. The missing link? Evaluation 12: 39-56. DOI: 10.1177/1356389006064191.
58. Rametsteiner E, Pülzl H, Alkan-Olsson J, Frederiksen P. 2011. Sustainability indicator development-science or political negotiation? Ecological Indicators 11: 61-70.
59. Randolph W, Viswanath K. 2004. Lessons learned from public health mass media campaigns: marketing health in a crowded media world. Annual Review of Public Health 25: 419-437. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.25.101802.123046.
60. Rich RF. 1997. Measuring knowledge utilization: process and outcomes. Knowledge Technology and Policy 10: 11-24. DOI: 10.1007/BF02912504.
61. Rosenström U. 2009. Sustainable Development Indicators: Much Wanted, Less Used? Monographs of the Boreal Environmental Research no. 33. Finnish Environment Institute: Helsinki.
62. Rosenström U, Lyytimäki J. 2006. The role of indicators in improving timeliness of international environmental reports. European Environment 16: 32-44. DOI: 10.1002/eet.403.
63. Rydin Y. 2002. Indicators into Action: Local Sustainability Indicator Sets in their Context. The Pastille Consortium, London School of Economics: London.
64. Sabatier PA (eds). 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Westview Press: Boulder, CO.
65. Sanderson I. 2004. Getting evidence into practice: perspectives on rationality. Evaluation 10: 366-379. DOI: 10.1177/1356389004048283.
66. Sørensen C, Gudmundsson H. 2010. Målstyret transportpolitik - Hvad kan Danmark lære af Sverige og Norge? Økonomi & Politik 83: 3-19.
67. Stiglitz J, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P. 2009. Report of the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. CMEPSP. http://www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/en/documents.htm [14 June 2011]
68. Trench B. 2008. Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In: Communicating Science in Social Contexts: New Models, New Practices, Cheng D, Claessens M, Gascoigne T, Metcalfe J, Schiele B, Shi S (eds). Springer: New York; 119-138.
69. Vahabi M. 2007. The impact of health communication on health-related decision making: a review of evidence. Health Education 107: 27-41. DOI: 10.1108/09654280710716860.
70. Weber EU. 2006. Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change 77: 103-120. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3.
71. Weiss CH. 1998. Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluations? American Journal of Evaluation 19: 21-33. DOI: 10.1177/109821409801900103.
72. WWF. 2008. Living Planet Report 2008. WWF, Zoological Museum of London, Global Footprint Network: Gland.
73. Wynne B. 1991. Knowledges in context. Science, Technology and Human Values 16: 111-121. DOI: 10.1177/016224399101600108.
74. Yli-Viikari A. 2009. Confusing messages of sustainability indicators. Local Environment 14: 891-903. DOI: 10.1080/13549830903255405.