How automated peritoneal dialysis is applied and maintained in Japan

Contributions to Nephrology

Volumn 177, Issue , 2012, Pages 13-23

  Nakamoto, Hidetomo ^a  

^a SAITAMA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; HUMAN; JAPAN; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; REVIEW;

AUTOMATION; HUMANS; JAPAN; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; RENAL DIALYSIS;

EID: 84861453178     PISSN: 03025144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1159/000336929     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Blake PG, Bloembergen WE, Fenton SA: Changes in demographics and prescription of PD during the last decade. Am J Kidney Dis 1998;32(suppl 4):S44-S51.
2. Coles GA, Williams JD: What is the place of peritoneal dialysis in the integrated treatment of renal failure? Kidney Int 1998;54: 2234-2240.
3. Wolcott DL, Nissensson AR: Quality of life in chronic dialysis patients: a critical comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1988;11:402-412.
4. Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy: An overview of regular dialysis treatment in Japan as of December 31, 2003 (in Japanese). Japan Society for Dialysis Therapy.
5. Young EW, Goodkin DA, Mapes DL, Port FK, Keen ML, Chen K, Maroni BL, Wolfe RA, Held PJ: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS): an international hemodialysis study. Kidney Int 2000; 57(suppl 74):S74-S81.
6. Goodkin DA, Bragg- Gresham JL, Koenig KG, Wolfe RA, Akiba T, Angreucci VE, Saito A, Rayner HC, Kurokawa K, Port FK, Held PJ, Young EW: Association of comorbid conditions and mortality in hemodialysis patients in Europe, Japan, and the United States: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). J Am Soc Nephrol 2003;14:3270-3277.
7. Aloatti S, Manes M, Paternoster G, Gaiter AM, Molino A, Rosati C: Peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis in the treatment of end- stage renal disease. J Nephrol 2000;13:331-342.
8. Davies SJ, Phillips L, Griffiths AM, Russell LH, Naish PF: What really happens to people on long- term peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 1998;54:2207-2217.
9. Blake PG: Trends in patient and technique survival in peritoneal dialysis and strategies: how are we doing and how we can do better? Adv Renal Replace Ther 2000;7:324-337.
10. Nakamoto H, Suzuki H, Kawaguchi Y: Why technique survival rate is so good in Japan? Perit Dial Int 2006;26:136-143.
11. European Renal Association (ERA) and European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EDTA) Registry: ERA- EDTA Registry Annual Reports 2006. Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center/Department of Medical Information, 2008. Available at www.era- edta- reg.org/files/annualreports/ pdf/AnnRep2006.pdf (accessed November 2008).
12. Mujais S, Nolph K, Gokal R, et al: Evaluation and management of ultrafiltration problems in peritoneal dialysis. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis Ad Hoc Committee on Ultrafiltration Management in Peritoneal Dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2000;20:S5-S21.
13. Rumpsfeld M, McDonald SP, Johnson DW: Higher peritoneal transport status is associated with higher mortality and technique failure in the Australian and New Zealand peritoneal dialysis patient populations. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:271-278.
14. Davies SJ: Mitigating peritoneal membrane characteristics in modern peritoneal dialysis therapy. Kidney Int Suppl 2006;103:S76-S83.
15. Li PK, Chow KM: Maximizing the success of peritoneal dialysis in high transporters. Perit Dial Int 2007;27:S148-S152.
16. Brimble KS, Walker M, Margetts PJ, et al: Meta- analysis: peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:2591-2598.
17. Churchill DN, Thorpe KN, Nolph KD, et al: Increased peritoneal membrane transport is associated with decreased patient and technique survival for continuous peritoneal dialysis patients. The Canada- USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;9:1285-1292.
18. Fried L: Higher membrane permeability predicts poorer patient survival. Perit Dial Int 1997;17:387-389.
19. Davies SJ, Phillips L, Russell GI: Peritoneal solute transport predicts survival on CAPD independently of residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:962-968.
20. Tzamaloukas AH, Saddler MC: Murata GH: Symptomatic fluid retention in patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995;6:198-206.
21. Bro S, Bjorner JB, Tofte Jensen P, et al: A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment. Perit Dial Int 1999;19:526-533.
22. Rabindranath KS, Amato D, Vonesh E, et al: Automated vs. continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007;22:2991-2998.
23. Johnson DW, Hawley CM, McDonald SP, Brown FG, Rosman JB, Bannister KM, Badve SV: Superior survival of high transporters treated with automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010;25:1973-1979.
24. Cnossen TT, Usvyat L, Kotanko P, van der Sande FM, Carter M, Leunissen KM, Levin NW: Comparison of outcomes on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis: results from a USA database. Perit Dial Int 2011;31: 679-684.
25. Sun CY, Lee CC, Lin YY, Wu MS: In younger dialysis patients, automated peritoneal dialysis is associated with better long- term patient and technique survival than is continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2011;31:301-307.
26. Oreopoulos D, Thodis E, Paraskevas KT: The promising future of long- term peritoneal dialysis. Int Urol Nephrol 2008;40:405-410.
27. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Division of Kidney, Urologic, and Hematologic Diseases: USRDS 2007 annual data report. Atlas of end- stage renal disease in the United States. Bethesda, Unite States Renal Data System, 2007.
28. Fine RN, Ho M: The role of APD in the management of pediatric patients. A report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Semin Dial 2002;15: 427-429.